Narratives of community engagement: A systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions

BMC Public Health

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Brunton, Ginny ^a   Thomas, James ^a   O'Mara Eves, Alison ^a   Jamal, Farah ^a   Oliver, Sandy ^a   Kavanagh, Josephine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community engagement; Conceptual framework; Health promotion; Public health; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMPOWERMENT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOTIVATION; NARRATIVE; PHILOSOPHY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THEORETICAL STUDY; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NARRATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EID: 85037706964     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE public health guidance 9: community engagement to improve health. London: NICE; 2008.
2. Department of Health. Commissioning and system management - PPE. Real involvement: working with people to improve health services. London: Department of Health; 2008.
3. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Reviews. 2012;1(1):28.
4. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(2):417-30.
5. O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, et al. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Public Health Res. 2013;1(4):548.
6. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. London: Sage; 1994.
7. Kneale D, Thomas J, Harris K. Developing and optimising the use of logic models in systematic reviews: exploring practice and good practice in the use of programme theory in reviews. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-26.
8. O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Thomas J. Techniques for identifying cross-disciplinary and 'hard-to-detect' evidence for systematic review. Research Synthesis Methods. 2014;5(1):50-9.
9. Brunton G, Stansfield C, Thomas J. Finding relevant studies. In: Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J, editors. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage; 2012.
10. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
11. Ritchie J, Lewis J, McNaughton Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2014.
12. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994.
13. Thomas J, Brunton J, Graziosi S. EPPI-reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis. London: EPPI-Centre software, social science research unit, institute of Education; 2010.
14. Bradshaw J. A taxonomy of social need. In: McLachlan G, editor. Problems and progress in medical care seventh series Nuffield Provisional Hospitals Trust: Open University Press; 1972.
15. Anastacio J, Gidley B, Hart L, Keith M, Mayo M, Kowarzik U. Reflecting realities: participants' perspectives on integrated communities and sustainable development. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2000.
16. Beresford P, Hoban M. Participation in anti-poverty and regeneration work and research: overcoming barriers and creating opportunities. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2005.
17. Birchall J, Simmons R. User power: the participation of users in public services. National Consumer Council; 2004.
18. Darbas T, Smith T, Hall C. Case studies of community engagement: enhancing community engagement for NRM in the SEQ western catchment. Queensland: CSIRO; 2007.
19. Office of the Deputy Prime M. National evaluation of local strategic partnerships: formative evaluation and action research programme 2002-2005. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2006.
20. Office of the Deputy Prime M. Neighbourhood wardens scheme evaluation. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2004.
21. Office of the Deputy Prime M. Evaluation of the residents' consultancy pilots initiative. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2004.
22. Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H. Constituting 'the public' in public participation. Public Adm. 2003;81(2):379-99.
23. Barnes M, Sullivan H, Matka E. The development of collaborative capacity in health action zones: a final report from the national evaluation. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2003.
24. Newman J, Barnes M, Sullivan H, Knops A. Public participation and collaborative governance. J Soc Policy. 2004;33(02):203-23.
25. Taylor M. Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Stud. 2007;44(2):297-317.
26. Simonsen-Rehn N, Ovretveit J, Laamanen R, Suominen S, Sundell J, Brommels M. Determinants of health promotion action: comparative analysis of local voluntary associations in four municipalities in Finland. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(4):274-83.
27. Bandura A. Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press; 1977.
28. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998;13:623-49.
29. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31:143-64.
30. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282-98.
31. Hawley A. Human ecology: a theory of community structure. New York: Ronald Press; 1950.
32. O'Neill M, Lemieux V, Groleau G, Fortin J-P, Lamarche PA. Coalition theory as a framework for understanding and implementing intersectoral health-related interventions. Health Promot Int. 1997;12(1):79-87.
33. Greenhalgh T, Bate P. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. London: BMJ Books; 2005.
34. Kawachi I, Kennedy B, Lochner K, Prothrow-Stith D. Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1491-8.
35. Griffiths J, Blair-Stevens C, Thorpe A. Social marketing for health and specialised health promotion, stronger together: weaker apart, shaping the future. London: RSPH, NSMC; 2008.
36. Audrey S, Holliday J, Parry-Langdon N, Campbell R. Meeting the challenges of implementing process evaluation within randomized controlled trials: the example of ASSIST (a stop smoking in schools trial). Health Educ Res 2006;21(3):366-377.
37. Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, et al. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9624):1595-602.
38. Fisher E, Auslander W, Sussman L, Owens N, Jackson-Thompson J. Community organization and health promotion in minority neighborhoods. Ethn Dis. 1992;2(3):252-72.
39. Jemmott LS, Brown EJ, Dodds S. Building community partnerships to improve HIV prevention efforts: implications for nurses. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 1998;9(3):29-40.
40. Starkey F, Moore L, Campbell R, Sidaway M, Bloor M. ASSIST. Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a school-based peer-led anti-smoking intervention in the UK: the ASSIST cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN55572965]. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):301.
41. Treno A, Holder H. Community mobilization: evaluation of an environmental approach to local action. Addiction. 1997;92(Suppl 2):S173-87.
42. Weinehall L, Hellsten G, Boman K, Hallmans G. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in Sweden: the Norsjö community intervention programme - motives, methods and intervention components. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(56 suppl):13-20.
43. Kegler MC, Swan DW. Advancing coalition theory: the effect of coalition factors on community capacity mediated by member engagement. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):572-84.
44. Matthews H. Citizenship, youth councils and young People's participation. J Youth Stud. 2001;4(3):299-318.
45. Flowers P, Hart GJ, Williamson LM, Frankis JS, Der GJ. Does bar-based, peer-led sexual health promotion have a community-level effect amongst gay men in Scotland? Int J STD AIDS. 2002;13(2):102-8.
46. Russell H. National evaluation of local strategic partnerships: issues paper: voluntary and community sector engagement in local strategic partnerships. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London; 2005.
47. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61(2):213-36.
48. Cornish F, Ghosh R. The necessary contradictions of 'community-led' health promotion: a case study of HIV prevention in an Indian red light district. Social science &. Medicine. 2007;64(2):496-507.
49. Hamer M, Box V. An evaluation of the development and functioning of the Boscombe network for change, a health alliance or partnership for health in Dorset. Health Educ J. 2000;59:238-52.
50. Ritchie D. Breathing space': reflecting upon the realities of community partnerships and workers' beliefs about promoting health. Health Educ J. 2001;60(1):73-92.
51. Ritchie D, Parry O, Gnich W, et al. Issues of participation, ownership and empowerment in a community development programme: tackling smoking in a low-income area in Scotland. Health Promot Int. 2004;19(1):51-9.
52. Williams M. Discursive Democracy and New Labour: Five Ways in Which Decision-Makers Manage Citizen Agendas in Public Participation Initiatives. Sociological Research Online. 2004;9(3):williams. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/3/williams.html.
53. Tan EJ, Xue QL, Li T, Carlson MC, Fried LP. Volunteering: a physical activity intervention for older adults - the experience corps program in Baltimore. J Urban Health. 2006;83(5):954-69.
54. Kim YH, Sarna L. An intervention to increase mammography use by Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31(1):105-10.
55. Holder HD, Moore RS. Institutionalization of community action projects to reduce alcohol-use related problems: systematic facilitators. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35(1-2):75-86.
56. Bickerstaff K, Walker G. Shared visions, unholy alliances: power, governance and deliberative processes in local transport planning. Urban Stud. 2005;42(12):2123-44.
57. Duffy B, Rose J, Butler S, Vince J. Views of new deal for communities - focus group report. London: MORI; 2005.
58. Blamey A, Ayana M, Lawson L, Mackinnon J, Paterson I, Judge K. Final report:the independent evaluation of have a heart paisley. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2004.
59. Rogers PJ. Using Programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation. 2008;14(1):29-48.
60. Educe L. Seeking the lessons: skills and knowledge Programme evaluation. Research report 19. London: Office of the Deputy Primer Minister; 2005.
61. Sridharan S, Gnich W, Moffat V, Bolton J, Harkins C, Hume M, et al. Independent evaluation of have a heart paisley phase 2. Edinburgh: Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change, University of Edinburgh; 2008.
62. McInroy N, MacDonald S. From community garden to Westminster: active citizenship and the role of public space. Centre for Local Economic Strategies: Manchester; 2005.
63. Goodlad R, Burton P, Croft J. Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 2005;23(6):923-38.
64. Bolam B, McLean C, Pennington A, Gillies P. Using new media to build social capital for health: a qualitative process evaluation study of participation in the CityNet project. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(2):297-308.
65. South J, Meah A, Bagnall A, Kinsella K, Branney P. People in public health: a study of approaches to develop and support people in public health roles. London: Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO. National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) Programme; 2010.
66. Rees R, Oliver S. Stakeholder perspectives and participation in reviews. In: Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J, editors. An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage; 2012.
67. Frick KD, Carlson MC, Glass TA, McGill S, Rebok GW, Simpson C, et al. Modeled cost-effectiveness of the experience corps Baltimore based on a pilot randomized trial. J Urban Health. 2004;81(1):106-17.
68. Swainston K, Summerbell C. The effectiveness of community engagement approaches and methods for health promotion interventions. Teeside: University of Teeside; 2008.
69. Wilcox D. Community participation and empowerment: putting theory into practice. RRA. Notes. 1994;21:78-82.
70. Popay J, Attree P, Hornby D, Milton B, Whitehead M, French B, et al. Community engagement in initiatives addressing the wider social determinants of health: a rapid review of evidence on impact, experience and process. University of Lancaster: Lancaster; 2007.
71. NHS Dudley Primary Care Trust. Your NHS Dudley. Dudley: Dudley Primary Care Trust; 2013.
72. Harden A, Oliver S. Who's listening? Systematically reviewing for ethics and empowerment. In: Oliver S, Peersman G, editors. Using research for effective health promotion. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2001.
73. Morgan LM. Community participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge. Health Policy Plan. 2001;16(3):221-30.
74. Barnes K, Friedman SM, Brickner N, Honig J. Impact of community volunteers on immunization rates of children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(5):518-24.
75. Popay J. Community engagement for health improvement: questions of definition, outcomes and evaluation. A background paper prepared for NICE. London: NICE; 2006.
76. Reijneveld SA, Westhoff MH, Hopman-Rock M. Promotion of health and physical activity improves the mental health of elderly immigrants: results of a group randomised controlled trial among Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands aged 45 and over. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(6):405-11.
77. Richardson G, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, et al. Cost effectiveness of the expert patients Programme (EPP) for patients with chronic conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(4):361-7.
78. Secker-Walker RH, Holland RR, Lloyd CM, Pelkey D, Flynn BS. Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking. Tob Control. 2005;14(1):37-42.
79. Davis SM, Clay T, Smyth M, Gittelsohn J, Arviso V, Flint WH, et al. Pathways curriculum and family interventions to promote healthful eating and physical activity in American Indian schoolchildren. Prev Med. 2003;37:S24-34.
80. Davis SM, Going SB, Helitzer DL, Teufel NI, Snyder P, Gittelsohn J, et al. Pathways: a culturally appropriate obesity-prevention program for American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(4 Suppl):796S-802S.
81. Davidson LL, Durkin MS, Kuhn L, O'Connor P, Barlow B, Heagarty MC. The impact of the safe kids/healthy neighborhoods injury prevention program in Harlem, 1988 through 1991. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(4):580-6.
82. Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Noyes J, Higgins JPT, Mayhew A, Pantoja T, et al. Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(11):1230-43.
83. Woodall JR, Warwick-Booth L, Cross R. Has empowerment lost its power? Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):742-5.
84. Draper AK, Hewitt G, Rifkin S. Chasing the dragon: developing indicators for the assessment of community participation in health programmes. Social science &. Medicine. 2010;71(6):1102-9.
85. O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):129.