Welfare policy under new labour: Views from inside Westminster

Welfare Policy under New Labour: Views from inside Westminster

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-198

  Bochel, Hugh ^a   Defty, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033501696     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (171)

1. Appleby, J. and Coote, A. (2002) Five year health check: A review of health policy, 1997-2002, London: King’s Fund.
2. Archer, P. (1999) ‘The House of Lords, past, present and future’, The Political Quarterly, vol 70, no 4, pp 396-403.
3. Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (2004) ‘Multi-level governance and the study of the British state’, Public Policy and Administration, vol 19, no 1, pp 31-51.
4. Bagehot, W. (1867) The English constitution, London: Fontana.
5. Baker, D. (1997) ‘Collaborative research and the Members of Parliament project’, Politics, vol 17, no 1, pp 59-66.
6. Baker, D., Fountain, I., Gamble, A. and Ludlam, S. (1995) ‘Backbench Conservative attitudes to European integration’, The Political Quarterly, vol 66, no 2, pp 221-33.
7. Baker, D., Gamble, A., Ludlam, S. and Seawright, D. (1996) ‘Labour and Europe: a survey of MPs and MEPs’, The Political Quarterly, vol 67, pp 353-71.
8. Baldwin, N.D.J. (1999) ‘The membership and work of the House of Lords’, in P. Carmichael and B. Dickson (eds) The House of Lords: Its parliamentary and judicial roles, Oxford: Hart.
9. Barnett, N. (2003) ‘Local government, New Labour and ‘active welfare’:a case of “self responsiblisation”?', Public Policy and Administration, vol 18, no 3, pp 25-38.
10. Beer, S. H. (1965) Modern British Politics, London: Faber.
11. Beetham, D. (2003), ‘Political participation, mass protest and representative democracy’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol 56, no 4: pp 597-609.
12. Berrington, H. (1973) Backbench opinion in the House of Commons, 1945-55, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
13. Berrington, H. and Leece, J. (1977) ‘Measurement of backbench attitudes by Guttman scaling of early day motions: a pilot study, Labour 1968-69', British Journal of Political Science, vol 7, no 4, pp 529-40.
14. Bochel, C. and Bochel, H. (2004) The UK social policy process, Basingstoke:Palgrave.
15. Bochel, C. and Briggs, J. (2000) ‘Do women make a difference?', Politics, vol 20, no 2, pp 63-8.
16. Bochel, H. (1992) Parliament and welfare policy, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
17. Bogdanor, V. (1999) ‘Reform of the House of Lords: a sceptical view’, The Political Quarterly, vol 70, no 4, pp 375-82.
18. Bower, T. (2004) Gordon Brown, London: Harper Collins.
19. Brazier, A. (2000) Systematic scrutiny: Reforming the Select Committees, London: Hansard Society.
20. Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J. and Shephard, A. (2005) Poverty and inequality in Britain: 2005, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
21. Brown, G. (2005) ‘Make this a manifesto for children’, The Guardian, 5 January.
22. Burke, E. (1808) The works of Edmund Burke, Volume 3, London:Rivington.
23. Cabinet Office (1998) Modernising Parliament, reforming the House of Lords, London: The Stationery Office.
24. Cabinet Office (1999a) Professional policy making for the 21st century, London: Cabinet Office.
25. Cabinet Office (1999b) Modernising government, London: The Stationery Office.
26. Childs, S. (2004) New Labour’s women MPs: Women representing women, London: Routledge.
27. Childs, S. and Withey, J. (2004) ‘Women representatives acting for women: sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British Parliament’, Political Studies, vol 52, no 3, pp 552-64.
28. Clarke, J. (2004) Changing welfare, changing states, London: Sage Publications.
29. Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., Hughes, G. and Humphrey, J. (2002) ‘Guarding the public interest?', in J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin (eds) New managerialism, new welfare?, London: Sage Publications.
30. Commission to Strengthen Parliament (2000) Strengthening Parliament, London: Conservative Party.
31. Conservative Party (2005) Are you thinking what we’re thinking? It’s time for action, London: Conservative Party.
32. Cook, R. (2003) The point of departure, London: Simon and Schuster.
33. Cowley, P. (2001) ‘The Commons: Mr Blair’s lapdog?', Parliamentary Affairs, vol 54, no 4, pp 815-28.
34. Cowley, P. (2002) Revolts and rebellions: Parliamentary voting under Blair, London: Politico’s.
35. Cowley, P. (2005) The rebels: How Blair mislaid his majority, London:Politico’s.
36. Cowley, P. (2006) ‘Making Parliament matter?', in P. Dunleavy, R. Heffernan, P. Cowley and C. Hay (eds) Developments in British politics 8, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Cowley, P. and Stuart, M. (2004) ‘Parliament: more Bleak House than Great Expectations’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol 57, no 2, pp 301-14.
38. Crewe, E. (2005) Lords of Parliament, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
39. Curtice, J. and Fisher, S. (2003) ‘The power to persuade? A tale of two prime ministers’, in A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, C. Bromley and M. Phillips (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 20th report: Continuity and change over two decades, London: Sage Publications.
40. DCA (Department for Constitutional Affairs) (2003) Constitutional reform: Next steps for the House of Lords, London: DCA.
41. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1998a) Modernising local government: Local democracy and community leadership, London: The Stationery Office.
42. DETR (1998b) Modern local government: In touch with the people, London:The Stationery Office.
43. DETR (2000) Quality and choice: A decent home for all: The way forward for housing, London: DETR.
44. DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) (2001) Schools:Building on success: Raising standards, promoting diversity, achieving results, Cm 5050, London: The Stationery Office.
45. DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2001) Schools achieving success, Annesley: DfES Publications.
46. DH (Department of Health) (1999) Saving lives: Our healthier nation, London: The Stationery Office.
47. DH (2002) Government response to the House of Lords Select Committee Report on stem cell research, London: The Stationery Office.
48. DSS (Department of Social Security) (1998) A new contract for welfare:Partnership in pensions, London: The Stationery Office.
49. DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) (2005) Five year strategy:Opportunity and security throughout life, London: The Stationery Office.
50. Economic Affairs Committee (2003) Aspects of the economics of an ageing population, London: House of Lords.
51. EU (European Union) Committee (2004a) Ninth report: The European Working Time Directive: A response to the European Commission’s review, London: House of Lords.
52. EU Committee (2004b) Twenty-seventh report: Sexual Equality in Access to Goods and Services, London: House of Lords.
53. Finer, S.E., Berrington, H.B. and Bartholomew, D.S. (1961) Backbench opinion in the House of Commons, 1955-59, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
54. Fontana, A. and Frey, J.H. (2000) ‘The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text’, in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, London: Sage Publications, pp 645-72.
55. Gains, F. (2003) ‘Surveying the landscape of modernisation: executive agencies under New Labour’, Public Policy and Administration, vol 18, no 2, pp 4-20.
56. Game, C. (2002), ‘Britain’s "5 percent” local government revolution:the faltering impact of New Labour’s modernization agenda’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol 68, no 3, pp 405-17.
57. Garrett, J. (1992) Westminster: Does Parliament work?, London: Victor Gollancz.
58. Giddens, A. (2000) The third way and its critics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
59. Grant, W. (2004) ‘Pressure politics: the changing world of pressure groups’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol 57, no 2, pp 408-19.
60. Gregg, P., Waldfogel, J. and Washbrook, E. (2005) ‘That’s the way the money goes: expenditure patterns as real incomes rise for the poorest families with children’, in J. Hills and K. Stewart (eds) A more equal society? New Labour, poverty and social exclusion, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp 251-75.
61. Hailsham, Lord (1976) The elective dictatorship, London: BBC.
62. Hansard Society (2001) The challenge for Parliament: Making government accountable, Report of the Hansard Society Commission on Parliamentary Scrutiny, London: Vacher Dod Publishing.
63. Hazell, R. (2006) ‘Return of the constitution’, Prospect, no 119, February.
64. Healey, J., Gill, M. and McHugh, D. (2005) MPs and politics in our time, London: Hansard Society.
65. Health Select Committee (2002) The role of the private sector in the NHS, London: The Stationery Office.
66. Hedges, A. (2005) Perceptions of redistribution: Report on exploratory qualitative research, CASE paper 96, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics and Political Science.
67. Hennessy, P. (1995) The hidden wiring: Unearthing the British constitution, London: Victor Gollancz.
68. Hill, A. and Whichelow, A. (1964) What’s wrong with Parliament?, London:Penguin Books.
69. Hills, J. and Lelkes, O. (1999) ‘Social security, selective universalism and patchwork redistribution’, in R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, K. Thomson, L. Jarvis, C. Bromley and N. Stratford (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 16th report: Who shares New Labour values?, Aldershot:Ashgate.
70. HM Treasury (2005) Public expenditure statistical analyses 2005, London:The Stationery Office.
71. Hollis, C. (1949) Can Parliament survive?, London: Hollis and Carter.
72. Home Office (2004) Active communities: Headline findings from the 2003 Home Office Citizenship Survey, London: Home Office.
73. Hood, C. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, vol 69, no 1, pp 3-19.
74. House of Commons Information Office (2005) ‘Early day motions’, Factsheet P3, London: House of Commons.
75. House of Commons Library (2005) Modernisation of the House of Commons 1997-2005, House of Commons Research Paper 05/46, London: House of Commons.
76. House of Commons Library (2006) House of Lords - Continuing debate, House of Commons Research Note SN/PC/3895, London: House of Commons.
77. House of Lords (2004) ‘The work of the House of Lords - its role, functions and powers’, House of Lords Briefing, London: House of Lords.
78. House of Lords Information Office (2005) The work of the House of Lords, London: House of Lords.
79. Johnson, N. (1988) ‘Departmental Select Committees’, in M. Ryle and P.G. Richards (eds) The Commons under scrutiny, London:Routledge.
80. Joint Committee on House of Lords Reform (2002) House of Lords reform: First report, London: The Stationery Office.
81. Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Park, A. and Thomson, K. (eds) (1999) British Social Attitudes: The 16th report: Who shares New Labour values?, London:Ashgate/National Centre for Social Research.
82. Judge, D. (1990) Parliament and industry, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
83. Judge, D. (1999), Representation: Theory and practice in Britain, London:Routledge.
84. Kavanagh, D. (2004) ‘Political parties’, in B. Jones, D. Kavanagh, M. Moran and P. Norton (eds) Politics UK (5th edn), Harlow: Pearson, pp 263-90.
85. Kornberg, A. and Frasure, R.C. (1971) ‘Policy differences in British parliamentary parties’, American Political Science Review, vol 65, no 3, pp 694-703.
86. Labour Party, The (1997) New Labour: Because Britain deserves better, London: The Labour Party.
87. Labour Party, The (2005) Britain forward not back, London: The Labour Party.
88. Letwin, O. (2006) ‘Why we have signed up to Labour’s anti-poverty target’, The Guardian, 11 April.
89. Liaison Committee (2000) First report: Shifting the balance: Select Committees and the Executive, London: The Stationery Office.
90. Liberal Democratic Party (1997) Making the difference, London: Liberal Democratic Party.
91. Lipsey, D. (1994) ‘Do we really want more public spending?', in R. Jowell, J. Curtice, L. Brook, D. Ahrendt and A. Park (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 11th report, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
92. Lord Chancellor’s Department (2001) The House of Lords - Completing the reform, London: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
93. Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (2003) ‘Westminster women: the politics of presence’, Political Studies, vol 51, no 1, pp 84-102.
94. Lowe, R. (2005) The welfare state in Britain since 1945, Basingstoke:Palgrave.
95. Lund, B. (2002) Understanding state welfare, London: Sage Publications.
96. Major, J. (2003) The erosion of parliamentary government, London: Centre for Policy Studies.
97. Mandelson, P. and Liddle, R. (1996) The Blair revolution: Can New Labour deliver?, London: Faber and Faber.
98. Marsh, D., Smith, M.J. and Richards, D. (2001) Changing patterns of governance: Reinventing Whitehall, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
99. Marshall, P. and Laws, D. (eds) (2004) The orange book: Reclaiming Liberalism, London: Profiile Books.
100. May, T. (2001) Social research: Issues, methods and process, Buckingham:Open University Press.
101. Mitchell, A. (2005) ‘The backbenchers lament’, in N.D.J. Baldwin (ed) Parliament in the 21st century, London: Politico’s.
102. Modernisation Committee (1997) First report: The legislative process, London: The Stationery Office.
103. Modernisation Committee (1998) First report: The parliamentary calendar:Initial proposals, London: The Stationery Office.
104. Modernisation Committee (2002a) First report: Select Committees, London, The Stationery Office.
105. Modernisation Committee (2002b) Second report: Modernisation of the House of Commons: A reform programme, London: The Stationery Office.
106. Modernisation Committee (2004) First report: Connecting Parliament with the public, London: The Stationery Office.
107. Mooney, G. and Scott, G. (eds) (2005) Exploring social policy in the ʼnew’ Scotland, Bristol: The Policy Press.
108. NAO (National Audit Office) (2005) Comptroller and Auditor General’s standard report on the accounts of the Inland Revenue2004-05, London:National Audit Office.
109. Newman, J. (2001) Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society, London: Sage Publications.
110. Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. (1995) Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Norton, P. (1975) Dissension in the House of Commons, 1945-74, London:Macmillan.
112. Norton, P. (1978) Conservative dissidents, London: Temple Smith.
113. Norton, P. (1980) Dissension in the House of Commons, 1974-1979, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
114. Norton, P. (2003) ‘Cohesion without discipline: party voting in the House of Lords’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol 9, no 4, pp 57-72.
115. Norton, P. (2005) Parliament in British politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
116. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1993) Public management developments: Survey, Paris: OECD.
117. Packenham, R. (1970) ‘Legislatures and political development’, in A. Kornberg and L.D. Musolf (eds) Legislatures in developmental perspective, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
118. Page, B. (2005) Understanding public attitudes to tax and spend, London:MORI Social Research Institute.
119. Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Bromley, C., Phillips, M. and Johnson, M. (eds) (2005) British Social Attitudes: The 22nd report: Two terms of New Labour: The public’s reaction, London: Sage Publications/NATCEN.
120. Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Bromley, C. and Phillips, M. (eds) (2004) British Social Attitudes: The 21st report, London: Sage Publications/NATCEN.
121. Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Jarvis, L. and Bromley, C. (eds) (2003) British Social Attitudes: The 20th report: Continuity and change over two decades, London: Sage Publications/NATCEN.
122. Pensions Commission (2004) Pensions challenges and choices: The first report of the Pensions Commission, London: The Stationery Office.
123. Pensions Commission (2005) A new pension settlement of the twentyfirst century: The second report of the Pensions Commission, London: The Stationery Office.
124. Pitkin, H.F. (1967) The concept of representation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
125. Powell, M. (ed) (1999) New Labour, new welfare state?, Bristol: The Policy Press.
126. Public Accounts Committee (2005a) Fourth report: Fraud and error in benefit expenditure, London: The Stationery Office.
127. Public Accounts Committee (2005b) Fifteenth report: Managing risks to improve public services, London: The Stationery Office.
128. Public Administration Committee (2005) Fourth report: Choice, voice and public services, London: The Stationery Office.
129. Putnam, R.D. (1971) ‘Studying elite political culture: the case of ideology’, American Political Science Review, vol 65, no 3, pp 651-81.
130. Putnam, R.D. (1973) The beliefs of politicians, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
131. Puwar, N. (2004) ‘Thinking about making a difference’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol 6, pp 65-80.
132. Pym, H. and Kochan, N. (1998) Gordon Brown: The first year in power, London: Bloomsbury.
133. Rawnsley, A. (2001) Servants of the people: The inside story of New Labour, London: Penguin.
134. RCLTC (Royal Commission on Long-term Care) (1999) With respect to old age: Long-term care: Rights and responsibilities, London: The Stationery Office.
135. Richards, D. and Smith, M.J. (2002) Governance and public policy in the UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
136. Riddell, P. (2000) Parliament under Blair, London: Politico’s.
137. Riddell, P. (2004) ‘Prime Ministers and Parliament’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol 57, no 4, pp 814-29.
138. Rogers, R. and Walters, R. (2004) How Parliament works, Harlow:Pearson.
139. Rouse, J. and Smith, G. (2002) ‘Evaluating New Labour’s accountability reforms’, in M. Powell (ed) Evaluating New Labour’s welfare reforms, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp 39-60.
140. Rush, M. (1999) ‘The House of Lords: the political context’, in P. Carmichael and B. Dickson (eds) The House of Lords: Its parliamentary and judicial roles, Oxford: Hart.
141. Rush, M. (2001) The role of the Member of Parliament since 1868, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
142. Rush, M. (2005) Parliament today, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
143. Rush, M. and Ettinghausen, C. (2002) Opening up the usual channels, London: Hansard Society.
144. Russell, M. (2003) ‘Is the House of Lords already reformed?', The Political Quarterly, vol 74, no 3, pp 311-18.
145. Russell, M. and Cornes, R. (2001) ‘The Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords: a house for the future?', The Modern Law Review, vol 64, no 1, pp 82-99.
146. Russell, M. and Sciara, M. (2006a) ‘Why does the government get defeated in the House of Lords?', Paper presented to the Political Studies Association Conference, University of Reading.
147. Russell, M. and Sciara, M. (2006b) ‘Legitimacy and bicameral strength:a case study of the House of Lords’, Paper presented at the PSA Parliaments and Legislatures Specialist Group Conference, 16 June, University of Sheffield.
148. Science and Technology Committee (2000) Sixth report: Complementary and alternative medicine, London: House of Lords.
149. Searing, D.D. (1994) Westminster’s world: Understanding political roles, London: Harvard University Press.
150. Sefton, T. (2003) ‘What we want from the welfare state’, in A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, L. Jarvis and C. Bromley (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 20th report: Continuity and change over two decades, London:Sage Publications/NATCEN.
151. Seldon, A. and Snowdon, P. (2005) ‘The Conservative Party’, in A. Seldon and D. Kavanagh (eds) The Blair effect 2001-5, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp 131-56.
152. Shell, D. (1992) The House of Lords, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
153. Sutton Trust (2005) The educational backgrounds of Members of the House of Commons and the House of Lords, London: Sutton Trust.
154. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2001) ‘Welfare reform in the UK: the construction of a liberal consensus’, in P. Taylor-Gooby (ed) Welfare states under pressure, London: Sage Publications.
155. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) ‘The work-centred welfare state’, in A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, C. Bromley and M. Phillips (eds) British Social Attitudes: The 21st report, London: Sage Publications/NATCEN.
156. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005) ‘Attitudes to social justice’, in N. Pearce and W. Paxton (eds) Social justice: Building a fairer Britain, London: Politico’s/IPPR.
157. Taylor-Gooby, P. and Bochel, H. (1988) ‘Public opinion, party policy and MPs’ attitudes to welfare’, Political Quarterly, vol 59, no 2, pp 251-8.
158. Toynbee, P. and Walker, D. (2001) Did things get better? An audit of Labour’s successes and failures, London: Penguin.
159. Toynbee, P. and Walker, D. (2005) Better or worse? Has Labour delivered?, London: Bloomsbury.
160. Tyrie, A. (2000) Mr Blair’s poodle: An agenda for reviving the House of Commons, London: Centre for Policy Studies.
161. Wakeham, Lord (2000a) A House for the future: Royal Commission on the Reform of the House of Lords, London: The Stationery Office.
162. Wakeham, Lord (2000b) ‘The Lords: building a house for the future’, The Political Quarterly, vol 71, no 3, pp 277-81.
163. Wheeler-Booth, M. (2001) ‘Procedure: a case study of the House of Lords’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol 7, no 1, pp 77-92.
164. Whiteley, P. (1983) The Labour Party in crisis, London: Methuen.
165. Whiteley, P. and Winyard, S. (1987) Pressure for the poor, London:Methuen.
166. Willetts, D. (2000) Browned off: What’s wrong with Gordon Brown’s social policy?, London: Politeia.
167. Willetts, D. (2005a) ‘Compassionate Conservatism and the war on poverty’, Speech to the Centre for Social Justice (www.davidwilletts.org.uk).
168. Willetts, D. (2005b) ‘A new Conservatism for a new century’, Speech to the Social Market Foundation (www.davidwilletts.org.uk).
169. Williams, M. (2000) Crisis and consensus in British politics: From Bagehot to Blair, London: Macmillan.
170. Wright, T. (1997) ‘Does Parliament work?', Talking Politics, vol 9, no 3, pp 202-5.
171. Wright, T. (ed) (2000) The British political process: An introduction, London:Routledge.