Towards an ISO standard for dialogue act annotation

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2548-2555

  Bunt, Harry ^a   Alexandersson, Jan ^a   Carletta, Jean ^a   Choe, Jae Woong ^a   Fang, Alex Chengyu ^a   Hasida, Koiti ^a   Lee, Kiyong ^a   Petukhova, Volha ^a   Popescu Belis, Andrei ^a   Romary, Laurent ^a   Soria, Claudia ^a   Traum, David ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS; DEPENDENCY RELATION; DIALOGUE ACTS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; ISO PROJECT; ISO STANDARDS; SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS; SEMANTIC INFORMATION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85037358031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Allen, J. and the TRAINS Team (1994) The TRAINS project: A case study in defining a conversational planning agent. Technical Report 532, University of Rochester.
2. Allen, J. & M. Core (1997) DAMSL: Dialogue Act Markup in Several Layers (Draft 2.1). http://www.cs.rochester.edu/research/ cisd/resources/damsl/RevisedManual/
3. Alexandersson, J., B. Buschbeck-Wolf, T. Fujinami, M. Kipp, S. Koch, E. Maier, N. Reithinger, B. Schmitz & M. Siegel (1998). Dialogue acts in VERBMOBIL-2. Verbmobil Report 226. Saarbrücken: DFKI.
4. Allwood, J. (1992). On dialogue cohesion. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 65. Gothenburg Univrsity.
5. Allwood, J. (2000) An activity-based approach to pragmatics. In: H. Bunt and W. Black, eds. Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue. Benjamins, Amsterdam, p. 47-80.
6. Bunt, H. (1994) Context and Dialogue Control. Think Quarterly 3, 19-34.
7. Bunt, H. (2000a) Dialogue Pragmatics and Context Specification. In: Harry Bunt & William Black (Eds.) Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue. Benjamins, Amsterdam, p. 81-150.
8. Bunt, H. (2005) A Framework for Dialogue Act Specification. 4th Joint ISO-SIGSEM Workshop on the Representation of Multimodal Semantic Information, Tilburg, January 2005. http://sigsem.uvt.nl/ wg/meeting4.fdas.pdf
9. th International Conference on Language Resources and Systems (LREC 2006), Genova.
10. ++ taxonomy for functional dialogue markup. In Proceedings AMAAS 2009 Workshop "Towards a Standard Markup Language for Embodied Dialogue Acts', Budapest.
11. Bunt, H. (2009b) Multifunctionality and multidimensional dialogue semantics. In Proc. DiaHolmia Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue', Stockholm.
12. Bunt, H. (2010). Multifunctionality in Dialogue. Forthcoming in Computers, Speech, and Language, Special Issue on Dialogue Modelling.
13. Bunt, H. and L. Romary (2002). Towards multimodal content representation. In Proc. LREC Workshop on International Standards of Terminology and Language Resources, Las Palmas, ELRA, Paris, p. 54-60.
14. Bunt, H. & Y. Girard (2005) Designing an open, multidimensional dialogue act taxonomy. In Proc. 9th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Nancy, 37-44.
15. Carletta, J., A. Isard, S. Isard, J. Kowtko & G. Doherty-Sneddon (1996) HCRC dialogue structure coding manual. Technical Report HCRC/TR-82.
16. Clark, H.H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambrudge, UK.
17. Core, M., M. Ishizaki, J. Moore, C. Nakatani, N. Reithinger, D. Traum & S. Tutiya (1998) Report of The Third DRI Workshop, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
18. Core & Allen (1997) Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL Annotation schema. AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, Boston, MA.
19. Dhillon, R., S. Bhagat, H. Carvey and E. Shriberg (2004) Meeting Recorder Project: Dialog Act Labeling Guide. Technical Report TR-04-002, ICSI, Berkeley.
20. Di Eugenio, B., P.W. Jordan and L. Pylkkänen (1998) The COCONUT project: dialogue annotation manual. ISP Technical Report 98-1, University of Pittsburgh.
21. Ide, N. and L. Romary (2003). International Standard for a Linguistic Annotation Framework. Natural Language Engineering 10: 211-225.
22. ISO DIS 24617-2 (2010) Language resource management - Semantic annotation framework (SemAF), Part 2: Dialogue acts. ISO, Geneva, January 2010.
23. Jurafsky, D., E. Schriberg, and D. Biasca (1997) Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shall-Discourse-Function Annotation Coders Manual. http://stripe.colorado.edu/$\sim$jurafsky/manual.august.html
24. LIRICS (2006a) D4.2, Preliminary set of semantic data categories. http://lirics.loria.fr.
25. LIRICS (2006b) D4.3, Documented compilation of semantic data categories. http://lirics.loria.fr.
26. LIRICS (2007) D4.4, Multilingual test suites for semanti-cally annotated data, http://lirics.loria.fr.
27. Petukhova, V. and H. Bunt (2009a) Dimensions of communication. Technical Report TR 2009-002, Tilburg center for Creative Computing, Tilburg University.
28. Petukhova, V. and H. Bunt (2009b) The independence of dimensions in multidimensional dialogue act annotation. In Proc. 2009 NAACL-HLT Conference, Boulder, Co.
29. Petukhova, V. and H. Bunt (2010) Introducing communicative function qualifiers. In Proc. ICGL 2010, Second International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources, Hong Kong, January 2010.
30. Popescu-Belis, A. (2005) Dialogue Acts: One or More Dimensions? ISSCO Working Paper 62, ISSCO, Geneva. http://www.issco.unige.ch/publications/working-papers/papers/ apb-issco-wp62b.pdf
31. Popescu-Belis, A. (2008) Dimensionality of Dialogue Act Tagsets: An Empirical Analysis of Large Corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 42(1): 99-107.
32. Traum, D. (1999) Speech Acts for Dialogue Agents. In: M. Wooldridge & A. Rao (Eds.) Foundations of rational agency, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 169-201.
33. Traum, D. & E. Hinkelman (1992) Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Computational Intelligence 3 (8): 575-599.
34. Traum, D. & S. Larsson (2003) The Information State Approach to Dialogue Act Management. In J. van Kup-pevelt & R. Smith (edr.) Current and new Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, Kluwer, Dordrecht.