Bounds on entanglement in qudit subsystems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 7-

  Kendon, Vivien M ^a   Życzkowski, Karol ^b   Munro, William J ^c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTER FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Poland)

^c HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037239585     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062310     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. D.P. DiVincenzo, Science 270, 255 (1995).
2. V. Vedral and M.B. Plenio, Prog. Quantum Electron. 22, 1 (1998).
3. B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2614 (1996).
4. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
5. K. Życzkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998).
6. M. Horodecki, Quantum Inf. Comput. 1, 3 (2001).
7. G. Vidal and R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002).
8. C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
9. V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, and P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997).
10. P. Stelmachovic and V. Bužek (unpublished).
11. R. Raussendorf and H.J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001).
12. D. Gunlycke, V.M. Kendon, V. Vedral, and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. A 64, 042302 (2001).
13. W.K. Wootters, e-print quant-ph/0001114.
14. K.M. O’Connor and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 63, 052302 (2001).
15. M. Koashi, V. Bužek, and N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. A 62, 050302(R) (2000).
16. V.M. Kendon, K. Nemoto, and W.J. Munro, J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1709 (2002).
17. R. Jozsa and N. Linden, e-print quant-ph/0201143.
18. K. Życzkowski and H.-J. Sommers, J. Phys. A 34, 7111 (2001).
19. D.N. Page, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1291 (1993).
20. S. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1 (1996).
21. S.K. Foong and S. Kanno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1148 (1994).
22. M.A. Nielsen and J. Kempe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5184 (2001).
23. D. Weaire and A.R. Williams, J. Phys. C 10, 1239 (1977).
24. P. Zanardi, C. Zalka, and L. Faoro, Phys. Rev. A 62, 030301(R) (2000).
25. E. Lubkin, J. Math. Phys. 19, 1028 (1978).
26. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
27. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998).
28. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
29. K. Życzkowski, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3496 (1999).
30. L. Gurvits and H. Barnum, e-print quant-ph/0204159.
31. P. Rungta, W.J. Munro, K. Nemoto, P. Deuar, G.J. Milburn, and C.M. Caves, in Directions in Quantum Optics: A Collection of Papers Dedicated to the Memory of Dan Walls, edited by H.J. Carmichael, R.J. Glauber, and M.O. Scully (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001), pp. 149–164.
32. P. Deuar, W.J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 2, 225 (2000).
33. A.O. Pittenger and M.H. Rubin, e-print quant-ph/0001110.
34. By “positive measure” we mean that we have divided the Hilbert space into two regions with measures of comparable size in (Formula presented) i.e., the ratio of the measures of the two parts is finite (neither infinite nor zero).
35. R. Lockhart and M. Steiner, e-print quant-ph/000909.
36. W.J. Munro, D.F.V. James, A.G. White, and P.G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030302 (2001).
37. S. Ishizaka and T. Hiroshima, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022310 (2000).
38. F. Verstraete, K. Audenaert, T.D. Bie, and B.D. Moor, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012316 (2001).
39. For two qubits, (Formula presented) is at the boundary of the maximal ball (PPT implies separable in this case, see also Ref. 30), which is why the exact results for the bounds for two qubits are the same [right-hand side of Eqs. (8) and (13) are equal]. But this isn’t so for (Formula presented) or (Formula presented) hence we get a different value for the bound from this method, in general. The states in between are maximally entangled mixed states, see, Refs. 353637.
40. M.L. Mehta, Matrix Theory (Hindustan Publishing, Delhi, 1989).