Criteria for identifying and annotating caused motion constructions in corpus data

Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1297-1304

  Hwang, Jena D ^a   Zaenen, Annie ^b   Palmer, Martha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Caused motion constructions; Lexical semantics; Semantic coercion; Sentence representation; VerbNet

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

LEXICAL SEMANTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS; SEMANTIC TYPES; SENTENCE REPRESENTATION; TEST DATA; VERBNET;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85036459781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Claire Bonial, Susan Windisch Brown, William Corvey, Martha Palmer, Volha Petukhova, and Harry Bunt. 2011. An exploratory comparison of thematic roles in VerbNet and LIRICS. In The Sixth Joint ISO-ACL SIGSEM Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation.
2. Adele E. Goldberg and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80(3):532-568, September.
3. Adele E. Goldberg. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University Of Chicago Press.
4. Dan Guildea and Martha Palmer. 2002. The necessity of parsing for predicate argument recognition. In 40th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, July.
5. George Hripcsak and Adam S Rothschild. 2005. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 12(3):296-298.
6. Jena D. Hwang, Rodney D. Nielsen, and Martha Palmer. 2010. Towards a domain independent semantics: Enhancing semantic representation with construction grammar. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT Workshop on Extracting and Using Constructions in Computational Linguistics, pages 1-8, Los Angeles, California, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Jena D. Hwang, Martha Palmer, and Annie Zaenen. 2013. Representing paths of motion in representing paths of motion in VerbNet. In Tracy Holloway King and Valeria de Paiva, editors, From Quirky Case to Representing Space. CSLI Online Publications.
8. Ray Jackendoff. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Karin Kipper, Anna Korhonen, Neville Ryant, and Martha Palmer. 2008. A large-scale classification of English verbs. Language Resources and Evaluation Journal, 42(1):21-40.
10. George Lakoff. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony, editor, Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
11. Beth Levin. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press.
12. Mitchell Marcus, Grace Kim, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, Robert Macintyre, Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Britta Schasberger. 1994. The penn treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, pages 114-119.
13. Malka Rappaport-Hovav and Beth Levin. 2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 44(01):129-167, March.
14. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 2.
15. Annie Zaenen, Cleo Condoravdi, and Danny Bobrow. 2008. The encoding of lexical implications in VerbNet predicates of change of locations. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco, May. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).