Radiometric correction of simultaneously acquired Landsat-7/Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A imagery using Pseudoinvariant Areas (PIA): Contributing to the Landsat time series legacy

Remote Sensing

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2017, Pages

  Padró, Joan Cristian ^a   Pons, Xavier ^a   Aragonés, David ^b   Díaz Delgado, Ricardo ^b   García, Diego ^b   Bustamante, Javier ^b   Pesquer, Lluís ^a   Domingo Marimon, Cristina ^a   González Guerrero, Òscar ^a   Cristóbal, Jordi ^c,d   Doktor, Daniel ^e   Lange, Maximilian ^e  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^c ASIAQ Greenland Survey   (Denmark)

^d University of Alaska Fairbanks   (United States)

^e HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Field spectroradiometry; Landsat Legacy; Landsat 7; Landsat 8; Pseudoinvariant areas (PIA); Radiometric correction; Sentinel 2A

Indexed keywords

RADIOMETERS; RADIOMETRY; TIME SERIES;

FIELD SPECTRORADIOMETRY; LANDSAT; LANDSAT 7; PSEUDOINVARIANT AREAS (PIA); RADIOMETRIC CORRECTIONS; SENTINEL-2A;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 85038212661     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs9121319     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LCDM). Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/landsat/main/index.html (accessed on 28 October 2017)
2. GEOSS. GEOSS Evolution. Available online: http://www.earthobservations.org/geoss.php (accessed on 28 October 2017)
3. European Space Agency (ESA). ESA Sentinel Online. Sentinel-2 Mission. Available online: http://www.esa. int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-2 (accessed on 28 October 2017)
4. European Space Agency (ESA). ESA Sentinel Online. Sentinel-2 Mission Objectives. Available online: https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/missions/sentinel-2/mission-objectives (accessed on 28 October 2017)
5. Drusch, M.; Del Bello, U.; Carlier, S.; Colin, O.; Fernandez, V.; Gascon, F.; Hoersch, B.; Isola, C.; Laberinti, P.; Martimort, P.; et al. Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 120, 25-36
6. Chander, G.; Markham, B.L.; Helder, D.L. Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, 893-903
7. Barsi, J.A.; Kenton, L.; Kvaran, G.; Markham, B.L.; Pedelty, J.A. The Spectral Response of the Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI). Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 10232-10251
8. Mishra, N.; Helder, D.; Barsi, J.; Markham, B. Continuous calibration improvement in solar reflective bands: Landsat 5 through Landsat 8. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 1185, 7-15
9. Czapla-Myers, J.; McCorkel, J.; Anderson, N.; Thome, K.; Bigar, S.; Helder, D.; Aaron, D.; Leigh, L.; Mishra, N. The Ground-Based Absolute Radiometric Calibration of Landsat 8 OLI. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 600-626
10. Saunier, S.; Northrop, A.; Lavender, S.; Galli, L.; Ferrara, R.; Mica, S.; Biasutti, R.; Gory, P.; Gascon, F.; Meloni, M.; et al. European Space Agency (ESA) Landsat MSS/TM/ETM+/OLI Archive: 42 Years of our history. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th InternationalWorkshop on the Analysis of Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images (MultiTemp), Brugge, Belgium, 27-29 June 2017
11. Gascon, F.; Bouzinac, C.; Thépaut, O.; Jung, M.; Francesconi, B.; Louis, J.; Lonjou, V.; Lafrance, B.; Massera, S.; Gaudel-Vacaresse, A.; Languille, F.; et al. Copernicus Sentinel-2A Calibration and Products Validation Status. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 584
12. CEOS-WGCV. CEOSS Cal/Val Portal. Available online: http://calvalportal.ceos.org/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
13. Zhang, Z.; He, G.; Wang, X. A practical DOS model-based atmospheric correction algorithm. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 2837-2852
14. Markham, B.; Barsi, J.; Kvaran, G.; Ong, L.; Kaita, E.; Biggar, S.; Czapla-Myers, J.; Mishra, N.; Helder, D. Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager Radiometric Calibration and Stability. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 12275-12308
15. Claverie, M.; Masek, J. Harmonized Landsat-8 Sentinel-2 (HLS) Product's Guide. v.1.3. 2017. Available online: https://hls.gsfc.nasa.gov/documents/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
16. Atmospheric Correction Inter-Comparison Exercise (ACIX). Available online: https://earth.esa.int/web/ sppa/meetings-workshops/acix (accessed on 28 October 2017)
17. Holben, B.N.; Eck, T.F.; Slutsker, I.; Tanré, D.; Buis, J.P.; Setzer, A.; Vermote, E.; Reagan, J.A.; Kaufman, Y.J.; Nakajima, T.; et al. AERONET-A Federated Instrument Network and Data Archive for Aerosol Characterization. Remote Sens. Environ. 1998, 66, 1-16
18. Pons, X.; Solé-Sugrañes, L. A simple radiometric correction model to improve automatic mapping of vegetation from multispectral satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1994, 45, 317-332
19. Kokhanovsky, A.A.; de Leeuw, G. Satellite Aerosol Remote Sensing over Land, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; p. 388
20. Liou, K.N. An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2002; p. 583
21. Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Clayton, C.R.I.; Retalis, A. The use of selected Pseudoinvariant targets for the application of atmospheric correction in multi-temporal studies using satellite remotely sensed imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2009, 11, 192-200
22. Kaufman, Y.J.; Sendra, C. Algorithm for automatic atmospheric corrections to visible and near-IR satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1988, 9, 1357-1381
23. Chavez, P.S., Jr. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1988, 24, 459-479
24. Vermote, E.; Justice, C.; Claverie, M.; Franch, B. Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product. Remote Sens. Environ. 2016, 185, 46-56
25. Turner, R.E.; Malila, W.A.; Nalepha, R.F. Importance of atmospheric scattering in remote sensing. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 17-21 May 1971; Volume 3, pp. 1651-1697
26. Rozanov, V.V.; Rozanov, A.V. User's Guide for the Software Package SCIATRAN (Radiative Transfer Model and Retrieval Algorithm V.3.5); Institute of Remote Sensing, University of Bremen: Bremen, Germany, 2016; pp. 1-166. Available online: http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/sciatran/free_downloads/users_guide_ sciatran.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2017)
27. Rozanov, A.; Rozanov, V.; Buchwitz, M.; Kokhanovsky, A.A.; Burrows, J.P. SCIATRAN 2.0-A new radiative transfer model for geophysical applications in the 175-2400 nm spectral region. Adv. Space Res. 2005, 36, 1015-1019
28. Kotchenova, S.Y.; Vermote, E.F.; Matarrese, R.; Klemm, F.J., Jr. Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part I: Path radiance. Appl. Opt. 2006, 26, 6762-6774
29. Kotchenova, S.Y.; Vermote, E.F. Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part II: Homogeneous Lambertian and anisotropic surfaces. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 4455-4464
30. Stamnes, K.; Tsay, S.-C.; Wiscombe, W.; Jayaweera, K. Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl. Opt. 1988, 27, 2502-2509
31. Stamnes, K.; Tsay, S.-C.; Wiscombe, W.; Laszlo, I. DISORT, a General-Purpose Fortran Program for Discrete-Ordinate-Method Radiative Transfer in Scattering and Emitting Layered Media: Documentation of Methodology (Version 1.1); Tech. Rep.; Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Stevens Institute of Technology: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000; p. 112
32. Eriksson, P.; Buehler, S.A.; Davis, C.P.; Emde, C.; Lemke, O. ARTS, the atmospheric radiative transfer Simulator, version 2. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2011, 112, 1551-1558
33. Scott, N.A.; Chedin, A. A fast line-by-line method for Atmospheric Absorption Computations: The Automatized Atmospheric Absorption Atlas. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1981, 20, 802-812
34. Berk, A.; Conforti, P.; Kennett, R.; Perkins, T.; Hawes, F.; van den Bosch, J. MODTRAN6: A major upgrade of the MODTRAN radiative transfer code. In Proceedings of the SPIE 9088, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XX, Baltimore, MD, USA, 13 June 2014
35. Mayer, B.; Kylling, A. Technical note: The libRadtran software Package for radiative transfer calculations-Description and examples of use. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2005, 5, 1855-1877
36. Kokhanovsky, A.A.; Breon, F.-M.; Cacciari, A.; Carboni, E.; Diner, D.; Di Nicolantonio, W.; Grainger, R.G.; Grey, W.M.F.; Höller, R.; Lee, K.H.; et al. Aerosol remote sensing over land: A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments. Atmos. Res. 2007, 85, 372-394
37. Kokhanovsky, A.A. Light Scattering Media Optics. Problems and Solutions, 3rd ed.;Willey-Praxis: Chichester, UK, 2004; p. 320, ISBN 978-3-540-21184-6
38. Kokhanovsky, A.A. Polarization Optics of Random Media, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; p. 224, ISBN 978-3-540-42635-6
39. European Space Agency (ESA). ESA Missions. ENVISAT Instruments. SCIAMACHY. Available online: https://earth.esa.int/web/guest/missions/esa-operational-eo-missions/envisat/instruments/ sciamachy (accessed on 28 October 2017)
40. Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). Aeronet Data Download Tool. Version 3 Direct Sun Algorithm. Available online: https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
41. Chavez, P.S., Jr. Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections-Revisited and Improved. PE&RS 1996, 62, 1025-1036. Available online: https://www.unc.edu/courses/2008spring/geog/577/001/www/Chavez96- PERS.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
42. Hall, F.G.; Strebel, D.E.; Nickeson, J.E.; Goetz, S.J. Radiometric rectification: Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 35, 11-27
43. Pons, X.; Pesquer, L.; Cristóbal, J.; González-Guerrero, O. Automatic and improved radiometric correction of Landsat imagery using reference values from MODIS surface reflectance images. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2014, 33, 243-254
44. Vidal-Macua, J.J.; Zabala, A.; Ninyerola, M.; Pons, X. Developing spatially and thematically detailed backdated maps for land cover studies. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2016, 10, 175-206
45. Smith, G.M.; Milton, E.J. The use of the empirical line method to calibrate remotely sensed data to reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1999, 20, 2653-2662
46. Xu, J.-F.; Huang, J.-F. Empirical Line Method Using Spectrally Stable Targets to Calibrate IKONOS Imagery. Pedosphere 2007, 18, 124-130
47. Song, C.; Woodcock, C.E.; Seto, K.C.; Lenney, M.P.; Macomber, S.C. Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? Remote Sens. Environ. 2001, 75, 230-244
48. Richter, R.; Schläpfer, D. Atmospheric/Topographic Correction for Satellite Imagery (ATCOR-2/3 User Guide, Version 9.0.2, March 2016). 2016. Available online: http://www.rese.ch/pdf/atcor3_manual.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
49. Congedo, L. Semi-Automatic Classification Plugin Documentation. Release 5.3.2.1. 2016, pp. 161-164. Available online: https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/semiautomaticclassificationmanual-v4/latest/ semiautomaticclassificationmanual-v4.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2017)
50. Masek, J.; Vermote, E.F.; Saleous, N.E.;Wolfe, R.; Hall, F.G.; Huemmrich, K.F.; Gao, F.; Kutler, J.; Lim, T.-K. LEDAPS Calibration, Reflectance, Atmospheric Correction Preprocessing Code, Version 2. Model Product. Available online: https://daac.ornl.gov/MODELS/guides/LEDAPS_V2.html (accessed on 28 October 2017)
51. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Product Guide. Provisional Landsat 8 Surface Reflectance Code (LaSRC) Product. Version 4.0; Department of the Interior: Reston, VA, USA, 2016; p. 36. Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/lasrc_product_guide.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
52. Richter, R.; Louis, J.; Müller-Wilm, U. [L2A-ATBD] Sentinel-2 Level-2A Products Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. Version 2.0. 2012, pp. 1-72. Available online: https://earth.esa.int/c/document_library/get_ file?folderId=349490&name=DLFE-4518.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
53. United States Geological Survey (USGS). WRS-2 Scene Boundaries (Worldwide). Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/WRS-2_bound_world.kml (accessed on 28 October 2017)
54. European Space Agency (ESA). SENTINEL-2 Relative Orbits. Available online: https://sentinel.esa.int/ documents/247904/685211/S2A_rel_orbit_groundtrack_10Sec/57bcb79f-2696-4859-8292-07ac7166e884 (accessed on 28 October 2017)
55. United States Geological Survey (USGS). EarthExplorer Download Tool. Available online: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
56. European Space Agency (ESA). Copernicus Open Access Hub. Available online: https://scihub.copernicus. eu/dhus/#/home (accessed on 28 October 2017)
57. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Using the USGS Spectral Viewer. Landsat 7 ETM+. Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/L7_RSR.xlsx (accessed on 28 October 2017)
58. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Landsat Science, Spectral Response of the Operational Land Imager In-Band. Available online: http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/preliminary-spectralresponse- of-the-operational-land-imager-in-band-band-average-relative-spectral-response/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
59. European Space Agency (ESA). Sentinel Online, Sentinel-2A Document Library, Sentinel-2AA (S2A-SRF). Available online: https://earth.esa.int/documents/247904/685211/Sentinel-2+MSI+Spectral+Responses/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
60. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Landsat-8 Data User Handbook. Version 2.0. Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-8-l8-data-users-handbook (accessed on 28 October 2017)
61. European Space Agency (ESA). Sentinel-2A User Handbook. Released 24/07/2015. Rev. 2. Available online: https://sentinels.copernicus.eu/web/sentinel/user-guides/document-library/-/asset_publisher/ xlslt4309D5h/content/sentinel-2-user-handbook (accessed on 28 October 2017)
62. National Aeronautics and Space (NASA). Landsat Science, Spectral Response of the Multispectral Scanner System In-Band. Available online: http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/spectral-response-of-the-multispectralscanner- system-in-band-band-average-relative-spectral-response/ (accessed on 28 October 2017)
63. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Using the USGS Spectral Viewer. Landsat 5 TM. Available online: https://landsat.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/L5_TM_RSR.xlsx (accessed on 28 October 2017)
64. Jiménez, M.; Díaz-Delgado, R. Towards a Standard Plant Species Spectral Library Protocol for Vegetation Mapping: A Case Study in the Shrubland of Doñana National Park. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 2472-2495
65. De Miguel, E.; Fernández-Renau, A.; Prado, E.; Jiménez, M.; Gutiérrez de la Cámara, O.; Linés, C.; Gómez, J.A.; Martín, A.I.; Muñoz, F. A review of INTA AHS PAF. EARSeL eProc. 2014, 13, 20-29
66. Jiménez, M.; Díaz-Delgado, R.; Vaughan, P.; De Santis, A.; Fernández-Renau, A.; Prado, E.; Gutiérrez de la Cámara, O. Airborne hyperspectral scanner (AHS) mapping capacity simulation for the Doñana biological reserve scrublands. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, Davos, Switzerland, 12-14 March 2007; Schaepman, M., Liang, S., Groot, N., Kneubühler, M., Eds.; Available online: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVI/7-C50/papers/P81.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
67. Hatchell, D.C. (Ed.) Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc. (ASD) Technical Guide, 3rd ed.; Analytical Spectral Devices, Inc.: Boulder, CO, USA, 1999
68. Peña-Martinez, R.; Domínguez Gómez, J.A.; Ruiz-Verdú, A. Mapping of Photosynthetic Pigments in Spanish Reservoirs. In Proceedings of the MERIS User Workshop (ESA SP-549), ESA-ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, 10-13 November 2003
69. Mueller, J.L.; Brown, S.W.; Clark, D.K.; Johnson, B.C.; Yoon, H.; Lykke, K.R.; Flora, S.J.; Feinholz, M.E.; Souaidia, N.; Pietras, C.; et al. Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation. In Revision 2 NASA; Fargion, G.S., Mueller, J.L., Eds.; Goddard Space Flight Center: Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2000
70. Milton, E.J.; Schaepmann, M.E.; Anderson, K.; Kneubühler, M.; Fox, N. Progress in field spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, S92-S109
71. Meroni, M.; Colombo, R. 3S: A novel program for field spectroscopy. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 1491-1496
72. Mira, M.; Niclòs, R.; Valor, E.; Pons, X.; Cea, C.; García-Santos, V.; Caselles, D.; Caselles, V. Espectroradiometría de Campo del Visible al Infrarrojo Térmico de Muestras con Características Espectrales Singulares. In Proceedings of the XVI Congreso de la Asociación Española de Teledetección, Sevilla, Spain, 21-22 October 2015; pp. 213-219. Available online: http://www.aet.org.es/congresos/xvi/XVI_Congreso_ AET_actas.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
73. Zhu, X.; Liu, D.; Chen, J. A new geostatistical approach for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124, 49-60
74. Chen, J.; Zhu, X.; Vogelmann, J.E.; Gao, F.; Jin, S. A simple and effective method for filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC-off images. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1053-1064
75. Mueller-Wilm, U. Sen2Cor Configuration and User Manual V2.4; European Space Agency: Paris, Frence, 2017; pp. 1-53. Available online: http://step.esa.int/thirdparties/sen2cor/2.4.0/Sen2Cor_240_Documenation_ PDF/S2-PDGS-MPC-L2A-SUM-V2.4.0.pdf (accessed on 28 October 2017)
76. Pflug, B. Sentinel-2 L2A Processor Sen2Cor. In Proceedings of the EUFAR/ESA Expert Workshop on Atmospheric Correction of Remote Sensing Data, Berlin, Germany, 26-28 October 2016
77. Instituto Geográfico Nacional. Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía aérea. Modelos Digitales del Terreno Obtenidos a Partir de Nubes de Puntos LIDAR. Available online: http://centrodedescargas.cnig.es/ CentroDescargas/index.jsp (accessed on 28 October 2017)
78. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission United States 1 Arc Second; Version 3; NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center: Sioux Falls, SD, USA, 2013. Available online: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov (accessed on 28 October 2017)
79. Moran, M.; Jackson, R.; Slater, P.; Teillet, P. Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output. Remote Sens. Environ. 1992, 41, 169-184
80. Hale, S.R.; Rock, B.N. Impact of topographic normalization on land-cover classification accuracy. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 2003, 69, 785-791
81. Chance, C.M.; Hermosilla, T.; Coops, N.C.; Wulder, M.A.; White, J.C. Effect of topographic correction on forest change detection using spectral trend analysis of Landsat pixel-based composites. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2016, 44, 186-194
82. Vermote, E.F.; Tanre, D.; Deuzé, J.L.; Herman, M.; Morcrette, J.-J. Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: An Overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1997, 35, 675-686
83. Feng, M.; Huang, C.; Channan, S.; Vermote, E.F.; Masek, J.G.; Townshend, J.R. Quality assessment of Landsat surface reflectance products using MODIS data. Comp. Geosci. 2012, 38, 9-22
84. Feng, M.; Sexton, J.; Huang, C.; Masek, J.; Vermote, E.F.; Gao, F.; Narasimhan, R.; Channan, S.;Wolfe, R.E.; Townshend, J.R. Global surface reflectance products from Landsat: Assessment using coincident MODIS observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 134, 276-293
85. Vermote, E.F.; Kotchenova, S. Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, 2156-2202
86. Pons, X. MiraMon. Geographical Information System and Remote Sensing Software, Version 8.01b; Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF). Bellaterra. 2004. Available online: http://www.creaf.uab.cat/miramon/Index_usa.htm (accessed on 28 October 2017)
87. Pesquer, L.; Domingo, C.; Pons, X. A Geostatistical Approach for Selecting the Highest Quality MODIS Daily Images. In Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis: 6th Iberian Conference, IbPRIA 2013, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 5-7 June 2013; pp. 608-615
88. Marcello, J.; Eugenio, F.; Perdomo, U.; Medina, A. Assessment of Atmospheric Algorithms to Retrieve Vegetation in Natural Protected Areas Using Multispectral High Resolution Imagery. Sensors 2016, 60, 1624
89. Feilhauer, H.; Thonfeld, F.; Faude, U.; He, K.S.; Rocchini, D.; Schmidtlein, S. Assessing floristic composition with multispectral sensors-A comparison based on monotemporal and multiseasonal field spectra. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2013, 21, 218-229
90. Vuolo, F.; Zóltak, M.; Pipitone, C.; Zappa, L.;Wenng, H.; Immitzer, M.;Weiss, M.; Baret, F.; Atzberger, C. Data Service Platform for Sentinel-2 Surface Reflectance and Value-Added Products: System Use and Examples. Remote Sens. 2017, 8, 938