African Peer Review Mechanism: An assessment

India Quarterly

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 138-168

  Kebonang, Zein ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85035288513     PISSN: 9749284     EISSN: 9752684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097492840506100206     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akokpari, J (2004). “Policing and Preventing Human Right Abuses in Africa: The OAU, The AU and The NEPAD Peer Review, International Journal of Legal Information, 32: 461-472.
2. Athukorala, P.C (2002). “Malaysian Trade Policy and the 2001 WTO Trade Policy Review”, World Economy, 25 (10): 1297-1317.
3. Bekoe, D.A (2003) “Creating A Reliable African Peer Review Mechanism”, USA Africa Institute, 1 (4): 2-9.
4. Berlinski, J (2000). “The WTO Trade Policy Review of Argentina 1999”, World Economy, 23 (9): 1195-1213.
5. Boswell, N (2003). “The Impact of International Law on Domestic Governance”, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 93: 133-137.
6. Cillier, J (2002). “NEPAD’s Peer Review Mechanism”, Institute of Security Studies, Occasional Paper No. 64, http://www.iss.co.za/Pubs/Papers/64/Paper64.html.
7. Constitutive Act of the African Union, http://www/au2002.gov.za/docs/key_oau/au_act.htm.
8. Chayes, A and Chayes, A.H (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
9. Crossen, T (2004). “Multilateral Environment Agreements and the Compliance Continuum”, Georgetown International Environment Law Review, 16: 473-500.
10. Ehrmann, M (2002). “Procedures of Compliance Control in International Environmental Treaties”, Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 13:377-442.
11. Evers, B (2003). “Linking Trade and Poverty: Reinventing the Trade Policy Review Mechanism”, paper prepared for the Research Project on “Linking the WTO to the Poverty Reduction Agenda, Globalisation and Poverty Research Programme, University of Manchester, UK.
12. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering: Annual Review of Non-Cooperative Counties and Territories, 20 June (2003).
13. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering: More About the FAFT and its Work. http://www.1.oecd.org/fatf/aboutFAFT_en.htm.
14. Francois, J.F (1999). “Maximizing the Benefits of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism for Developing Countries”, Tinbergen Institute and CEPR.
15. Frischmann, B (2003). “A Dynamic Institutional Theory of International Law”, Buffalo Law Review, 51% 681-809.
16. Head, K and Ries, J (2004). “Regionalism Within Multilateralism: The WTO Trade Policy Review of Canada”, World Economy, 27 (9): 1377-1399.
17. Herbert, R (2003). “Peer Review: Who Owns the Process?” Africa, 1:9.
18. Herbst, J and Mills, G (2003). “NEPAD and the AU: Towards a New Order?” The Adelphi Papers, 361 (1): 49-64.
19. Juma, M.K (2004). “Africa’s Governance Audit: The African Peer Review Mechanism”, New Economy, 178-180.
20. Kanbur R (2004). “The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM): An Assessment of Concept and Design”, www.people.cornell.edu/pages/sk145.
21. Kebonang, Z (2003). “Africa and the Commonwealth: Moving from a Symbolic to a More Meaningful Relationship”, Indian Journal of African Affairs, 43 (2): 36-48.
22. Keasing, D.B (1997). “Trade Practices Laid Bare: Further Improving the WTO’s Trade Policy Review mechanism”, Institute for International Economics, USA.
23. Kotze, H and Steyn, C (2003) African Elite Perspectives: AU and NEPAD, A Comparative Study Across Seven African Countries, Cape Town, South Africa: Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung Publishers.
24. Matsuhita, M; Schoenbaum, T.J and Mavroidis, P.C (2003). The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice and Policy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
25. Milner, C (2004). “Trade Policy in Burundi: Reform Without Political Stability”, World Economy, 27 (9): 1363-1399.
26. Ngamau, R (2004). “The Role of NEPAD in African Economic Regulation and Integration”, Law and Business Review Americas, 10: 515-544.
27. Pagani, F (2002). “Peer Review: A Tool for Cooperation and Change. An Analysis of an OECD Working Method”, OECD Working Paper SG/LEG (2002) 1, Paris, France.
28. OECD (2003). Peer Review: A Tool for Co-operation and Change”, Paris, France.
29. Schaefer, A (2004). “A New and Effective Form of Governance? Comparing the OMC to Multi-lateral Surveillance by the IMF and the OECD”, paper presented at the Conference of Europeanists, March 11-13, Chicago, USA.
30. The African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM); Base Document (NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU/ANNEX II).
31. The African Peer Review Mechanism: Memorandum of Understanding on the African Peer Review Mechanism (NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU.
32. The African Peer Review Mechanism Organisation and Processes (NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/GUIDELINES/O&P).
33. The African Peer Review Mechanism: Objectives, Standards, Criteria and Indicators (NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/GUIDELINES/OSCI).
34. The IMF Article IV Consultation: Obligations Regarding Exchange Arrangement, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/aa04.htm.
35. The New Partnership For Africa’s Development NEPAD Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and Corporate Governance (NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU/Annexl).
36. The Trade Policy Review Mechanism, Annex 3, The World Trade Organization.
37. Udombana, N, J (2002). “A Harmony or a Cacophony? The Music of Integration in the African Union Treaty and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development”, Indiana International and Comparative Law Review, 13: 185-236.
38. Zhang, X (2003). “Implementation of the WTO Agreement: Framework and Reform”, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 23: 383-431.