How open is open source? - software and beyond

Creativity and Innovation Management

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 248-256

  Balka, Kerstin ^a   Raasch, Christina ^a   Herstatt, Cornelius ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034747964     PISSN: 09631690     EISSN: 14678691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00569.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, R.C., (1983) Collective Invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1-24.
2. Arrow, K., (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions. In Nelson, R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Baldwin, C.Y., Hienerth, C., and Von Hippel, E., (2006) How User Innovations become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study. Research Policy, 35, 1291-313.
4. Balka, K., Raasch, C., and Herstatt, C., (2009) Open Source Enters the World of Atoms: A Statistical Analysis of Open Design. First Monday, 14.
5. Batinic, B., and Bosnjak, M., (2000) Fragebogenuntersuchungen im Internet. In Batinic, B. (ed.), Internet for Psychologists. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp.287-317.
6. Bitzer, J., (2004) Commercial versus Open Source Software: The Role of Product Heterogeneity in Competition. Economic Systems, 28, 369-81.
7. Bonaccorsi, A., and Rossi, C., (2004) Altruistic Individuals, Selfish Firms? The Structure of Motivation in Open Source Software. First Monday, 9.
8. Bonaccorsi, A., Rossi, C., and Giannangeli, S., (2006) Adaptive Entry Strategies under Dominant Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry. Management Science, 52, 1085-98.
9. Dahlander, L., (2005) Appropriation and Appropriability in Open Source Software. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 259-85.
10. Demsetz, H., (1967) Toward a Theory of Property Rights. American Economic Review, 57, 347-59.
11. Franke, N., and Shah, S., (2003) How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing among End-Users. Research Policy, 32, 157-78.
12. Garson, D.G., (2002) Marcel Dekker. Marcel Dekker, New York.
13. Gassmann, O., (2006) Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda. R&D Management, 36, 223-8.
14. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., and Von Hippel, E., (2003) Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing their Innovations. Research Policy, 32, 1753-69.
15. Hecker, F., (1999) Setting Up Shop: The Business of Open-Source Software. IEEE Software, 16, 45-51.
16. Henkel, J., (2006) Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux. Research Policy, 35, 953-69.
17. Hope, J., (2004) Open Source Biotechnology. PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra.
18. Von Krogh, G., and Von Hippel, E., (2003) Open Source Software and the ‘Private-Collective’ Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science. Organization Science, 14, 208-23.
19. Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., Haefliger, S., and Wallin, M., (2008) Open Source Software: What We Know (and Do Not Know) about Motives to Contribute. Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe (DIME) Working Papers on Intellectual Property Rights [WWW document]. URL http://www.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/WP38_vonKroghSpaethHaefligerWallinIPROSS.pdf[accessed 5 October 2009.
20. Von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., Stuermer, M., and Hertel, G., (2009) Results of Maemo and Openmoko Community Survey [WWW document]. URL http://public.smi.ethz.ch/files/MaemoOpenmoko/PublicDescriptiveStatistics.html[accessed 6 October 2009.
21. Lee, G.K., and Cole, R.E., (2003) From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organization Science, 14, 633-49.
22. Lerner, J., and Tirole, J., (2001) The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions. European Economic Review, 45, 819-26.
23. Mahony, I.G., and Naughton, E.J., (2004) Open Source Software Monetized: Out of the Bazaar and into Big Business. Computer and Internet Lawyer, 21, 1-17.
24. R Development Core Team (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer Software Manual][WWW document]. URL http://www.R-project.org[accessed on 6 February 2009.
25. Raasch, C., Herstatt, C., and Balka, K., (2009) On the Open Design of Tangible Goods. R&D Management, 39, 382-93.
26. Roberts, J.A., Hann, I.-H., and Slaughter, S.A., (2006) Understanding the Mmotivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of Apache Projects. Management Science, 52, 984-99.
27. Shah, S.K., (2006) Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development. Management Science, 52, 1000-14.
28. Singhal, J., and Singhal, K., (2002) Supply Chains and Compatibility among Components in Product Design. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 289-302.
29. Stallman, R., (2007) Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software [WWW document]. URL http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html[accessed 5 October 2009.
30. Thomas, G., (2008) Microsoft and Mixed Source Software [WWW document]. URL http://www.mylemonadestand.net/weblog/archives/12[accessed 5 October 2009.
31. Vallance, R., Kiani, S., and Nayfeh, S., (2001) Open Design of Manufacturing Equipment.
32. West, J., (2003) How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259-85.
33. West, J., and O’Mahony, S., (2008) The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities. Industry and Innovation, 15, 145-68.