Impact of environment on people's everyday experiences in Stockholm

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 171, Issue , 2018, Pages 7-17

  Samuelsson, Karl ^a   Giusti, Matteo ^b   Peterson, Garry D ^b   Legeby, Ann ^c   Brandt, S Anders ^a   Barthel, Stephan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÄVLE   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Affordances; Public participatory GIS; Spatial regression; Urban ecosystem services; Urban social ecological systems

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

AFFORDANCES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PARTICIPATORY GIS; PUBLIC PARTICIPATORY GIS; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; SPATIAL REGRESSION; STOCKHOLM; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; URBAN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM;

URBAN PLANNING;

ACCESSIBILITY; AUTOCORRELATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

EID: 85035000677     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abson, D.J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., Lang, D.J., Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46:1 (2017), 30–39, 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
2. Ahern, J., From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:4 (2011), 341–343, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021.
3. Altman, I., Rogoff, B., World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1987, 7–40 https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:4045038.
4. Andersson, E., Bodin, Ö., Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation. Ecography 32:June 2008 (2009), 123–132, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05435.x.
5. Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., Colding, J., Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Gren, Å., Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43:4 (2014), 445–453, 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y.
6. Andersson, E., McPhearson, T., Kremer, P., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Tuvendal, M., Wurster, D., Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosystem Services 12:2003 (2014), 1–8, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001.
7. Barthel, S., Folke, C., Colding, J., Social-ecological memory in urban gardens-Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20 (2010), 255–265, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001.
8. Barthel, S., Koffman, A., Bovin, M., Lundqvist, E., Campbell, E., Tuvendal, M., Kartläggning och analys av ekosystemtjänster i Stockholms stad. 2015, Calluna AB, Stockholm.
9. Bettencourt, L.M.A., The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340:6139 (2013), 1438–1441, 10.1126/science.1235823.
10. Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., Schoon, M.L., (eds.) Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems, 2015, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Bolund, P., Hunhammer, S., Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:29 (1999), 293–301, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
12. Bren d'Amour, C., Reitsma, F., Baiocchi, G., Barthel, S., Güneralp, B., Erb, K.-H., Seto, K.C., Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016, 201606036, 10.1073/pnas.1606036114.
13. Chan, K.M.A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Turner, N., Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113:6 (2016), 1462–1465, 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
14. Chemero, A., An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology 15:2 (2003), 181–195, 10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.
15. Colding, J., Barthel, S., The potential of Urban Green Commons in the resilience building of cities. Ecological Economics 86 (2013), 156–166, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016.
16. Colding, J., Lundberg, J., Folke, C., Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35:5 (2006), 237–244.
17. Coombes, E., Jones, A.P., Hillsdon, M., The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social Science and Medicine 70:6 (2010), 816–822, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.020.
18. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., Brown, C., The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development 19:5 (2009), 289–300, 10.1002/sd.417.
19. Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Bramley, G., The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in Planning 77:3 (2012), 89–141, 10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001.
20. Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., Norberg, J., Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:9 (2003), 488–494, 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2.
21. Frank, L., Kerr, J., Chapman, J., Sallis, J., Urban form relationships with walk trip frequency and distance among youth. American Journal of Health Promotion 21:4 Suppl (2007), 305–311, 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4S.305.
22. Gascon, M., Mas, M.T., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12:4 (2015), 4354–4379, 10.3390/ijerph120404354.
23. Gibson, J., The ecological approach to visual perception. 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
24. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A., Öhrström, E., Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 83:2–3 (2007), 115–126, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.003.
25. Giusti, M., Barthel, S., Marcus, L., Nature routines and affinity with the biosphere: A case study of preschool children in stockholm. Children, Youth and Environments 24:3 (2014), 16–42, 10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.3.0016.
26. Giusti, M., Barthel, S., Samuelsson, K., Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Where is your Stockholm? A Public Participatory GIS study to unfold positive and negative experiences in the landscape of Stockholm. 2017, Swedish National Data Service, 10.5878/002916.
27. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X., Briggs, J.M., Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:5864 (2008), 756–760, 10.1126/science.1150195.
28. Hartig, T., Kahn, P.H.J., Living in cities, naturally. Science 352:6288 (2016), 938–940, 10.1126/science.aaf3759.
29. Hillier, B., Hanson, J., The social logic of space. 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., Xu, J., Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20:1 (1993), 29–66, 10.1068/b200029.
31. Howley, P., Scott, M., Redmond, D., Sustainability versus liveability: An examination of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52:6 (2009), 847–864, 10.1080/09640560903083798.
32. Jabareen, Y.R., Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26:1 (2006), 38–52, 10.1177/0739456X05285119.
33. Jacobs, J., The death and life of great american cities. 1961, Random House, New York, 10.2307/794509.
34. Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., Tyger, T., Let the citizens map—Public participation GIS as a planning support system in the helsinki master plan process. Planning Practice & Research 7459:2 (2015), 1–20, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203.
35. Kennedy, C.A., Stewart, I., Facchini, A., Cersosimo, I., Mele, R., Chen, B., Sahin, A.D., Energy and material flows of megacities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112:19 (2015), 5985–5990, 10.1073/pnas.1504315112.
36. Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., Snabb, K., Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning 113 (2013), 30–46, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008.
37. Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Haybatollahi, M., Schmidt-Thomé, K., Urban happiness: Context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (2016), 34–57, 10.1177/0265813515600121.
38. Legeby, A., Pont, M.B., Marcus, L., Streets for co-presence? Mapping potentials. Karimi, K., Vaughan, L., Sailer, K., Palaiologou, G., Bolton, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th international space syntax symposium, 2015, Space Syntax Laboratory, The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London, London, 1–18.
39. Legeby, A., Configuration and co-presence: The underpinnings of job opportunities. Kim, Y.O., Park, H.T., Seo, K.W., (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th international space syntax symposium, 2013, Sejong University, Seoul.
40. Legeby, A., Patterns of co-presence: Spatial configuration and social segregation. 2013, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:662753/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
41. Lehmann, I., Mathey, J., Rößler, S., Bräuer, A., Goldberg, V., Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for identifying ecosystem services – Application to the analysis of micro-climatic effects. Ecological Indicators 42 (2014), 58–72, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.036.
42. MacKerron, G., Mourato, S., Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change 23:5 (2013), 992–1000, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010.
43. Marcus, L., Colding, J., Toward an integrated theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 2014, 10.5751/ES-06939-190455.
44. Marcus, L., Giusti, M., Barthel, S., Cognitive affordances in sustainable urbanism: Contributions of space syntax and spatial cognition. Journal of Urban Design, 4809(June), 2016, 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565.
45. Marcus, L., Spatial capital: A proposal for an extension of space syntax into a more general urban morphology. The Journal of Space Syntax 1:1 (2010), 30–40 Retrieved from http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/index.php/joss/article/viewFile/12/pdf_5.
46. Mitchell, R., Popham, F., Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. Lancet 372:9650 (2008), 1655–1660, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X.
47. Newman, P., The environmental impact of cities. Environment and Urbanization 18:2 (2006), 275–295, 10.1177/0956247806069599.
48. Passchier-Vermeer, W., Passchier, W.F., Noise exposure and public health. Environmental Health Perspectives 108:6 Suppl (2000), 123–131, 10.2307/3454637.
49. Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 69:4 (2004), 369–384, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035.
50. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2016, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7.
51. Raymond, C.M., Giusti, M., Barthel, S., An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: Toward embodied ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 568:June (2017), 1–9, 10.1016/j.aqpro.2013.07.003.
52. Raymond, C.M., Kyttä, M., Stedman, R., Sense of place, fast and slow: The potential contributions of affordance theory to sense of place. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(September), 2017, 1674, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01674.
53. Soga, M., Gaston, K.J., Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14:2 (2016), 94–101, 10.1002/fee.1225.
54. Soga, M., Yamaura, Y., Koike, S., Gaston, K.J., Land sharing vs. land sparing: Does the compact city reconcile urban development and biodiversity conservation?. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:5 (2014), 1378–1386, 10.1111/1365-2664.12280.
55. Ståhle, A., Compact sprawl: Exploring public open space and contradictions in urban density. 2008, Royal Institute of Technology Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:37326/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
56. Ståhle, A., Place syntax tool (PST). Hull, A., Silva, C., Bertolini, L., (eds.) Accessibility instruments for planning practice, 2012, COST Office, 173–178.
57. Stockholms Parkprogram, Stockholm. 2006 Retrieved from www.stockholm.se/PageFiles/64633/Parkprogr_kap1-5.pdf.
58. Stott, I., Soga, M., Inger, R., Gaston, K.J., Land sparing is crucial for urban ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13:7 (2015), 387–393, 10.1890/140286.
59. Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Gaston, K.J., Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 83 (2007), 308–317, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003.
60. United Nations, World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). 2014, 10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9.
61. van den Berg, A.E., Hartig, T., Staats, H., Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues 63:1 (2007), 79–96, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x.
62. de Vries, S.I., Bakker, I., van Mechelen, W., Determinants of activity-friendly neighborhoods for children: Results from the SPACE study. American Journal of Health Promotion 21:4 Suppl (2007), 312–316, 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.312.
63. Withagen, R., de Poel, H.J., Araújo, D., Pepping, G.-J., Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30:2 (2012), 250–258, 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003.