Policies for the promotion of inherent safety

New Solutions

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 46-52

  Ashford, Bynicholas A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037799524     PISSN: 10482911     EISSN: 15413772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/NS7.4.k     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ashford, N. A, Cozakos.A, Stone, R F. and Wessel, K 1988. The Design of Demonstration or Experimental Programs to Encourage Waste Reduction: An Incentives Analysis, Final Report to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science and Research.
2. Ashford, N. A 1991.“Policy Considerations for Anticipating and Preventing Accidents,” Proceedings of Enprotech '91 International Environmental Conference, Taiwan, 30-31 January 1991.
3. Ashford, N. A., Gobbel, J. V., Lachman, J., Matthiesen, M., Minzner, A and R F. Stone. 1993. The Encouragement of Technological Change for Preventing Chemical Accidents: Moving Firms from Secondary Prevention and Mitigation to Primary Prevention. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 1993.
4. Ashford, N., Banoutsos, I., Christiansen, K, Hummelmose, B. and Stratikopoulos, D. 1996. Evaluation of the Relevance for Worker Health and Safety of Existing Environmental Technology Data-bases for Cleaner and Inherently Safer Technologies: A Report to the European Commission, Aprll l996.
5. Ashford, N. A and Cote, R P. (eds) 1997. “Special Issue on Industrial Ecology,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 4(5)Fall 1997.
6. Caldart, C.C, and C.W.Ryan. 1985. “Waste Generation Reduction: AFirst Step Toward Developing a Regulatory Policy to Encourage Hazardous Substance Management through Production Process Change,” Hazardous Waste & Hazardous Materials, 2(3): pages 309-331.
7. Hall, H. I.,Haugh, G. S., Price-Green, P.A, Dhara, V.R, and Kaye, W.E. 1996.“Risk Factors for Hazardous Substance Releases That Result in Injuries and Evacuations: Data from 9 States,” American Journal of Public Health 86 (6): 855-857.
8. Hendershot, D.C. 1993, “Inherently Safer Plants,” Chapter 2 in Guidelines for Engineering Design for Process Safety, edited by the Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, N.Y.
9. Hirschhorn, J. S., and K U. Oldenburg. 1990. Prosperity Without Pollution: The Prevention Strategy for Industry and Consumers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
10. Kletz, T. A 1984. Cheaper, Safer Plants or Wealth and Safety at Work, The Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, Warwickshire, UK
11. Kletz, T. A. 1989. “Friendly Plants,” Process Safety Progress, (85): 18-26.
12. Kletz, T.A. 1991. Plant Design for Safety, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
13. Lutz, W.K 1995. “Take Chemistry and Physics into Consideration in all Phases of Chemical Plant Design,” Process Safety Progress 14(3): 153-160.
14. Papadakis, G. A and Amendola, A, 1997. Guidelines for the Development of the Safety Report Technical Note No. 1.97.22, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Systems, Informatics and Safety, Major Accident Hazards Bureau, Ispra (VA)-Italy, February 1997.
15. Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with HighRisk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
16. Von Moltke, K 1985, “Bhopal and Seveso - Avoiding a Recurrence,” The Environmental Forum, June 1985, pp 21-23.