CONVERSATIONAL INTERFACES: ADVANCES AND CHALLENGES

5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages KN09-KN18

  Zue, Victor ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVERSATIONAL INTERFACE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERFACES; HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION ACCESS; LANGUAGE GENERATION; RESEARCH CHALLENGES; RESEARCH ISSUES; SPOKEN DIALOGUE; SPOKEN LANGUAGES; TRANSACTIONAL PROCESSING;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85036693931     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Asadi, A., Schwartz, R., and Makhoul, J. “Automatic Modelling for Adding New Words to a Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition System,” Proc. ICASSP, 305-308, 1991.
2. Bernsen, N. O., Dybkjaer, L. and Dybkjaer, H. “Cooperativity in Human-Machine and Human-Human Spoken Dialogue,” Discourse Processes, Vol. 21, No. 2, 213-236, 1996.
3. Blomberg, M., Carlson, R., Elenius,K., Granstrom, B., Gustafson, J., Hunnicutt, S., Lindell, R., and Neovius, L. “An Experimental Dialogue System: Waxholm,” Proc. Eurospeech, 1867-1870, 1993.
4. Bobrow, R., Ingria, R., and Stallard, R. “Syntactic and Semantic Knowledge in the DELPHI Unification Grammar,” Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 230-236, 1990.
5. Butzberger, J., Murveit, H., and Weintraub, M. “Spontaneous Speech Effects in Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition Applications,” Proc. ARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 339-344, 1992.
6. Carlson, R. and Hunnicutt, S. “Generic and Domain-Specific Aspects of the Waxholm NLP and Dialogue Modules,” Proc. ICSLP, 677-680, 1996.
7. Chow, Y. and Schwartz, R. “The N-Best Algorithm: An Efficient Procedure for Finding Top N Sentence Hypotheses,” Proc. ARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 199-202, 1989.
8. Dalsgaard, P., Larsen L.B., B., and Thomsen, I. (Eds.) Proceedings of the ESCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems: Theory and Application, Vigsø, Denmark, 1995
9. Eckert, W., Kuhn, T., Niemann, H., Rieck, S., Scheuer, A., and Schukat-Talamazzini, E.G. “A Spoken Dialogue System for German Intercity Train Timetable Enquiries,” Proc. Eurospeech, 1871-1874, 1993.
10. Glass, J., Polifroni, J., and Seneff, S. “Multilingual Language Generation Across Multiple Domains,” Proc. ICSLP'94. 983-976, 1994.
11. Glass, J., Flammia, G., Goodine, D. Phillips, M., Polifroni, J. Sakai, S., Seneff, S., and Zue, V. “Multilingual Spoken-language Understanding in the MIT Voyager System,” Speech Communication. 17 1-18, 1995.
12. Glass, J., Chang, J., and McCandless, M. “A probabilistic framework for feature-based speech recognition,” In Proc. ICSLP, 2277-2280, 1996.
13. Goddeau, D. “Using Probabilistic Shift-Reduce Parsing in Speech Recognition Systems,” Proc. ICSLP, 321-324, 1992.
14. Goddeau, D., Brill, E., Glass, J., Pao, C., Phillips, M., Polifroni, J. Seneff, S. and Zue, V. “Galaxy: A Human-Language Interface to On-Line Travel Information,” Proc. ICSLP, 707-710, 1994.
15. Goodine, D., Seneff, S., Hirschman, L., Phillips, M. “Full Integration of Speech and Language Understanding in the MIT Spoken Language System,” Proc. Eurospeech, 845-848, 1991.
16. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. “Plans for Discourse,” in Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, 1990.
17. Hetherington, I.L. and Zue, V. “New Words: Implications for Continuous Speech Recognition,” Proc. Eurospeech, 475-931, 1991.
18. Huang, X. “WHISTLER: A Trainable Text-toSpeech System,” Proc. ICSLP, 2387-2390.
19. Jackson, E., Appelt, D., Bear, J., Moore, R., and Podlozny, A. “A Template Matcher for Robust NL Interpretation,” Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 190-194, 1991.
20. Jurafsky, D., Wooters, C., Tajchman, G., Segal, J., Stolcke, A., Fosler, E., and Morgan, N. “The Berkeley Restaurant Project,” Proc. ICSLP, 2139-2142, 1994.
21. Lau, R., Flammia, G., Pao, C., and Zue, V. “Web-Galaxy - Integrating Spoken Language and Hypertext Navigation,” These Proceedings.
22. Massaro, D. Perceiving Talking Faces: From Speech Perception to a Behavioral Principle, MIT Press, (to appear).
23. Meng, H., Busayapongchai, S., Glass, J., Goddeau, D., Hetherington, L., Hurley, E., Pao, C., Polifroni, J., Seneff, S., and Zue, V. “A Conversational System in the Automobile Classifieds Domain,” Proc. ICSLP, 542-545, 1996.
24. Miller, S., Schwartz, R., Bobrow, R., and Ingria, R., “Statistical Language Processing Using Hidden Understanding Models,” Proc. ARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 278-282, 1994.
25. Moore, R., Appelt, D., Dowding, J. Gawron, J., and Moran, D. “Combining Linguistic and Statistical Knowledge Sources in Natural-Language Processing for ATIS,” Proc. ARPA Spoken Language Systems Workshop, 261-264, 1995.
26. Oviatt, S. L. “Multimodal Interfaces for Dynamic Interactive Maps”, Proc. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI'96, 95-102, 1996.
27. Pallett, D., Fiscus, J., Fisher, W., and Garafolo, J., Lund, B., Martin, A., and Pryzbocki, M. “Benchmark Tests for the ARPA Spoken Language Program,” Proc. ARPA Spoken Language Systems Technology Workshop, 5-36, 1995.
28. Pan, S. and McKeown, K. “Spoken Language Generation in a Multimedia System,” Proc. ICSLP, 374-377, 1996.
29. Peckham J. “A New Generation of Spoken Dialogue Systems: Results and Lessons from the SUNDIAL Project,” Proc. Eurospeech, 33-40, 1992.
30. Pieraccini, R., Levin, E. and Lee, C.H. “Stochastic Representation of Conceptual Structure in the Atis Task,” Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop. 121-124, 1992.
31. Price, P. “Evaluation of Spoken Language Systems: the Atis Domain,” Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 91-95, 1990.
32. Rudnicky, A., Lunati, J-M., and Franz, A. “Spoken Language Recognition in an Office Management Domain,” Proc. ICASSP, 829-832, 1991.
33. Sagisaka, Y., Kaiki, N., Iwahashi, N., and Mimura, K. “ATR ν-Talk Speech Synthesis System,” Proc. ICSLP, 483-486, 1992.
34. Seneff, S. “Tina: A Natural Language System for Spoken Language Applications,” Computational Linguistics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 61-86, 1992.
35. Seneff, S. “Robust Parsing for Spoken Language Systems,” Proc. ICASSP. 189-192, 1992.
36. Seneff, S., Zue, V. Polifroni, J., Pao, C., Hetherington, L., Goddeau, D., and Glass, J. “The Preliminary Development of a Displayless Pegasus System,” Proc. ARPA Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 212-217, 1995.
37. Seneff, S. and Polifroni, J. “A New Restaurant Guide Conversational System: Issues in Rapid Prototyping for Specialized Domain,” Proc. ICSLP, 665-668, 1996.
38. Seneff, S. Goddeau, D., Pao, C., and Polifroni, J. “Multimodal Discourse Modelling in a Multi-User Multi-Domain Environment,” Proc. ICSLP, 188-191, 1996.
39. Stallard, D. and Bobrow, R. “Fragment Processing in the DELPHI System,” Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop. 305-310, 1992.
40. Sutton, S., Kaiser, E., Cronk, A., and Cole,R. “Bringing Spoken Language Systems to the Classroom,” These Proceedings.
41. Wang, C. Glass, J., Meng, H., Polifroni, J., Seneff, S., and Zue, V. “Yinhe: A Mandarin Chinese Version of the Galaxy System'” These Proceedings.
42. Ward, W. “Modelling Non-Verbal Sounds for Speech Recognition,” Proc. DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 47-50, 1989.
43. Ward, W. “The CMU Air Travel Information Service: Understanding Spontaneous Speech,” Proc. ARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, 127-129, 1990.
44. Ward, W. “Integrating Semantic Constraints into the SPHINX-II Recognition Search,” Proc. ICASSP, II-17-20, 1994.
45. Zue, V., Seneff, S., Polifroni, J., Phillips, M., Pao, C., Goddeau, D., Glass, J., and Brill, E. “Pegasus: A Spoken Language Interface for On-Line Air Travel Planning,” Speech Communication, 15, 331-340, 1994.
46. Zue, V. “Navigating the Information Superhighway Using Spoken Language Interfaces,” IEEE Expert, vol. 10, no. 5, 39-43, 1995.
47. Zue, V., Seneff, S., Glass, J., Hetherington, L., Hurley, E., Meng, H., Pao, C., Polifroni, J., Schloming, R., and Schmid, P. “From Interface to Content: Translingual Access and Delivery of On- Line Information,” These Proceedings.