Spatial complexities in aboveground carbon stocks of a semi-arid mangrove community: A remote sensing height-biomass-carbon approach

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Volumn 200, Issue , 2018, Pages 194-201

  Hickey, S M ^a   Callow, N J ^a   Phinn, S ^b   Lovelock, C E ^b   Duarte, C M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BIOMASS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COASTAL ZONE; COMPLEXITY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; LANDSAT; LIDAR; MANGROVE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SEMIARID REGION;

AUSTRALIA;

RHIZOPHORACEAE;

EID: 85034052004     PISSN: 02727714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alongi, D.M., Tirendi, F., Clough, B.F., Below-ground decomposition of organic matter in forests of the mangroves Rhizophora stylosa and Avicennia marina along the arid coast of Western Australia. Aquat. Bot. 68 (2000), 97–122 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(00)00110-8.
2. Atwood, T.B., et al. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Change 7:7 (2017), 523–528, 10.1038/nclimate3326.
3. Barbier, E.B., Hacker, S.D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E.W., Stier, A.C., Silliman, B.R., The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81:2 (2011), 169–193 https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1.
4. BOM, Bureau of Meteorology. Climate Data Online: Learmonth Station Number 005007. 2017 Available http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/. (Accessed 1 July 2017)
5. Bulmer, R.H., Schwendenmann, L., Lundquist, C.J., Allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass, carbon and nitrogen stocks in temperate Avicennia marina forests. Wetlands 36 (2016), 841–848 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0793-0.
6. Calders, K., Newnham, G., Burt, A., Murphy, S., Raumonen, P., Herold, M., et al. Nondestructive estimates of above-ground biomass using terrestrial laser scanning. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6:2 (2015), 198–208 https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12301.
7. Cassata, L., Collins, L.B., Coral reef communities, habitats, and substrates in and near sanctuary zones of Ningaloo marine Park. J. Coast. Res., 2008, 139–151 https://doi.org/10.2112/05-0623.1.
8. Chander, G., Markham, B.L., Helder, D.L., Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (2009), 893–903.
9. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M.A., Chambers, J.Q., Eamus, D., et al. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:1 (2005), 87–99 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0100-x.
10. Cornforth, W.A., Fatoyinbo, T.E., Freemantle, T.P., Pettorelli, N., Advanced land observing satellite phased array type L-Band SAR (ALOS PALSAR) to inform the conservation of mangroves: sundarbans as a case study. Remote Sens. 5:1 (2013), 224–237 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5010224.
11. Costa, P., et al. Are there general spatial patterns of mangrove structure and composition along estuarine salinity gradients in Todos os Santos Bay?. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 166 (2015), 83–91, 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.08.014.
12. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26 (2014), 152–158 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
13. Day, J.W., Conner, W.H., Ley-Lou, F., Day, R.H., Navarro, A.M., The productivity and composition of mangrove forests, Laguna de T??rminos, Mexico. Aquat. Bot. 27:3 (1987), 267–284 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(87)90046-5.
14. Donato, D.C., Kauffman, J.B., Murdiyarso, D., Kurnianto, S., Stidham, M., Kanninen, M., Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. April 3 Nat. Geosci. 4:5 (2011), 293–297 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1123.
15. Ellison, J.C., Mangrove Retreat with Rising Sea-level. 1993 Bermuda. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1993.1042.
16. Eslami-Andargoli, L., Dale, P.E.R., Sipe, N., Chaseling, J., Local and landscape effects on spatial patterns of mangrove forest during wetter and drier periods: moreton Bay, Southeast Queensland, Australia. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 89:1 (2010), 53–61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.011.
17. Fatoyinbo, T.E., Armstrong, A.H., Remote characterization of biomass measurements: case study of mangrove forests. September Biomass, 2010, 65–78 Retrieved from http://www.intechopen.com/books/biomass/remote-characterization-of-biomass-measurements-case-study-of-mangrove-forests.
18. Fatoyinbo, T.E., Simard, M., International Journal of Remote Height and Biomass of Mangroves in Africa from ICESat/GLAS and SRTM. 34, 2013, 668–681 (2) https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.712224.
19. Fatoyinbo, T.E., Simard, M., Washington-Allen, R.A., Shugart, H.H., Landscape-scale extent, height, biomass, and carbon estimation of Mozambique's mangrove, forests with Landsat ETM+ and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission elevation data. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 113:2 (2008), 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000551.
20. Getis, A., Ord, J.K., The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24:3 (1992), 189–206 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
21. Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L.L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., et al. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20:1 (2011), 154–159 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x.
22. Giri, C., Pengra, B., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Tieszen, L.L., Monitoring mangrove forest dynamics of the Sundarbans in Bangladesh and India using multi-temporal satellite data from 1973 to 2000. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 73:1–2 (2007), 91–100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.12.019.
23. Hamilton, S.E., Casey, D., Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25:6 (2016), 729–738 https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12449.
24. Harris, N.L., Goldman, E., Gabris, C., Nordling, J., Minnemeyer, S., Ansari, S., et al. Using spatial statistics to identify emerging hot spots of forest loss. Environ. Res. Lett., 12(2), 2017, 24012 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5a2f.
25. Howard, J., Hoyt, S., Isensee, K., Pidgeon, E., Telszewski, M., Coastal blue carbon. Conserv. Int., 36(1), 2014, 180.
26. Hutchison, J., Manica, A., Swetnam, R., Balmford, A., Spalding, M., Predicting global patterns in mangrove forest biomass. Conserv. Lett. 7:3 (2014), 233–240 https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12060.
27. Jensen, J.R., Lin, H., Yang, X., Ramsey, E., Davis, B.A., Thoemke, C.W., The measurement of mangrove characteristics in southwest Florida using spot multispectral data. Geocarto Int. 6:2 (1991), 13–21 https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049109354302.
28. Kauffman, J.B., Donato, D.C., Protocols for the Measurement, Monitoring and Reporting of Structure, Biomass and Carbon Stocks in Mangrove Forests. 2012 Working Paper 86. Bogor, Indonesia.
29. Koch, E.W., Barbier, E.B., Silliman, B.R., Reed, D.J., Perillo, G.M.E., Hacker, S.D., et al. Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7:1 (2009), 29–37 https://doi.org/10.1890/080126.
30. Komiyama, A., Ong, J.E., Poungparn, S., Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat. Bot. 89:2 (2008), 128–137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006.
31. Krauss, K.W., From, A.S., Doyle, T.W., Doyle, T.J., Barry, M.J., Sea-level rise and landscape change influence mangrove encroachment onto marsh in the Ten Thousand Islands region of Florida, USA. J. Coast. Conservation 15:4 (2011), 629–638 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-011-0153-4.
32. Lagomasino, D., Fatoyinbo, T., Lee, S., Feliciano, E., Trettin, C., Simard, M., A comparison of mangrove canopy height using multiple independent measurements from land, air, and space. Remote Sens., 8(4), 2016, 327 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040327.
33. Lewis, R.R., Ecological engineering for successful management and restoration of mangrove forests. Ecol. Eng. 24:4 SPEC. ISS. (2005), 403–418 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.10.003.
34. TM mangroves following Super Typhoon Haiyan. MPB 109:2 (2016), 734–743 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.080.
35. Lovelock, C.E., Feller, I.C., McKee, K.L., Thompson, R., Variation in mangrove forest structure and sediment characteristics in Bocas del Toro, Panama. Caribb. J. Sci. 41:3 (2005), 456–464 https://doi.org/ISSN 0008-6452.
36. Lovelock, C.E., Feller, I.C., Reef, R., Hickey, S., Ball, M.C., Mangrove dieback during fluctuating sea levels. Sci. Rep. Press, 2017, 1–8 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01927-6.
37. Lucas, R.M., Mitchell, A.L., Rosenqvist, A., Proisy, C., Melius, A., Ticehurst, C., The potential of L-band SAR for quantifying mangrove characteristics and change: case studies from the tropics. Aquatic Conservation Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 17 (2007), 245–264 https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.833.
38. Pendleton, L., Donato, D.C., Murray, B.C., Crooks, S., Jenkins, W.A., Sifleet, S., et al. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS One, 7(9), 2012, e43542 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043542.
39. Pettorelli, N., Vik, J.O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.M., Tucker, C.J., Stenseth, N.C., Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:9 (2005), 503–510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011.
40. Reef, R., Feller, I.C., Lovelock, C.E., Mammalian herbivores in Australia transport nutrients from terrestrial to marine ecosystems via mangroves. J. Trop. Ecol. 30:3 (2014), 179–188 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467414000054.
41. Ribeiro, M.C., Metzger, J.P., Martensen, A.C., Ponzoni, F.J., Hirota, M.M., The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 142:6 (2009), 1141–1153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021.
42. Robertson, A.I., Alongi, D.M., Front matter. Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems (Coastal an), 1992, American Geophysical Union https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118665084.fmatter.
43. Rogers, K., Boon, P.I., Branigan, S., Duke, N.C., Field, C.D., Fitzsimons, J.A., et al. The state of legislation and policy protecting Australia's mangrove and salt marsh and their ecosystem services. Mar. Policy 72 (2016), 139–155 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.025.
44. Saatchi, S.S., Harris, N., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E.T., Salas, W., et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Int. Water Power Dam Constr. 108:24 (2011), 9899–9904 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108.
45. Saenger, P., Snedaker, S.C., Pantropical trends in mangrove above-ground biomass and annual litterfall. Oecologia 96:3 (1993), 293–299 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317496.
46. Saintilan, N. (1997). Marine Freshwater Research &. Marine Freshwater Research, 48, 147–152.
47. Satyanarayana, B., Koedam, N., De Smet, K., Di Nitto, D., Bauwens, M., Jayatissa, L., et al. Long-term mangrove forest development in Sri Lanka: early predictions evaluated against outcomes using VHR remote sensing and VHR ground-truth data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 443 (2011), 51–63 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09397.
48. Sherman, R.E., Fahey, T.J., Martinez, P., Spatial patterns of biomass and aboveground net primary productivity in a mangrove ecosystem in the Dominican Republic. Ecosystems 6:4 (2003), 384–398 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0191-8.
49. Simard, M., Zhang, K., Rivera-monroy, V.H., Ross, M.S., Ruiz, P.L., Castañeda-moya, E., et al. Mapping height and biomass of mangrove forests in Everglades national Park with SRTM elevation data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 72:3 (2006), 299–311 https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.72.3.299.
50. Soares, M.L.G., Schaeffer-Novelli, Y., Above-ground biomass of mangrove species. I. Analysis of models. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 65:1–2 (2005), 1–18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.05.001.
51. Tam, N.F.Y., Li, S.H., Lan, C.Y., Chen, G.Z., Li, M.S., Wong, Y.S., Nutrients and heavy metal contamination of plants and sediments in Futian mangrove forest. Hydrobiologia 295:1–3 (1995), 149–158 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029122.
52. Tomlinson, P.B., The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge Tropical Biology Series. 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
53. Van Keulen, M., Langdon, M.W., Ningaloo Collaboration Cluster: Biodiversity and Ecology of the Ningaloo Reef Lagoon. 2011 CSIRO National Research Flagships.
54. Wannasiri, W., Nagai, M., Honda, K., Santitamnont, P., Miphokasap, P., Extraction of mangrove biophysical parameters using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. 5:4 (2013), 1787–1808 https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041787.