Unsupervised induction of modern standard Arabic verb classes

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Short Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 153-156

  Snider, Neal ^a   Diab, Mona ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

CLUSTERINGS; GOLD STANDARDS; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; MODERN STANDARDS; NOVEL TASK; SEMANTIC ELEMENT; STANDARD ARABICS; TREEBANKS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85037545106     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. M. Guerssel, K. Hale, M. Laughren, B. Levin, and J. White Eagle. 1985. A cross linguistic study of transitivity alternations. In Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, volume 21:2, pages 48-63. CLS, Chicago.
2. L. Kaufman and P.J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding Groups in Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3. Beth Levin. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Abdelgawad T. Mahmoud. 1991. A contrastive study of middle and unaccusative constructions in Arabic and English. In B. Comrie and M. Eid, editors, Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, volume 3, pages 119-134. Benjamins, Amsterdam.
5. Paola Merlo and Suzanne Stevenson. 2001. Automatic verb classification based on statistical distributions of argument structure. Computational Linguistics, 27(4).
6. C.J. Van Rijsbergen. 1979. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London.
7. Sabine Schulte im Walde. 2000. Clustering verbs semantically according to their alternation behaviour. In 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), Saarbrucken, Germany.