What do we really know about the space-time continuum of soil-landscapes?

Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling: Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 3-36

  Grunwald, Sabine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; LAND USE; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; WATER RESOURCES;

20TH CENTURY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; SOIL-LANDSCAPE MODELS; SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM;

SOILS;

EID: 85034217466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (113)

1. DH Yaloon. Down to earth. Nature 407: 301, 2000.
2. J Passmore. Man's Responsibility for Nature. Duckworth Publ., London, 1980.
3. th ed. Methuen, London, 1949.
4. RC Solomon, KM Higgins. A Short History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
5. WKC Guthrie. Greek Philosophy. Methuen, London, 1950.
6. DH Yaalon, RW Arnold. Attitudes towards soils and their societal relevance: then and now. Soil Sci 165: 5-12, 2000.
7. NJ McKenzie, MP Austin. A quantitative Australian approach to medium and small scale surveys based on soil stratigraphy and environmental correlation. Geoderma 57: 329-355, 1993.
8. SSSA (Soil Science Society of America). Glossary of Soil Science Terms. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1997. Available at http://www.soils.org.
9. SW Buol, FD Hole, RJ McCracken, RJ Southard. Soil Genesis and Classification. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1997.
10. A Young. Land Resources: Now and for the Future. Cambridge University Press, London, 1998. Available at http://www.land-resources.com.
11. RV Ruhe. Quarternary Landscapes in Iowa. Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1969.
12. JC Dijkerman. Pedology as a science: the role of data, models and theories in the study of natural soil systems. Geoderma 11: 73-93, 1974.
13. DJ Mulla, AB McBratney. Soil spatial variability. In Handbook of Soil Science, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 2000.
14. S Grunwald, P Barak, K McSweeney, B Lowery. Soil-landscape models at dif ferent scales portrayed in Virtual Reality Modeling Language. Soil Science, 165: 598-614, 2000.
15. DA Wysocki, PJ Schoeneberger, HE LaGarry. Geomorphology of soil-landscapes. In Handbook of Soil Science, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 2000, pp. E5-E72.
16. M Voltz, R Webster. A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil attributes from sample information. J Soil Sci 31: 505-524, 1990.
17. R Webster, MA Oliver. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
18. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 8th ed. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1998.
19. D Peuquet. Presentations of geographic space: towards a conceptual synthesis. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 78: 375-394, 1988.
20. M Goodchild, G Sun, S Yang. Development and test of an error model for categorical data. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 6: 87-104, 1992.
21. PA Burrough, RA McDonnell. Principles of Geographical Information Systems: Spatial Information Systems and Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
22. AB McBratney, JJ de Gruijter. A continuum approach to soil classification by modified fuzzy k-means with extragrades. J Soil Sci 43: 159-175, 1992.
23. GBM Heuvelink, R Webster. Modeling soil variation: past, present, and future. Geoderma 100: 269-301, 2001.
24. PA Burrough, PFM van Gaans, R Hootsmans. Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 77: 115-135, 1997.
25. R Webster, HE De La Cuanalo. Soil transect correlograms of North Oxfordshire and their interpretation. J Soil Sci 26: 176-194, 1975.
26. S Nortcliff. Soil variability and reconnaissance soil mapping: a statistical study in Norfolk. J Soil Sci 29: 403-418, 1978.
27. DJ Campbell, DG Kinninburgh, PHT Beckett. The soil solution chemistry of some Oxfordshire soils: temporal and spatial variability. J Soil Sci 40: 321-339, 1989.
28. WD Nettleton, BR Brasher, G Borst. The tax adjunct problem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55: 421-427, 1991.
29. BE Butler. Soil Classification for Soil Survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980.
30. Soil Survey Staff. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. In USDA-SCS Agric. Handbook, Vol. 436. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1999.
31. P Goovaerts. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 1997.
32. JP Chilès, P Delfiner P Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. Wiley-Inter science Publ., New York, 1999.
33. GBM Heuvelink, JA Huisman. Choosing between abrupt and gradual spatial variation? In Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty in Natural Resources: Theory and Applications for GIS and Remote Sensing, HT Mowrer, RG Congalton, Eds. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, 2000, pp. 111-118.
34. T Hengl. Pedometric Mapping: Bridging the Gap between Conventional and Pedometric Approaches. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Netherlands, 2003.
35. A Stein, M Hoogerwerf, J Bouma. Use of soil-map delineations to improve (co)-kriging of point data on moisture deficits. Geoderma 43: 163-177, 1988.
36. BGM Heuvelink, MFP Bierkens. Combining soil maps with interpolations from point observations to predict quantitative soil attributes. Geoderma 55: 1-15, 1992.
37. AS Rogowski, JK Wolf. Incorporating variability into soil map unit delineations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 403-418, 1994.
38. P Goovaerts, AG Journel. Integrating soil map information in modeling the spatial variation in continuous soil attributes. Eur J Soil Sci 46: 397-414, 1995.
39. GBM Heuvelink. Identification of field attribute error under different models of spatial variation. Int J GIS 10: 921-935, 1996.
40. NC Brady, RR Weil. The Nature and Attributes of Soils, 13th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
41. LJ Osher, SW Buol. Relationship of soil attributes to parent material and landscape position in eastern Madre de Dios, Peru. Geoderma 83: 143-166, 1998.
42. EN Bui. Soil survey as a knowledge system. Geoderma 120: 17-26, 2004.
43. A Su, SC Hu, R Furuta. 3D Topographic Maps for Texas, 1996. Available at http://www. csdl.tamu.edu/~su/topomaps/.
44. M Hogan, K Laurent. Virtual Earth Science at USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), 1999. Available at http://virtual.er.usgs.gov/.
45. K McSweeney, PE Gessler, BK Slater, RD Hammer, GW Peterson, JC Bell. Towards a new framework for modeling the soil-landscape continuum. In Factors in Soil Formation, SSSA Special Publication 33. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1994.
46. ML Mendonça Santos, C Guenat, M Bouzelboudjen, F Golay. Three-dimensional GIS cartography applied to the study of the spatial variation of soil horizons in a Swiss floodplain. Geoderma 97: 351-366, 2000.
47. NM Sirakov, FH Muge. A system for reconstructing and visualizing three-dimen sional objects. Comput Geosci 27: 59-69, 2001.
48. S Grunwald, P Barak. The use of VRML for virtual soil-landscape modeling. Syst Anal Model Simulation 41: 755-776, 2001.
49. H Eswaran, T Rice, R Ahrens, BA Stewart. Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference. CRC Press, New York, 2003.
50. USDA-NRCS (United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Con servation Service). 2003 Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 9th ed. USDA-NRCS, Washington D.C., 2003.
51. R Dudal. How good is our soil classification? In Soil Classification: A Global Desk Reference, H Eswaran, T Rice, R Ahrens, BA Stewart, Eds. CRC Press, New York, 2003, pp. 11-18.
52. PA Burrough. The technologic paradox in soil survey: new methods and techniques of data capture and handling. Enschede ITC J 3: 15-22, 1993.
53. TJ Gish, WP Dulaney, KJ Kung, CST Daughtry, JA Doolittle, PT Miller. Evalu ating use of ground-penetrating radar for identifying subsurface flow pathways. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 1620-1629, 2002.
54. JA Doolittle, ME Collins. A comparison of EM induction and GPR methods in areas of karst. Geoderma 85: 83-102, 1998.
55. DJ Inman, RS Freeland, JT Ammons, RE Yoder. Soil investigations using elec-tronmagnetic induction and ground-penetrating radar in southeast Tennessee. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66: 206-211, 2002.
56. B Lowery, RT Schuler. Duration and effects of compaction on soil and plant growth in Wisconsin. Soil Tillage Res 29: 205-210, 1994.
57. S Grunwald, DJ Rooney, K McSweeney, B Lowery. Development of pedotransfer functions for a profile cone penetrometer. Geoderma 100: 25-47, 2001.
58. JR Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective. Pearson Education, New York, 2000.
59. HW Siesler, Y Ozaki, S Kawata, HM Heise. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
60. LP Wilding, J Bouma, DW Goss. Impact of spatial variability on interpretive modeling. In Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes, SSSA Special Publication 39, RB Bryant, RW Arnold, Eds. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1994.
61. JP Wilson, JC Gallant, Eds. Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000.
62. ID Moore, RB Grayson, AR Ladson. Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydro logical, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5: 3-30, 1991.
63. RJ Huggett. Soil landscape systems: a model of soil genesis. Geoderma 13: 1-22, 1975.
64. AJ Conacher, JB Dalrymple. The nine-unit land surface model: an approach to pedogeomorphic research. Geoderma 18: 1-154, 1977.
65. DJ Pennock, BJ Zebarth, E de Jong. Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 40: 297-315, 1987.
66. BL Turner, WB Meyer. Global land use and land cover change: an overview. In Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective, WB Meyer, BL Turner II, Eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994, pp. 3-10.
67. MR Hoosbeek, RB Bryant. Towards the quantitative modeling of pedogenesis: a review. Geoderma 55: 183-210, 1992.
68. AB McBratney, ML Mendonça Santos, B Minasny. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117: 3-52, 2003.
69. DJ Brus, JJ de Gruijter. Random sampling or geostatistical modeling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil. Geoderma 80: 1-44, 1997.
70. JW van Groeningen, W Siderius, A Stein. Constrained optimization of soil sam pling for minimization of the kriging variance. Geoderma 87: 239-259, 1999.
71. AR Mermut, H Eswaran. Some major development in soil science since the mid-1960s. Geoderma 100: 403-426, 2001.
72. KD Glinka. The Great Soil Groups of the World and Their Development. Edwards Bros., Ann Arbor, MI, 1927 (translated from German by C.F. Marbut).
73. H Jenny. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941.
74. H Jenny. EW Hillgard and the Birth of Modern Soil Science. Farallo Publ., Berkeley, CA, 1961.
75. BD Hudson. The soil survey as paradigm-based science. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 836-841, 1992.
76. H Jenny. Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology. Dover Publ., New York, 1992.
77. DJ Pennock, DW Anderson, E de Jong. Landscape-scale changes in indicators of soil quality due to cultivation in Saskatchewan, Canada. Geoderma 64: 1-19, 1994.
78. AB Hairston, DF Grigal. Topographic variation in soil water and nitrogen for two forested landforms in Minnesota, USA. Geoderma 64: 125-138, 1994.
79. CS Holzhey, RB Daniels, EE Gamble. Thick Bh horizons in the North Carolina coastal plain. II. Physical and chemical attributes and rates of organic additions from surface sources. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39: 1182-1187, 1975.
80. RB Morrison, JC Frye. Correlation of the Middle and Late Quarternary Succes sions of the Lake Lahontan, Lake Bonneville, Rocky Mountain, Southern Grean Plains, and Eastern Midwest Areas, Nevada Bureau of Mines Report 9. Nevada Bureau of Mines, 1965, 45 p.
81. G Milne. Normal erosion as a factor in soil profile development. Nature 138: 541-548, 1936.
82. TM Bushnell. Some aspects of the soil catena concept. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 7: 466-476, 1942.
83. M Sommer, E Schlichting. Archetypes of catenas in respect to matter: a concept for structuring and grouping catenas. Geoderma 76: 1-33, 1997.
84. SJ Park, K McSweeney, B Lowery. Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma 103: 249-272, 2001.
85. RA Fisher. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1925.
86. JHM Wösten, PA Finke, MJW Jansen. Comparison of class and continuous pedo-transfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66: 227-237, 1995.
87. AB McBratney, B Minasny, SR Cattle, RW Vervoort. From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems. Geoderma 109: 41-73, 2002.
88. JHM Wösten, CHJE Schuren, J Bouma, A Stein. Functional sensitivity analysis of four methods to generate soil hydraulic functions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54: 832-836, 1990.
89. WJ Rawls, DL Brakensiek, KE Saxton. Estimation of soil water properties. Trans ASAE 1316-1320, 1982.
90. R Webster. The development of pedometrics. Geoderma 62: 1-15, 1994.
91. LA Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338-353, 1965.
92. AB McBratney, IOA Odeh, TFA Bishop, MS Dunbar, TM Shatar. An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97: 293-327, 2000.
93. AB McBratney, IOA Odeh. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77: 85-113, 1997.
94. E Isaaks, RM Srivastava. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford Uni versity Press, New York, 1989.
95. G Matheron. Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation. Une application de la théorie de functions aléatoires aux scienes de la nature. Masson, Paris, 1965.
96. P Goovaerts. Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geo derma 89: 1-45, 1999.
97. V Ramasundaram, S Grunwald, A Mangeot, NB Comerford, CM Bliss. Develop ment of an environmental virtual field laboratory. J Comput Educ 45: 21-34.
98. IOA Odeh, AB McBratney, DJ Chittleborough. Spatial prediction of soil attributes from landform derived from a digital elevation model. Geoderma 63: 197-214, 1994.
99. H Wackernagel. Multivariate Geostatistics. Springer, Berlin, 2003.
100. M Knotters, DJ Brus, JH Oude Voshaar. A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations. Geoderma 67: 227-246, 1995.
101. F Carré, MC Girard. Quantitative mapping of soil types based on regression kriging of taxonomic distances with landform and land cover attributes. Geoderma 110: 241-263, 2002.
102. IOA Odeh, AB McBratney, DJ Chittleborough. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-krig-ing. Geoderma 67: 215-226, 1995.
103. RW Simonson. Outline of a generalized theory of soil genesis. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23: 152-156, 1959.
104. GH Brimhall, WE Dietrich. Constitutive mass balance relations between chemical composition, volume, density, porosity, and strain in metsomatic hydrochemical systems: results on weathering and pedogenesis. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 5: 567-587, 1987.
105. OA Chadwick, RC Graham. Pedogenic processes. In Handbook of Soil Science, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 1999, pp. E41-E72.
106. MR Hoosbeek, RG Amundson, RB Bryant. Pedological modeling. In Handbook of Soil Science, ME Sumner, Ed. CRC Press, New York, 2000, pp. E-77-E-111.
107. AG Journel. Geostatistics, models and tools for the earth sciences. Math Geol 18: 119-140, 1986.
108. AL Steinwand, TE Fenton. Landscape evolution and shallow groundwater hydrol ogy of a till landscape in central Iowa. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59: 1370-1377, 1996.
109. ME Sumner, Ed. Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, New York, 2000.
110. MR Hoosbeek, RB Bryant. Developing and adapting soil process submodels for use in the pedodynamic orthod model. In Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes, SSSA Special Publication 39, RB Bryant, RW Arnold, Eds. SSSA, Madison, WI, 1994.
111. B Minasny, AB McBratney. A rudimentary mechanistic model for soil production and landscape development. Geoderma 90: 3-21, 1999.
112. RE Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Basic Eng 82D: 35-45, 1960.
113. JD Phillips. Contingency and generalization in pedology as exemplified by texture-contrast soils. Geoderma 102: 347-370, 2001.