High-order above-threshold ionization: The uniform approximation and the effect of the binding potential

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 14-

  Figueira de Morisson Faria, C ^a   Schomerus, H ^b   Becker, W ^a  

^a MAX BORN INSTITUT   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037225850     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.043413     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. N. B. Delone and V. P. Krainov, Multiphoton Processes in Atoms (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
2. P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
3. L. F. DiMauro and P. Agostini, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 35, 79 (1995).
4. M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).
5. M. Lewenstein, K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and P. Bucksbaum, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1495 (1995).
6. R. Kopold, W. Becker, and M. Kleber, Opt. Commun. 179, 39 (2000).
7. P. Salières, B. Carré, L. Le Déroff, F. Grasbon, G. G. Paulus, H. Walther, R. Kopold, W. Becker, D. B. Milošević, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, Science 292, 902 (2001).
8. K. C. Kulander, K. J. Schafer, and J. L. Krause, in Super-Intense Laser-Atom Physics, Vol. 316 of NATO Advanced Studies Institute, Series B: Physics, edited by B. Piraux, A. L’Huillier, and K. Rza̧żewski (Plenum, New York, 1991), p. 95.
9. S. P. Goreslavskii and S. V. Popruzhenko, J. Phys. B 32, L531 (1999)
10. S. P. GoreslavskiiS. V. PopruzhenkoLaser Phys. 10, 583 (2000).
11. S. P. Goreslavskii and S. V. Popruzhenko, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 117, 895 (2000) [JETP 90, 778 (2000)].
12. N. Bleistein and R. A. Handelsman, Asymptotic Expansions of Integrals (Dover, New York, 1986).
13. M. V. Berry, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 422, 7 (1989).
14. H. Schomerus and M. Sieber, J. Phys. A 30, 4537 (1997).
15. I. J. Berson, J. Phys. B 8, 3078 (1975)
16. N. L. Manakov and L. P. Rapoport, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 69, 842 (1975) [Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 430 (1976)];
17. F. H. M. Faisal, P. Filipowicz, and K. Rza̧żewski, Phys. Rev. A 41, 6176 (1990)
18. Phys. Rev. AW. Becker, S. Long, and J. K. McIver, 42, 4416 (1990)
19. Phys. Rev. AP. S. Krstić, D. B. Milošević, and R. K. Janev, 44, 3089 (1991)
20. Phys. Rev. AG. F. Gribakin and M. Yu. Kuchiev, 55, 3760 (1997).
21. B. Borca, M. V. Frolov, N. L. Manakov, and A. F. Starace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 193001 (2002).
22. For a recent measurement of the photodetachment spectrum in (Formula presented) see R. Reichle, H. Helm, and I. Yu. Kyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 243001 (2001).
23. For a recent review, see W. Becker, F. Grasbon, R. Kopold, D. B. Milošević, G. G. Paulus, and H. Walther, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 48, 35 (2002).
24. P. Hansch, M. A. Walker, and L. D. Van Woerkom, Phys. Rev. A 55, R2535 (1997)
25. M. P. Hertlein, P. H. Bucksbaum, and H. G. Muller, J. Phys. B 30, L197 (1997)
26. H. G. Muller and F. C. Kooiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1207 (1998)
27. Phys. Rev. Lett.H. G. Muller, 83, 3158 (1999)
28. M. J. Nandor, M. A. Walker, L. D. Van Woerkom, and H. G. Muller, Phys. Rev. 60, R1771 (1999)
29. E. Cormier, D. Garzella, P. Breger, P. Agostini, P. Chériaux, and C. Leblanc, J. Phys. B 34, L9 (2001).
30. G. G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 64, 021401(R) (2001)
31. Phys. Rev. AC. Figueira de Morisson Faria, R. Kopold, W. Becker, and J. M. Rost, 65, 023404 (2002)
32. R. Kopold, W. Becker, M. Kleber, and G. G. Paulus, J. Phys. B 35, 217 (2002)
33. B. Borca, A. F. Starace, A. V. Flegel, M. V. Frolov, and N. L. Manakov, Phys. Rev. A 65, 051402(R) (2002).
34. D. B. Milošević and F. Ehlotzky, Phys. Rev. A 57, 5002 (1998)
35. Phys. Rev. AD. B. MiloševićF. Ehlotzky58, 3124 (1998).
36. L. V. Keldysh, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1945 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965)];
37. F. H. M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 6, L89 (1973)
38. H. R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1786 (1980).
39. A. Lohr, M. Kleber, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. A 55, R4003 (1997).
40. S. P. Goreslavskii and S. V. Popruzhenko, Phys. Lett. A 249, 477 (1998)
41. S. P. GoreslavskiiS. V. PopruzhenkoPis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 68, 858 (1998) [JETP Lett. 68, 902 (1998)].
42. R. Kopold and W. Becker, J. Phys. B 32, L419 (1999).
43. In practice, the tunneling picture is still applicable if (Formula presented)
44. In the case of just one variable, as is the case in the direct amplitude (1), all these statements can be illustrated in a straightforward graphical fashion; for an example, see R. Kopold, Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München, 2001.
45. G. G. Paulus, W. Becker, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4043 (1995).
46. Both the imaginary parts are positive: As a rule, any saddle that has a negative imaginary part of the action cannot be visited by the steepest-descent contour. This is so because in the original integration the action was real (Formula presented) and the deformation procedure does not lead to an increase of (Formula presented) by construction.
47. T. Poston and I. N. Stewart, Catastrophe Theory and its Applications (Pitman, London, 1978).
48. Even though the amplitude (2) contains both rescattered and direct electrons, in the context of the saddle-point and the uniform approximation, it is preferable to calculate the direct electrons from amplitude (1) and then, to avoid double counting their contribution, to disregard very short quantum orbits (Formula presented) in the amplitude (2); cf. R. Kopold and W. Becker, in Multiphoton Processes, edited by Louis F. DiMauro, Richard R. Freeman, and Kenneth Kulander, AIP Conf. Proc. 525 (AIP, Melville, NY, 2000), p. 11.
49. For elliptical polarization, the energy range where direct and rescattered electrons interfere is larger, owing to the faster drop of the rescattered electrons for increasing energy. Indeed, interference between direct and rescattered electrons has been observed in this case both in the experiment and in theory; see G. G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, A. Dreischuh, H. Walther, R. Kopold, and W. Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3791 (2000).
50. E. Cormier and P. Lambropoulos, J. Phys. B 30, 77 (1997).
51. T. Brabec and F. Krausz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 545 (2000).
52. Note that, in addition, for the same parameters as in Ref. 32, the matrix element (35) is singular, such that a direct comparison would not be possible.
53. Note that our results include the phase-space factor; that is, all of our spectra plot the quantity (Formula presented)
54. E. E. B. Campbell, K. Hansen, K. Hoffmann, G. Korn, M. Tchaplyguine, M. Wittmann, and I. V. Hertel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2128 (2000).
55. G. P. Arrighini, C. Guidotti, and N. Durante, Phys. Rev. A 35, 1528 (1987)
56. Phys. Rev. AS. H. Patil, 46, 3855 (1992).
57. The excursion amplitude (Formula presented) is the amplitude of the oscillatory motion of a classical electron in the laser field (9).
58. C. Figueira de Morisson Faria and W. Becker (unpublished).