Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Surgical Training—A Randomized Control Trial

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 2018, Pages 1065-1072

  Pulijala, Yeshwanth ^a   Ma, Minhua ^b   Pears, Matthew ^a   Peebles, David ^a   Ayoub, Ashraf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; EYE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LE FORT I OSTEOTOMY; LIKERT SCALE; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; MOTION; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESIDENT; SELF EVALUATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SKILL; STUDENT; SURGERY; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; LE FORT OSTEOTOMY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORAL SURGERY; PROCEDURES; SELF CONCEPT; SIMULATION TRAINING; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; SELF CONCEPT; SIMULATION TRAINING; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURGERY, ORAL; UNITED KINGDOM; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 85036578049     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: 15315053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bandura, A., Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Pajares, F., Urdan, T., (eds.) Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents Adolescence and Education Series, Vol 5, 2006, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC.
2. Cervone, D., Thinking about self-efficacy. Behav Modif, 24, 2000, 30.
3. Bucholz, E.M., Sue, G.R., Yeo, H., et al. Our trainees' confidence: Results from a national survey of 4136 US general surgery residents. Arch Surg, 146, 2011, 907.
4. Baldwin, P., Dodd, M., Wrate, R., Junior doctors making mistakes. Lancet, 351, 1998, 804.
5. Pelargos, P.E., Nagasawa, D.T., Lagman, C., et al. Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci, 35, 2017, 1.
6. Geoffrion, R., Lee, T., Singer, J., Validating a self-confidence scale for surgical trainees. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 35, 2013, 355.
7. Rodriguez-Paz, J., Kennedy, M., Salas, E., et al. Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: Toward a different training paradigm. Qual Saf Health Care, 18, 2009, 63.
8. Elfenbein, D.M., Confidence crisis among general surgery residents: A systematic review and qualitative discourse analysis. JAMA Surg, 151, 2016, 1166.
9. Binenbaum, G., Musick, D.W., Ross, H.M., The development of physician confidence during surgical and medical internship. Am J Surg, 193, 2007, 79.
10. Flin, R., Mitchell, L., (eds.) Safer Surgery: Analysing Behaviour in the Operating Theatre, 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Klingensmith, M.E., Brunt, L.M., Focused surgical skills training for senior medical students and interns. Surg Clin North Am, 90, 2010, 505.
12. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Taskforce report on the impact of the European Working Time Directive. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news-and-events/media-centre/press-releases/taskforce-report-on-impact-of-european-working-time-directive/ Accessed March 2, 2017.
13. Elsey, E.J., Griffiths, G., Humes, D.J., West, J., Meta-analysis of operative experiences of general surgery trainees during training. Br J Surg, 104, 2017, 22.
14. Hupp, J.R., Surgical training: Is dabbling enough?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 69, 2011, 1535.
15. Leahy, P., We'll need more than 48 hours to change EWTD rules. RCS Bull, 99, 2017, 41.
16. Verrier, E.D., The elite athlete, the master surgeon. J Am Coll Surg, 224, 2017, 225.
17. Roy, E., Bakr, M.M., George, R., The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review. Saudi Dent J, 29, 2017, 41.
18. Pulijala, Y., VR surgery [video]. Vimeo; 2017 Available at: https://vimeo.com/197772557. (Accessed 15 March 2017)
19. Lombard, M., Ditton, T., At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J Comput Commun, 3, 1997, 0.
20. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., Lang, A.-G., Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods, 41, 2009, 1149.
21. GraphPad. GraphPad Prism 7 2017. Available at: https://www.graphpad.com. (Accessed 12 February 2017)
22. Dunning, D., Heath, C., Suls, J.M., Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Publ Interest, 5, 2004, 69.
23. Coolican, H., Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. ed 6, 2014, Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
24. Pulijala, Y., Surgical trainees' response to virtual reality 2017. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb6yRK4o9mk&feature=youtu.be. (Accessed 4 May 2017)
25. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., Kruger, J., Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 12, 2003, 83.
26. Khor, W.S., Baker, B., Amin, K., et al. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery—The digital surgical environment: Applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med, 4, 2016, 454.
27. Serjeant, J., The NHS technology lag cannot go on. 2016 (updated April 17, 2016. Available at: http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/blog/nhs-technology-lag-cannot-go. (Accessed 17 April 2016)
28. Vinden, C., Malthaner, R., McGee, J., et al. Teaching surgery takes time: The impact of surgical education on time in the operating room. Can J Surg, 59, 2016, 87.