-
1
-
-
0017556716
-
-
B. Barbara, J. X. Boucherle, J. L. Buevoz, M. F. Rossignol, and J. Schweizer, Solid State Commun. 24, 481 (1977).
-
(1977)
Solid State Commun.
, vol.24
, pp. 481
-
-
Barbara, B.1
Boucherle, J.X.2
Buevoz, J.L.3
Rossignol, M.F.4
Schweizer, J.5
-
2
-
-
0018445288
-
-
B. Barbara, M. F. Rossignol, J. X. Boucherle, J. Schweizer, and J. L. Buevoz, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 2300 (1979).
-
(1979)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.50
, pp. 2300
-
-
Barbara, B.1
Rossignol, M.F.2
Boucherle, J.X.3
Schweizer, J.4
Buevoz, J.L.5
-
3
-
-
4244136770
-
-
S. M. Shapiro, E. Gurewitz, R. D. Parks, and L. C. Kupferberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1748 (1979).
-
(1979)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.34
, pp. 1748
-
-
Shapiro, S.M.1
Gurewitz, E.2
Parks, R.D.3
Kupferberg, L.C.4
-
4
-
-
4243557943
-
-
B. Barbara, M. F. Rossignol, J. X. Boucherle, and C. Vettier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 938 (1980).
-
(1980)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.45
, pp. 938
-
-
Barbara, B.1
Rossignol, M.F.2
Boucherle, J.X.3
Vettier, C.4
-
5
-
-
0000835866
-
-
E. M. Forgan, B. D. Rainford, S. L. Lee, J. S. Abell, and Y. Bi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 10 211 (1990).
-
(1990)
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
, vol.2
, pp. 10211
-
-
Forgan, E.M.1
Rainford, B.D.2
Lee, S.L.3
Abell, J.S.4
Bi, Y.5
-
7
-
-
0002811168
-
-
edited by S. L. Lee, S. H. Kilcoyne, and R. Cywinski (SUSSP Publications and IOP Publishing, Bristol
-
A. Schenck, in Muon Science, edited by S. L. Lee, S. H. Kilcoyne, and R. Cywinski (SUSSP Publications and IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1999), p. 39.
-
(1999)
Muon Science
, pp. 39
-
-
Schenck, A.1
-
9
-
-
4244149232
-
-
F. N. Gygax, G. Solt, A. Amato, I. S. Anderson, M. Pinkpank, A. Schenck, and T. J. Udovic, Phys. Rev. B 61, 168 (2000).
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.61
, pp. 168
-
-
Gygax, F.N.1
Solt, G.2
Amato, A.3
Anderson, I.S.4
Pinkpank, M.5
Schenck, A.6
Udovic, T.J.7
-
10
-
-
0001120658
-
-
A. Schenck, N. K. Sato, G. Solt, D. Andreica, F. N. Gygax, M. Pinkpank, and A. Amato, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 245 (2000).
-
(2000)
Eur. Phys. J. B
, vol.13
, pp. 245
-
-
Schenck, A.1
Sato, N.K.2
Solt, G.3
Andreica, D.4
Gygax, F.N.5
Pinkpank, M.6
Amato, A.7
-
11
-
-
0033719886
-
-
A. M. Mulders, C. T. Kaiser, P. C. M. Gubbens, A. Amato, F. N. Gygax, M. Pinkpank, A. Schenck, P. Dalmas de Réotier, A. Yaouanc, K. H. J. Bushow, F. Kayzel, and A. Menovsky, Physica B 289-290, 451 (2000).
-
(2000)
Physica B
, vol.289-290
, pp. 451
-
-
Mulders, A.M.1
Kaiser, C.T.2
Gubbens, P.C.M.3
Amato, A.4
Gygax, F.N.5
Pinkpank, M.6
Schenck, A.7
Dalmas de Réotier, P.8
Yaouanc, A.9
Bushow, K.H.J.10
Kayzel, F.11
Menovsky, A.12
-
12
-
-
0007777931
-
-
O. Hartmann, R. Wäppling, A. Yaouanc, P. Dalams de Réotier, B. Barbara, K. Aggarwal, L. Asch, A. Kratzer, G. M. Kalvius, F. J. Litterst, F. N. Gygax, B. Hitti, E. Lippelt, and A. Schenck, Hyperfine Interact. 51, 955 (1989).
-
(1989)
Hyperfine Interact.
, vol.51
, pp. 955
-
-
Hartmann, O.1
Wäppling, R.2
Yaouanc, A.3
Dalams de Réotier, P.4
Barbara, B.5
Aggarwal, K.6
Asch, L.7
Kratzer, A.8
Kalvius, G.M.9
Litterst, F.J.10
Gygax, F.N.11
Hitti, B.12
Lippelt, E.13
Schenck, A.14
-
14
-
-
4244173036
-
-
A. Schenck, D. Andreica, M. Pinkpank, F. N. Gygax, H. R. Ott, A. Amato, R. H. Heffner, D. E. MacLaughlin, and G. J. Nieuwenhuys, Physica B 259-261, 14 (1999).
-
(1999)
Physica B
, vol.259-261
, pp. 14
-
-
Schenck, A.1
Andreica, D.2
Pinkpank, M.3
Gygax, F.N.4
Ott, H.R.5
Amato, A.6
Heffner, R.H.7
MacLaughlin, D.E.8
Nieuwenhuys, G.J.9
-
15
-
-
85038276986
-
-
the experiment (formula presented) was oriented nearly parallel to one of the principal axes, e.g., parallel to [0, 0, 1]. Rotating the sample by 90° around an axis perpendicular to (formula presented) did not change the signal (this was done at 1.85 K). This observation could imply that the crystal possessed only a single domain such that the internal field was oriented parallel to the axis of rotation, which is extremely unlikely. We also checked whether the domain structure could be influenced by an external field (applied parallel to (formula presented) and a [1, 0, 0] axis) by comparing ZF measurements after ZF cooling and after field cooling in 0.6 T. No difference in the signal composition and fit parameters was observed.
-
In the experiment (formula presented) was oriented nearly parallel to one of the principal axes, e.g., parallel to [0, 0, 1]. Rotating the sample by 90° around an axis perpendicular to (formula presented) did not change the signal (this was done at 1.85 K). This observation could imply that the crystal possessed only a single domain such that the internal field was oriented parallel to the axis of rotation, which is extremely unlikely. We also checked whether the domain structure could be influenced by an external field (applied parallel to (formula presented) and a [1, 0, 0] axis) by comparing ZF measurements after ZF cooling and after field cooling in 0.6 T. No difference in the signal composition and fit parameters was observed.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
0000989218
-
-
See, e.g
-
See, e.g., A. V. Skripov, J. C. Cook, D. S. Sibirtsev, C. Karmonik, and R. Hempelmann, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 1787 (1998);
-
(1998)
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
, vol.10
, pp. 1787
-
-
Skripov, A.V.1
Cook, J.C.2
Sibirtsev, D.S.3
Karmonik, C.4
Hempelmann, R.5
-
19
-
-
0000479823
-
-
A. V. Skripov, M. Pionke, O. Randl, and R. Hempelmann, 11, 1489 (1999).
-
(1999)
, vol.11
, pp. 1489
-
-
Skripov, A.V.1
Pionke, M.2
Randl, O.3
Hempelmann, R.4
|