Universal Intermediate Phases of Dilute Electronic and Molecular Glasses

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 88, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 4-

  Phillips, J C ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85038268823     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.216401     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J. C. Phillips, Philos. Mag. B 79, 527 (1999).
2. J. H. Schon, Ch. Kloc, and B. Batlogg, Nature (London) 408, 549 (2001)
3. J. H. SchonCh. KlocB. Batlogg Science 293, 2432 (2001).
4. M. S. Osofsky, R. J. Soulen, J. H. Claasen, G. Trotter, H. Kim, and J. S. Horwitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 197004 (2001).
5. These ideas are not new, but in most theories the failure of the EMA has been ignored because it appears to be impossible to analyze the nature of the fluctuations using brute-force methods. See R. Landauer, in Electrical Transport and Optical Properties of Inhomogeneous Media, J. C. Garland and D. B. Tanner, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 40 (AIP, New York, 1978), pp. 2–43.
6. J. C. Phillips, Physica (Amsterdam) 252C, 188 (1995).
7. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 943 (1993).
8. Even the classical network case is insoluble for many particles, as it is also related to the traveling salesman problem: R. Monasson, R. Zecchina, S. Kirkpatrick, B. Selman, and L. Troyansky, Nature (London) 400, 133 (1999).
9. P. W. Anderson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6653 (1995).
10. K. M. Itoh, M. Watanabe, Y. Ootuka, and E. E. Haller, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 1, 1 (1999).
11. The difference between this (Formula presented) case and the “ (Formula presented)” MOSFET case is that there the dopants are separated from the carriers, which results in loss of coherence in puddles between saddle points: Y. Meir, Phys. Rev. B 63, 073108 (2001).
12. I. A. Campbell and L. Bernardi, Phys. Rev. B 50, 12 643 (1994).
13. J. C. Phillips, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1133 (1996).
14. D. Levesque and J. J. Weis, Phys. Rev. E 49, 5131 (1994)
15. T. Tlusty and S. A. Safran, Science 290, 1328 (2000).
16. P. A. Bopp, A. A. Kornyshev, and G. Sutmann, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1939 (1998).
17. J. C. Phillips, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 34, 153 (1979)
18. H. He and M. F. Thorpe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2107 (1985).
19. M. F. Thorpe, M. V. Chubinsky, D. J. Jacobs, and J. C. Phillips, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 266–269, 859 (2000).
20. D. Selvanathan, W. J. Bresser, P. Boolchand, and B. Goodman, Solid State Commun. 111, 619 (1999)
21. Y. Wang, J. Wells, D. G. Georgiev, P. Boolchand, K. Jackson, and M. Micoulaut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 185503 (2001)
22. P. Boolchand, D. G. Georgiev, and B. Goodman, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 13, 703 (2001).
23. J. C. Phillips, Solid State Commun. 109, 301 (1999).
24. J. C. Phillips and J. Jung, Philos. Mag. B 81, 745 (2001).
25. H. L. Stormer, A. F. J. Levi, K. W. Baldwin, M. Anzlowar, and G. S. Boebinger, Phys. Rev. B 38, 2472 (1988).
26. J. C. Phillips, Philos. Mag. B 82, 783 (2002).
27. T. Schneider and H. Keller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4899 (2001).
28. J. H. Schon, M. Dorget, F. C. Beuran, X. Z. Zu, E. Arushanov, C. Deville Cavellin, and M. Lugues, Nature (London) 414, 434 (2001)
29. K. A. Mueller and C. W. Chu, cond-mat/0203457.
30. J. C. Phillips, Philos. Mag. B 82, 771 (2002).
31. J. C. Phillips, “Rutgers Lectures on Nanoscale Networks” (unpublished) (available on request).