Agentsthat Learnto Instruct

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-97-01, Issue , 1997, Pages 1-8

  Angros, Richard ^a   Johnson, W Lewis ^b   Rickel, Jeff ^b  

^a RAYTHEON COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

CAUSAL DEPENDENCIES; CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; LEARN+; PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE; SIMULATED ENVIRONMENT;

DEMONSTRATIONS;

EID: 85034503553     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Benson, S. 1995. Inductive learning of reactive action models. In MachineLearning: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference, 47-54. San Francisco, Calif.; Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Cypher, A. et al., eds. 1993. WatchWhatlDo: Programmingby Demonstration. Cambridge, Mass.: The MITPress.
3. Chi, M. T. H.; Bassok, M.; Lewis, M. W.; Reimann, P.; and Glaser, R. 1989. Self-explanations: Howstudents study and use examplesto solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13:145-182.
4. Gil, Y. 1992. Acquiring DomainKnowledge for Planning by Experimentation. Ph.D. diss., School of Computer Science, Carnegie MellonUniv.
5. Huffman, S. B.; and Laird, J. E. 1995. Flexibly instructable agents. Journal of Artificial lntelligence Research, 3:271-324.
6. Johnson, W.L. 1995. Pedagogical agents in virtual learning environments.In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, 41-48; AACE.
7. Johnson, W.L.; Rickel, J.; Stiles, R.; and Munro, A. 1997. Integrating pedagogicalagents into virtual environments. Presence, forthcoming.
8. Krishnamurthy, B. ed. 1995. Practical Reusable UNIX Software. NewYork, NY.; John Wiley & Sons. http://portal.research.bell-labs.com/orgs/ssr/book/reuse
9. Laird, J. E.; Newell, A.; and Rosenbloom, P. S. 1987.Soar: Anarchitecture for generalintelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1): 1-64.
10. McAllester, D.; and Rosenblitt, D. 1991. Systematic Nonlinear Planning. In Proceedings of the Ninth National Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-91), 634-639. MenloPark, Calif.; AAAI Press.
11. Mitchell, T. M. 1978. Version Spaces: AnApproachto ConceptLearning. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of ComputerScience, Stanford Univ.
12. Munro, A.; Johnson, M. C.; Surmon, D. S.; and Wogulis, J.L. 1993. Attribute-centered simulation authoring for instruction. In Proceedings of the AI-ED93 World Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 82-89. Edinburgh, Scotland.
13. Ousterhout, J. K. 1994.Tcl andthe TkToolkit. Reading, Mass.; Addison-Wesley.
14. Pearson, D. J. 1995. Active learning in correcting domain theories: Help or hindrance. In AAAISymposiumon Active Learning.
15. Porter, B. W.; and Kubler, D.F. 1986. Experimentalgoal regression: Amethod for learning problem-solving heuristics. MachineLearning, 1:249-286.
16. Redmond, M.A. 1992. Learning by observing and understanding expert problemsolving. Ph.D. diss., Georgia Institute of Technology.
17. Rickel, J.; and Johnson, W. L. 1997a. Integrating pedagogicalcapabilities in a virtual environmentagent. In Proceedings of the First International Conferenceon AutonomousAgents.; ACMPress.
18. Rickel, J.; andJohnson, W.L. 1997b.Intelligent tutoring in virtual reality: a preliminaryreport. In Proceedings of the Eighth WorldConferenceon AIin Education.; IOS Press.
19. Shen, W. 1994. AutonomousLearning FromThe Environment. NewYork, NY: W.H. Freeman.
20. Tecuci, G.; and Hieb, M. R. 1996. Teaching intelligent agents: Thedisciple approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 8(3):259-285.
21. Wang, X. 1996. Learning Planning Operators by Observation and Practice. Ph.D. diss., School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ.
22. Wilkins, D. C. 1990. Knowledgebase refinement as improvingan incorrect and incomplete domaintheory. In MachineLearningAn Artificial Intelligence Approach, volume111, 493-513. San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann.