Random-bond Potts model in the large-q limit

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 7-

  Juhász, Róbert ^a,b   Rieger, Heiko ^c   Iglói, Ferenc ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^b WIGNER RESEARCH CENTRE FOR PHYSICS   (Hungary)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d LABORATOIRE DE CRISTALLOGRAPHIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85035264163     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.056122     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. A.B. Harris, J. Phys. C 7, 1671 (1974).
2. J.T. Chayes, L. Chayes, D.S. Fisher, and T. Spencer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2999 (1986).
3. A.W.W. Ludwig, Nucl. Phys. B 285, 97 (1987);
4. Nucl. Phys. BA.W.W. Ludwig330, 639 (1990);
5. Nucl. Phys. BA.W.W. Ludwig and J.L. Cardy, 330, 687 (1990);
6. Nucl. Phys. BVl. Dotsenko, M. Picco, and P. Pujol, 455, 701 (1995);
7. M.A. Lewis, Europhys. Lett. 43, 189 (1998).
8. M. Aizenman and J. Wehr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2503 (1989).
9. Y. Imry and M. Wortis, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3580 (1979).
10. K. Hui and A.N. Berker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2507 (1989).
11. For a recent numerical study about the 3D random-Potts model see C. Chatelain, B. Berche, W. Janke, and P.E. Berche, e-print cond-mat/0103377.
12. W. Kinzel and E. Domany, Phys. Rev. B 23, 3421 (1981).
13. R.J. Baxter, J. Phys. C 6, L445 (1973).
14. S. Chen, A.M. Ferrenberg, and D.P. Landau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1213 (1992);
15. S. ChenA.M. FerrenbergD.P. LandauPhys. Rev. E 52, 1377 (1995);
16. Phys. Rev. ES. Wiseman and E. Domany, 51, 3074 (1995).
17. M. Kardar, A.L. Stella, G. Sartoni, and B. Derrida, Phys. Rev. E 52, R1269 (1995).
18. M. Picco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2998 (1997);
19. Phys. Rev. Lett.C. Chatelain and B. Berche, 80, 1670 (1998);
20. C. ChatelainB. BerchePhys. Rev. E 58, R6899 (1998);
21. Phys. Rev. EC. ChatelainB. Berche60, 3853 (1999);
22. G. Palágyi, C. Chatelain, B. Berche, and F. Iglói, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 357 (2000).
23. J.L. Cardy and J.L. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4063 (1997);
24. J.L. Jacobsen and J.L. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B 515, 701 (1998).
25. T. Olson and A.P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3428 (1999).
26. J.L. Jacobsen and M. Picco, Phys. Rev. E 61, R13 (2000).
27. P.W. Kasteleyn and C.M. Fortuin, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 46(Suppl.), 11 (1969).
28. At the critical point the dominant graph is generally not unique, cf. with the bimodal distribution in Eq. (2.11) any two clusters having just one strong and one weak bond between them could be either connected or disconnected. We assume that the degenerate optimal graphs have the same asymptotic fractal properties.
29. T. Hagerup (unpublished).
30. See, e.g., J.L. Cardy, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by J.L. Lebowitz and M.S. Green (Academic, London, 1987), Vol. 11, p. 1.
31. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 1992).
32. D.S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 534 (1992);
33. D.S. FisherPhys. Rev. B 51, 6411 (1995).
34. F. Iglói and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11 404 (1998).
35. F. Iglói, R. Juhász, and P. Lajkó, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1343 (2001).
36. O. Motrunich, S.-C. Mau, D.A. Huse, and D.S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1160 (2000);
37. Y-C. Lin, N. Kawashima, F. Iglói, and H. Rieger, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 138, 470 (2000).