Similarity-based methods for word sense disambiguation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 56-63

  Dagan, Ido ^a   Lee, Lillian ^b   Pereira, Fernando ^c  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BACKOFFS; BIGRAMS; ESTIMATION METHODS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION METHOD; SIMILARITY-BASED METHODS; TRAINING SETS; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

FREQUENCY ESTIMATION;

EID: 85037563276     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Brown, Peter F., Vincent J. DellaPietra, Peter V. deSouza, Jennifer C. Lai, and Robert L. Mercer. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. ComputationalLinguistics,18(4):467-479, December.
2. Church, Kenneth. 1988. A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 136-143.
3. Church, Kenneth W. and William A. Gale. 1991. A comparison of the enhanced Good-Turing and deleted estimation methods for estimating probabilites of english bigrams. Computer Speech and Language, 5:19-54.
4. Cover, Thomas M. and Joy A. Thomas. 1991. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley.
5. Dagan, Ido, Fernando Pereira, and Lillian Lee. 1994. Similarity-based estimation of word cooccurrence probabilities. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 272-278, Las Cruces, NM.
6. Essen, Ute and Volker Steinbiss. 1992. Co-occurrence smoothing for stochastic language modeling. In Proceedings of ICASSP, volume 1, pages 161-164.
7. Gale, William, Kenneth Church, and David Yarowsky. 1992. Work on statistcal methods for word sense disambiguation. In Working Notes, AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language, pages 54-60.
8. Good, I.J. 1953. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40(3 and 4):237-264.
9. Hoeffding, Wassily. 1965. Asymptotically optimal tests for nmttinomial distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages 369-401.
10. Jelinek, Frederick, Robert L. Mercer, and Salim Roukos. 1992. Principles of lexical language modeling for speech recognition. In In Sadaoki Furui and M. Mohan Sondhi, editors, Advances in Speech Signal Processing. Mercer Dekker, Inc., pages 651-699.
11. Karov, Yael and Shimon Edelman. 1996. Learning similarity-based word sense disambiguation from sparse data. In 4rth Workshop on Very Large Corpora.
12. Katz, Slava M. 1987. Estimation of probabilities from sparse data for the language model component of a speech recognizer. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speechand Signal Processing, ASSP-35(3):400-401, March.
13. Pereira, Fernando, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. 1993. Distributional clustering of English words. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 183-190, Columbus, OH.
14. Resnik, Philip. 1992. Wordnet and distributional analysis: A class-based approach to lexical discovery. AAAI Workshop on Statistically-based Natural Language Processing Techniques, pages 56-64, July.
15. Schiitze, Hinrich. 1992. Context space. In Working Notes, AAAI Fall Symposium on Probabilistic Approaches to Natural Language.