Psychometric evaluation of the Signs of Depression Scale with a revised scoring mechanism in stroke patients with communicative impairment

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 1653-1663

  van Dijk, Mariska J ^a   de Man van Ginkel, Janneke M ^b   Hafsteinsdóttir, Thóra B ^a,b   Schuurmans, Marieke J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

communication disorder; depression; psychometrics; Screening; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; STROKE;

EID: 85034597150     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215517708328     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hackett ML, Pickles K. Part I: frequency of depression after stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Stroke 2014; 9: 1017–1025.
2. Robinson RG, Jorge RE. Post-stroke depression: a review. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 173: 221–231.
3. Kouwenhoven SE, Kirkevold M, Engedal K. Depression in acute stroke: prevalence, dominant symptoms and associated factors. A systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 539–556.
4. Boddice G, Brauer S, Gustafsson L. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: National Stroke Foundation, 2010.
5. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010; 41: 2402–2448.
6. Salter K, Bhogal SK, Foley N. The assessment of poststroke depression. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007; 14: 1–24.
7. Van Dijk MJ, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdottir TB. Identifying depression post-stroke in patients with aphasia: a systematic review of the reliability, validity and feasibility of available instruments. Clin Rehabil 2016; 30: 795–810.
8. Benaim C, Cailly B, Perennou D. Validation of the aphasic depression rating scale. Stroke 2004; 35: 1692–1696.
9. Guy W. The clinical global impression scale. In: Guy W, (ed.) ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology-revised. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education & Welfare, ADAMHA, NIMH Psycho-pharmacology Research Branch, 1976, pp. 218–222.
10. Hammond MF, O’Keeffe ST, Barer DH. Development and validation of a brief observer-rated screening scale for depression in elderly medical patients. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 511–515.
11. Sutcliffe L, Lincoln N. The assessment of depression in aphasic stroke patients: the development of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 506–513.
12. Burton L, Tyson S. Screening for mood disorders after stroke: a systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility. Psychol Med 2015; 45: 29–49.
13. Van Dijk MJ, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the Signs of Depression Scale. Clin Nurs Res. Epub ahead of print 5 July 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1054773816657798.
14. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Scaling responses. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, (eds) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 37–75.
15. Meyer GJ, Finn SE, Eyde LD. Psychological testing and psychological assessment: a review of evidence and issues. Am Psychol 2001; 56: 128–165.
16. Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiat 1988; 45: 1069–1077.
17. Mahoney FI. The Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.
18. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603–612.
19. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22.
20. Watkins C, Leathley M, Daniels L. The signs of depression scale in stroke: how useful are nurses observations. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 447–457.
21. Bennett H, Thomas S, Austen R. Validation of screening measures for assessing mood in stroke patients. Br J Clin Psychol 2006; 45: 367–376.
22. Lightbody CE, Auton M, Baldwin R. The use of nurses’ and carers’ observations in the identification of poststroke depression. J Adv Nurs 2007; 60: 595–604.
23. Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48: 175–186.
24. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann 2002; 32: 509–515.
25. Williams LS, Brizendine EJ, Plue L. Performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 635–638.
26. De Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdottir T, Lindeman E. An efficient way to detect poststroke depression by subsequent administration of a 9-item and a 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Stroke 2012; 43: 854–856.
27. De Man-van Ginkel JM, Gooskens F, Schepers VP. Screening for poststroke depression using the patient health questionnaire. Nurs Res 2012; 61: 333–341.
28. Enderby PM, Wood VA, Wade DT. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1986; 8: 166–170.
29. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.
30. Robinson BC. Validation of a caregiver strain index. J Gerontol 1983; 38: 344–348.
31. Williams LS, Bakas T, Brizendine E. How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients’ health-related quality of life? Stroke 2006; 37: 2081–2085.
32. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155–159.
33. Field A. Correlation. In: Field A, (ed.) Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 2009, pp.166–196.
34. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.
35. De Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdottir TB, Lindeman E. In-hospital risk prediction for post-stroke depression: development and validation of the Post-stroke Depression Prediction Scale. Stroke 2013; 44: 2441–2445.
36. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2004.
37. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 659–670.
38. De Man-van Ginkel JM, Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Lindeman E. Clinical manifestation of depression after stroke: is it different from depression in other patient populations? PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0144450.
39. Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, De Haan R. Assessing quality of life after stroke: the value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997; 28: 1541–1549.
40. Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM. Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 42–48.
41. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH. Agreement between patient and proxy assessments of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Stroke 2004; 35: 607–612.