Visibility analysis and landscape evaluation in Martin river cultural park (Aragon, Spain) integrating biophysical and visual units

Journal of Maps

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 415-424

  Franch Pardo, Iván ^a,b   Cancer Pomar, Luis ^b   Napoletano, Brian M ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE MATEMÁTICAS   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biophysical landscape; Complex physical geography; European Landscape Convention; Landscape evaluation; Visual landscape

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034239607     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17445647     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2017.1319881     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Blanco, A., Gonzales, S., & Ramos, A. (1982). Visual landscape classification in the coastal strip of Santander (Spain). Coastal Zone Management Journal, 9(3–4), 271–297. doi:10.1080/08920758209361904
2. BLI. (n.d.). River Martín Canyons and Arcos mountain range. En Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs). Bird Life International. Retrieved from http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/sitefactsheet.php?id=1805
3. Bocco-Verdinelli, G., Priego-Santander, A. G., & Cotler, H. (2010). The contribution of physical geography to environmental public policy development in Mexico. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 31(2), 215–223.
4. Boersema, J. (2009). Environmental sciences, sustainability and quality. In J. J. Boersema & L. Reijnders (Eds.), Principles of environmental sciences (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: Springer. Campos
5. Sánchez, M., & Priego-Santander, A. G. (2011). Biophysical landscapes of a coastal area of Michoacán state in Mexico. Journal of Maps, 7(1), 42–50. doi:10.4113/jom.2011.1098
6. Council of Europe. (2000). European landscape convention. Florence, European Treaty Series, 176, 20.
7. Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1), 267–281. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
8. Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363–384. doi:10.1080/01426390601004343
9. Farina, A. (2009). Ecology, cognition and landscape: Linking natural and social systems. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3138-9
10. Fernández Martín, M. T., García Ezpeleta, F., Gil Azuara, R., Gordillo Azuara, J. C., Porcel I Caro, E., & Royo Lasarte, J. (2012). Guía de cavidades y arte rupestre del Parque Cultural del río Martín [Guide to cavities and cave art of the Martin river cultural park]. Centro de Estudios Espeleológicos Turolenses. Zaragoza: Prames.
11. Fisher, P. F. (1995). An exploration of probable viewsheds in landscape planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22(5), 527–546. doi:10.1068/b220527
12. Franch-Pardo, I., Espinoza-Maya, A., Cancer-Pomar, L., & Bollo-Manent, M. (2016). Mapa de paisajes físicogeográficos en el Parque Cultural del río Martín (Teruel, Aragón) escala 1: 50.000 [Map of physical-geographic landscapes in the Martin river cultural park (Teruel, Aragon) 1: 50.000 scale]. Revista Catalana de Geografía, 20(53). Retrieved from http://www.rcg.cat/articles.php?id=351
13. Franch-Pardo, I., Priego-Santander, A., Bollo-Manent, M., Cancer-Pomar, L., & Bautista, F. (2015). Aplicación de los paisajes físico-geográficos en un sector de la cordillera ibérica: la cuenca del río Martín (Aragón, España) [Application of the physico-geographic landscapes in a sector of the Iberian mountain range: The Martin river basin (Aragon, Spain)]. Interciencia, 40(6), 381–389.
14. Fry, G. L., Tveit, M. S., Ode, A., & Velarde, M. D. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5), 933–947. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.008
15. Gómez Zotano, J., & Riesco Chueca, P. (2010). Marco conceptual y metodológico para los paisajes españoles: Aplicación a tres escalas espaciales [Conceptual and methodological framework for Spanish landscapes: Application to three spatial scales]. Seville: Consejería de Obras Públicas y Vivienda, Centro de Estudios Paisaje y Territorio. p. 467.
16. Government of Aragon. (2007–2013). Mapa de Paisaje de Aragón [Landscape maps of Aragon]. Zaragoza: Strategies Territorial Service, Directorate General of Planning. Retrieved from http://idearagon.aragon.es/paisaje.jsp
17. IDEARAGON. (n.d.). Government of Aragon. Retrieved from http://idearagon.aragon.es
18. Jones, M., & Stenseke, M. (2011). The issue of public participation in the European landscape convention. In M. Jones &M. Stenseke (Eds.), The European landscape convention: Challenges of participation (pp. 1–26). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
19. La Rosa, D. (2011). The observed landscape: Map of visible landscape values in the province of Enna (Italy). Journal of Maps, 7(1), 291–303. doi:10.4113/jom.2011.1183
20. Laurie, I. C. (1975). Aesthetic factors in visual evaluation. In E. N. Zube, R.O. Brush, & J. G. Fabos (Eds.), Landscape assessment: Values, perceptions and resources (pp. 102-117). Stroudsburg: Dowden Hutchinson and Ross.
21. Linton, D. L. (1968). The assessment of scenery as a natural resource. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84(3), 219–238. doi:10.1080/00369226808736099
22. Martín Ramos, B., & Otero Pastor, I. (2012). Mapping the visual landscape quality in Europe using physical attributes. Journal of Maps, 8(1), 56–61. doi:10.1080/17445647.2012.668763
23. Naveh, Z., & Lieberman, A. S. (2013). Landscape ecology: Theory and application. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
24. Otero, I., Casermeiro, M. A., Ezquerra, A., & Esparcia, P. (2007). Landscape evaluation: Comparison of evaluation methods in a region of Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(1), 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.018
25. Panagopoulos, T. (2009). Linking forestry, sustainability and aesthetics. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2485–2489. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.006
26. Priego-Santander, A. G., Bocco-Verdinelli, G., Mendoza-Cantú, M., & Garrido-Pérez, A. (2010). Propuesta para la generación semiautomatizada de paisajes. Fundamentos y métodos [Proposal for the semiautomated generation of landscapes. Fundamentals and methods]. México: Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, UNAM.
27. Richling, A. (1983). Subject of study in complex physical geography (landscape geography). GeoJournal, 7(2), 185–187. doi:10.1007/BF00185166
28. Riggs, P. D., & Dean, D. J. (2007). An investigation into the causes of errors and inconsistencies in predicted viewsheds. Transactions in GIS, 11(2), 175–196. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01040.x
29. Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2007). Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4), 362–374. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.004
30. Stephenson, J. (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(2), 127–139. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
31. Tress, B., Tress, G., Decamps, H., & d’Hauteserre, A. M. (2001). Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape and Urban Panning, 57, 137–141. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00199-2
32. Tveit, M., Ode, Å, & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229–255. doi:10.1080/01426390600783269
33. Wheatley, D. (1995). Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GISbased method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application. In G. Lock & Z. Stancic (Eds.), Archaeology and geographical information systems (pp. 171–186). London: Taylor and Francis.
34. Yeomans, W. C. (1979). A proposed biophysical approach to visual absorption capability (VAC). National Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, Incline Village, Nevada, April 23–25.