Seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct: errors and integrity

Anaesthesia

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 125-126

  Kharasch, E D ^a   Houle, T T ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; LANGUAGE; LETTER; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; PERSONNEL; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 85037041209     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14147     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. Carlisle JB. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 944–52.
2. Klein AA. What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 3–4.
3. Carlisle JB, Dexter F, Pandit JJ, Shafer SL, Yentis SM. Calculating the probability of random sampling for continuous variables in submitted or published randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 848–58.
4. Carlisle JB, Loadsman JA. Evidence for non-random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh. Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 17–27.
5. Kharasch ED, Houle TT. Errors and integrity in seeking and reporting apparent research misconduct. Anesthesiology 2017; 127: 733–7.
6. Senn SJ. Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 1989; 8: 467–75.
7. Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13: 1715–26.
8. Nguyen TL, Collins GS, Lamy A, et al. Simple randomization did not protect against bias in smaller trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017; 84: 105–13.
9. Mascha EJ, Vetter TR, Pittet JF. An appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher method for assessing study data integrity and fraud. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2017; 125: 1381–5.
10. Loadsman JA, McCulloch TJ. Widening the search for suspect data – is the flood of retractions about to become a tsunami? Anaesthesia 2017; 72: 931–5.
11. Allison DB, Brown AW, George BJ, Kaiser KA. Reproducibility: a tragedy of errors. Nature 2016; 530: 27–9.