Reply to “Comment on ‘Structure of ferrofluid dynamics’ ”

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1-

  Müller, Hanns Walter ^a   Liu, Mario ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85037211540     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.043202     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. H.W. Müller and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. E 64, 061405 (2001).
2. This is not true for the third, rather younger version, specifically constructed, again in a comment [M. Shliomis, Phys. Rev. E 64, 063501 (2001)] on the work of
3. Phys. Rev. EB.U. Felderhof and H.J. Kroh, 62, 3848 (2000).
4. S. Odenbach and H.W. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 037202 (2002).
5. H.W. Müller and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. E 67, 031201 (2003)
6. H.W. Müller and M. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067201 (2002). We have no doubt that our theory displays the proper structure to ensure conservation laws under all circumstances, as this is the point we focused on. So we expect experiments to prove us right. But we are even surer that this would not in any way diminish Shliomis’ outstanding and enduring contributions.