Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities – An experiment on stockholm

Land Use Policy

Volumn 71, Issue , 2018, Pages 24-35

  Kourtit, Karima ^a,b,c,d   Nijkamp, Peter ^a,c,d,e  

^a Jheronimus Academy of Data Science (JADS)   (Netherlands)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^e TINBERGEN INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Big data; Dashboard; Decision support tools; Digital technology; Intelligent cities; Pentagon model; Performance management; Smart cities; Strategic governance; Urbanmanagement

Indexed keywords

DATA MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MANAGEMENT; SMART CITY; STAKEHOLDER; STOCKHOLM CONVENTION; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EID: 85034993623     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Albert, S., Flournoy, D., LeBrasseur, R., Networked Communities: Strategies for Digital Collaboration. 2009, Information Science Reference, New York : Hershey.
2. Angel, S., Planet of Cities. 2012, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
3. Arribas-Bel, D., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., The sociocultural sources of urban buzz. Environ. Plann. C 34:1 (2016), 188–204.
4. Batty, M., Planning support systems and the new logic of computation. Reg. Dev. Dialogue 16:1 (1995), 1–17.
5. Batty, M., The New Science of Cities. 2013, MIT Press, Cambridge.
6. Brignall, T.J., The unbalanced scorecard: a social and environmental critique. Neely, A., Walters, A., Austin, R., (eds.) Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action. Centre for Business Performance, 2002, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield, UK, 85–92 17–19 July.
7. Capello, R., Nijkamp, P., Pepping, G., Sustainable Cities and Energy Policies. 1999, Springer, Berlin.
8. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P., Smart cities in europe. J. Urban Technol. 18:2 (2011), 65–82.
9. Davis, K., The urbanization of the human. Sci. Am. 213:3 (1965), 40–53.
10. De Waal, A.A., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., The relationship between the level of completeness of a strategic performance management system and perceived advantages and disadvantages. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 29:12 (2009), 1242–1265.
11. De Waal, A., The power of world-Class performance management: use it!. Meas. Bus. Excell. 6:3 (2002), 9–19.
12. De Waal, A., De Toekomst van de Balanced Scorecard: een Interview met prof. dr. Robert S. Kaplan. 2002 http://www.andredewaal.nl/interviews/webarticle-Kaplan-dutch.doc.
13. De Waal, A., The future of the balanced scorecard: an interview with prof. dr. robert S. kaplan. Meas. Bus. Excell. 7:1 (2003), 30–35.
14. De Waal, A., Strategic Performance Management: A Managerial and Behavioural Approach. 2007, Basingstoke Hampshire, Palgrave.
15. Drucker, P., Management Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. 1974, Harper & Row., New York.
16. Friedman, Thomas L., The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Globalized World in the 21st Century. 2005, Allen Lane, London.
17. Glaeser, E., Triumph of the City. 2011, Macmillan, London.
18. Godin, B., The emergence of S&T indicators: why did governments supplement statistics with indicators?. Res. Policy 32 (2003), 679–691.
19. Ho, S.K., Chan, Y.L., Performance measurement and the implementation of balanced scorecards in municipal governments. J. Gov. Financial Manage. 51 (2002), 8–19.
20. Ho, K.S., Mckay, R.B., Innovative performance measurement; balance scorecard-tow perspectives. CPA J. 72:3 (2002), 20–25.
21. Holdren, J.P., Science and technology for sustainable well-being. Science 319:5862 (2008), 424–434.
22. Hollands, R.G., Will the real smart city please stand up?. City 12:3 (2008), 303–320.
23. Hopf, R.H., Litman, D.J., Pratsch, L.W., Ustad, I.M., Welch, R.A., Tychan, T.J., Denett, P.A., Guide to a Balanced Scorecard, Performance Management Methodology. 2008, Department of Energy, USA.
24. Howarth, R., Sustainability, well-being, and economic growth. Minding Nat. 5:2 (2012), 1–18.
25. Vulnerability, Risk and Complexity. Impacts of Global Change on Human Habitats. Kabisch, S., Kunath, A., Schweizer-Ries, P., Steinführer, A., (eds.), 2012, Cambridge, Hogrefe, Göttingen.
26. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70:1 (1992), 71–79.
27. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1996, 75–85.
28. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., The Bbalanced Scorecard – Translating Strategy into Action. 1996, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
29. Kaplan, P.S., Norton, D.P., The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in The New Business Environment. 2001, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
30. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part 1. Acc. Horiz. 15:1 (2001), 87–104.
31. Kitchin, R., Perng, S.-Y., Code and the City. 2016, Routledge, London.
32. Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T.P., McArdle, G., Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci. 2:1 (2015), 6–28.
33. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Invisible cities: the end of the urban century?. Ital. J. Reg. Sci. 14:1 (2015), 05–111.
34. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Franklin, R.S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., A blueprint for strategic urban research: the ‘Urban piazza'. Town Plann. Rev. 85:1 (2014), 97–126.
35. Kourtit, K., Competiveness in Urban Systems – Studies on the ‘Urban Century’. 2014, VU University, Amsterdam.
36. Kourtit, K., The ‘New Urban World’ – Economic-Geographical Studies on the Performance of Urban Systems. 2015, Poznan Adam Mickiewicz University.
37. Kourtit, K., Towards a sustainable i-city: intelligent transition management of digital places. Qual. Innov. Prosper. 20:S1 (2016), 151–164.
38. Kuhlicke, C., Kabisch, S., Krellenberg, K., Steinführer, A., Urban vulnerability under conditions of global environmental change: conceptual reflections and empirical examples from growing and shrinking cities. Kabisch, S., Kunath, A., Schweizer-Ries, P., Steinführer, A., (eds.) Vulnerability, Risk and Complexity. Impacts of Global Change on Human Habitats, 2012, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Cambridge, 27–39.
39. Laurini, R., Geographic Knowledge Infrastructure for Territorial Intelligence and Smart Cities. 2017, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
40. Malecki, E.J., The economic geography of the internet's infrastructure. Econ. Geogr. 78:4 (2002), 399–424.
41. Miller, C.A., New civic epistemologies of quantification: making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 30:3 (2005), 403–432.
42. Mintzberg, H., Structures in Fives – Designing Effective Organisations. 1983, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
43. Neal, Z., The Connected City. 2012, Routledge, New York.
44. Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., (2013), Cities: A Blessing in Disguise, New Urban World Future Challenges: What Model of Development for the Moroccan City? Rabat, Morocco,O ctober 1–2, 2012, Royal Institute for Strategic Studies (IRES), Rabat, 44–52.
45. Nijkamp, P., Kourtit, K., The ‘New urban europe’: global challenges and local responses in the urban century. Eur. Plann. Stud. 21:3 (2013), 291–315.
46. Nijkamp, P., Yim, H.Y., Critical success factors for offshore airports – a comparative evaluation. J. Air Transp. Manage. 7 (2001), 181–188.
47. Nijkamp, P., Vleugel, J., Maggi, R., Masser, I., Missing Transport Networks in Europe. 1994, Aldershot, Avebury.
48. Nijkamp, P., XXQ factors for sustainable urban development: a systemseconomics view. Rom. J. Reg. Sci. 2:1 (2008), 325–342.
49. O'Brien, M., Schütz, H., Bringezu, S., The land footprint of the EU bioeconomy: monitoring tools, gaps and needs. Land Use Policy 47 (2015), 235–246.
50. Ratajczak, W., A systems view of urban sustainability and creativity. Fusco Girard, L., Bayan, T., Nijkamp, P., (eds.) Sustainable City and Creativity, 2011, Aldershot Ashgate, 97–118.
51. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55:1 (2008), 68–78.
52. Sheller, M., Mobile publics: beyond the network perspective. Environ. Plann. D 22 (2004), 39–52.
53. Shetty, S., Reid, N., Global challenges and local responses: creating a new urban world in the shrinking cities of the US industrial midwest. Reg. Sci. Policy Pract. 5 (2013), 201–217.
54. Stiglitz, J.E., Making Globalization Work. 2006, W. W. Norton and Company., New York.
55. Stoms, D.M., Jantz, P.A., Davis, F.W., DeAngelo, G., Strategic targeting of agricultural conservation easements as a growth management tool. Land Use Policy 26:4 (2009), 1149–1161.
56. Stratigea, A., The concept of ‘Smart cities’. towards community development? terrains du numérique. Terrains du Numérique: Etudes de Cas 26:3/4 (2012), 375–388.
57. Stryjakiewicz, T., The process of urban shrinking and its consequences. Rom. J. Reg. Sci. 7 (2013), 29–40.
58. Suzuki, S., Nijkamp, P., Regional Performance Measurement and Improvement. 2017, Springer, Tokyo.
59. Tanasescu, C.R., Oprean, C., Towards a sustainable well-being. Rev. Appl. Socio-Econ. Res. 5:1 (2013), 170–178.
60. Wolfram, M., The role of cities in sustainability transitions: new perspectives for science and policy. Kim, E., Kim, H.S., (eds.) Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea, 2016, Springer, Singapore, 3–22.