Adaptive collaborative restoration: A key concept in invasive plant management

Invasive Plants and Forest Ecosystems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 251-265

  Miller, James H ^a   Schelhas, John ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037543597     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Allen, S.L., Hepp, G.R., and Miller, J.H., Use of herbicides to control alligator weed and restore native plants in managed marshes, Wetlands, 27, 3, 739, 2007.
2. Barnes, T.G., Strategies to convert exotic grass pastures to tall grass prairie communities, Weed Technol., 18, 1364, 2004.
3. Botkin, D.B., The naturalness of biological invasions, West. North Am. Nat., 61, 261, 2001.
4. Britton, K.O., Duerr, D.A., II, and Miller, J.H., Understanding and controlling nonnative forest pests in the South, in Southern Forest Science: Past, Present, and Future, Rauscher, H.M. and Johnsen, K., Eds., General Technical Report GTR SRS-75, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Asheville, NC, 133, Chap. 14, 2004.
5. Bryson, C.T. and Carter, R., Biological pathways for invasive weeds, Weed Technol., 18, 1216, 2004.
6. Buck, L.E., Geisler, C.C., Schelhas, J., and Wollenberg, E., Eds., Biological Diversity: Balancing Interests through Adaptive Collaborative Management, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
7. Colfer, C.J.P., The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management, Resources for the Future and CIFOR, Washington, DC and Bogor, Indonesia, 2005.
8. Colton, T.F. and Alpert, P., Lack of public awareness of biological invasions by plants, Nat. Areas J., 18, 262, 1998.
9. D’Antonio, C.M., Jackson, N.E., Horvitz, C.C., and Hedberg, R., Invasive plants in wildland ecosystems: Merging the study of invasion processes with management needs, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 10, 513, 2004.
10. Environmental Law Institute, Halting the Invasion: State Tools for Invasive Species Management, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC, 112, 2002.
11. Evan, C.W., Moorhead, D.J., Bargeron, C.T., and Douce, G.K., Invasive Plants Responses to Silvicultural Practices in the South, Bugwood Network, BW-2006-03, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 51, 2006.
12. Ewel, J.J. and Putz, F.E., A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 7, 354, 2004.
13. Foxcroft, L.C., An adaptive management framework for linking science and management of invasive alien plants, Weed Technol., 18, 1275, 2004.
14. Harrington, T.B., Rader-Dixon, L.T., and Taylor, J.W., Jr., Kudzu (Pueraria montana) community responses to herbicides, burning, and high-density loblolly pine, Weed Sci., 51, 965, 2003.
15. Jordan, N., Becker, R., Gunsolus, J., White, S., and Damme, S., Knowledge networks: An avenue to ecological management of invasive weeds, Weed Sci., 51, 271, 2003.
16. Lee, K.N., Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Island Press, Washington, DC, 1993.
17. Liebhold, A.M., McDonald, W.L., Bergdahl, D., and Mastro, V.C., Invasion by exotic forest pests: A threat to forest ecosystems, For. Sci. Monogr., 30, 1, 1995.
18. Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F., Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control, Ecol. Appl., 10, 689, 2000.
19. McPherson, G.R., Linking science and management to mitigate impacts of nonnative plants, Weed Technol., 18, 1185, 2004.
20. Meyerson, L.A. and Reaser, J.K., Bioinvasions, bioterrorism, and biosecurity, Front. Ecol. Environ., 1, 307, 2003.
21. Midwest Invasive Plant Network, CWMA Cookbook: A Recipe for Success, Midwest Invasive Plant Network, Indianapolis, IN, 22, 2006.
22. Minteer, B.A. and Manning, R.E., Eds., Reconstructing Conservation: Finding Common Ground, Island Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
23. Moran, V.C., Hoffmann, J.H., and Zimmermann, H.G., Biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: Necessity, circumspection, and success, Front. Ecol. Environ., 3, 77, 2005.
24. NRC (National Research Council), Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
25. Otsamo, A., Adjers, G., Hadi, T.S., Kuusipalo, J., Tuomela, K., and Vuokko, R., Effects of site preparation and initial fertilization on the establishment and growth of four plantation tree species used in reforestation of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. dominated grasslands, For. Ecol. Manage., 73, 271, 1995.
26. Pal, R., Invasive plants threaten Segetal weed vegetation in South Hungary, Weed Technol., 18, 1314, 2004.
27. Pierre, B., A taxonomic, biogeographical and ecological overview of invasive woody plants, J. Veg. Sci., 7, 121, 1996.
28. Pimentel, D., Ed., Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species, CRC Press, Washington, DC, 369, 2002.
29. Plummer, R. and Armitage, D.R., Charting the new territory of adaptive co-management: A Delphi study, Ecol. Soc., 12, 2, 10 [online], Available at http://www.ecologyand society.org/vol12/iss2/art10/, 2007.
30. Sauer, L.J., The Once and Future Forest: A Guide to Forest Restoration Strategies, Island Press, Washington, DC, 380, 1998.
31. Schelhas, J., Buck, L., and Geisler, C., Introduction: The challenge of adaptive collaborative management, in Biological Diversity: Balancing Interests through Adaptive Collaborative Management, Buck, L., Geisler, C., Schelhas, J., and Wollenberg, E., Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, xix, 2001.
32. Schrader, G., A new working program on invasive alien species started by the multinational European organization dedicated to protecting plants, Weed Technol., 18, 1342, 2004.
33. Sheley, R.L. and Krueger-Mangold, J., Principles for restoring invasive plant-infested rangeland, Weed Sci., 51, 260, 2003.
34. Simberloff, D., Impacts of introduced species in the United States, Consequences, 2, 1, 1996.
35. Simberloff, D., Parker, I.M., and Windle, P.N., Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs, Front. Ecol. Environ., 3, 12, 2005.
36. Simberloff, D. and Stiling, P., How risky is biological control? Ecology, 77, 1965, 1996.
37. Taylor, J.P. and McDaniel, K.C., Revegetation strategies after saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) control in headwater, transitional, and depositional watershed areas, Weed Technol., 18, 1278, 2004.
38. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 391, 1993.
39. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station’s FIA Unit, Invasive plant database, Knoxville, TN, http://srsfia2.fs.fed.us/nonnative_invasive/southern_nonnative_invasives. htm, 2007.
40. Vitousek, P.M., D’Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., and Westbrooks, R., Biological invasions as global environmental change, Am. Sci., 84, 468, 1996.
41. Von der Lippe, M. and Kowarik, I., Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions, Conserv. Biol., 21, 986, 2006.
42. Walters, C., Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems, Conserv. Ecol. [online], 1, 2, 1, Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss2/art1/, 1997.
43. Westbrooks, R.G., New approaches for early detection and rapid response to invasive plants in the United States, Weed Technol., 18, 1469, 2004.