Refining the meaning of sense labels in PDTB: "concession"

Semantics in Text Processing, STEP 2008 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 207-219

  Robaldo, Livio ^a   Miltsakaki, Eleni ^b   Hobbs, Jerry R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMAL DESCRIPTION; LARGE PROGRAMS; SEMANTIC DESCRIPTIONS;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 85037540907     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Achinstein, P. (1965). 'Defeasible' Problems. The Journal of Philosophy 62(21), 629-633.
2. Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
3. Bach, E. (1981). On Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 63-81. Academic Press, New York.
4. Bell, J. (1999). Primary and secondary events. In M. Thielscher (Ed.), Proc. of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action and Change, pp. 65-72.
5. Bell, J. (2003). A common sense theory of causation. In P. Blackburn, C. Ghidini, R. Turner, and F. Giunchiglia (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context: Fourth International and Interdisciplinary Conference, Context 2003, Berlin, pp. 40-53. Springer- Verlag.
6. Giordano, L. and C. Schwind (2004). Conditional logic of actions and causation. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 239-279.
7. Giunchiglia, E., J. Lee, V. Lifschitz, N.McCain, and H. Turner (2004). Nonmonotonic causal theories. Artificial Intelligence 153(1-2), 49-104.
8. Hobbs, J. (1983). An Improper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In Proc. of the 21st AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 57-63.
9. Hobbs, J. (1995). Monotone Decreasing Quantifiers in a Scope-Free Logical Form. In K. van Deemter and S. Peters (Eds.), Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification, CSLI Lecture Notes, pp. 55-76. CSLI.
10. Hobbs, J. (1998). The Logical Notation: Ontological Promiscuity. In Discourse and Inference, Chapter 2.
11. Hobbs, J. (2005). Towards a Useful Notion of Causality for Lexical Semantics. Journal of Semantics 22(2), 181-209.
12. Kayser, D. and F. Nouioua (2008). From the Description of an Accident to its Causes. submitted to Artificial Intelligence.
13. McCarthy, J. (1977). Epistemological Problems of Artificial Intelligence. In Proc. of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1038-1044.
14. Miltsakaki, E., L. Robaldo, A. Lee, and A. Joshi (2008). Sense Annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proc. of Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Volume 4919 of LNCS, pp. 275-286. Springer.
15. Prasad, R., N. Dinesh, A. Lee, E. Miltsakaki, L. Robaldo, A. Joshi, and B. Webber (2008). The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation.
16. Prasad, R., E. Miltsakaki, N. Dinesh, A. Lee, A. Joshi, B. Webber, and L. Robaldo (2008). The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0. Annotation Manual. Technical Report IRCS-06-01, IRCS Technical Report, Institute of Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania.
17. Shoham, Y. (1990). Nonmonotonic reasoning and causation. Cognitive Science 14, 213-252.
18. Simon, H. (1991). Nonmonotonic reasoning and causation: Comment. Cognitive Science 49, 517-528.
19. Webber, B. and A. Joshi (2003). Anchoring a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar for discourse. In M. Stede, L. Wanner, and E. Hovy (Eds.), Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers: Proceedings of the Conference, pp. 86-92.
20. Webber, B., A. Joshi, M. Stone, and A. Knott (2003). Anaphora and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics 29(4), 545-587.