An empirical examination of product counterfeiting crime impacting the U.S. military

Trends in Organized Crime

Volumn 20, Issue 3-4, 2017, Pages 316-337

  Sullivan, Brandon A ^a   Wilson, Jeremy M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfeit; Department of Defense; Military; National security; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

EID: 85033491709     PISSN: 10844791     EISSN: 19364830     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12117-017-9306-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chaudhry P, Zimmerman A (2009) The economics of counterfeit trade: governments, consumers, pirates and intellectual property rights. Springer, Heidelberg
2. Chermak SM, Freilich JD, Parkin WS, Lynch JP (2012) American terrorism and extremist crime data sources and selectivity bias: an investigation focusing on homicide events committed by far-right extremists. J Quant Criminol 28:191–218
3. Clarke RV, Eck JE (2005) Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/crimeanalysis60steps.pdf
4. Eck JE, Spelman W (1987) Problem solving: problem-oriented policing in Newport News. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
5. Goldstein H (1979) Improving policing: a problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency 24:236–258
6. Goldstein H (1990) Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill, New York
7. Heinonen JA, Wilson JM (2012) Product counterfeiting at the state level: an empirical examination of Michigan-related incidents. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 36(4):273–290
8. Heinonen JA, Holt TJ, Wilson JM (2012) Product counterfeits in the online environment. International Criminal Justice Review 22(4):353–371
9. Hollis ME, Wilson JM (2014) Who are the guardians in product counterfeiting? A theoretical application of routine activities theory. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 16:169–188
10. Kinghorn R (2012) A private sector perspective for Building public-private partnerships when investigating counterfeit products. A-CAPP Backgrounder Series. Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection, East Lansing. http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/files/Kinghorn_Partnerships_71812.pdf
11. OECD (2008) The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy.Organization for Economic co-Operation and Development, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/sti/38707619.pdf
12. OECD & EUIPO (2016) trade in counterfeit and pirated goods: mapping the economic impact. Organization for Economic co-Operation and Development and EU intellectual property Office (EUIPO), Paris http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/4216071e.pdf?expires=1461263003&id=id&accname=ocid177642&checksum=372247FB8F85E6A7097594030D5FB676
13. Phillips T (2005) Knockoff: the deadly trade in counterfeit goods. Kogan Page, Philadelphia
14. Satchwell G (2004) A sick business: counterfeit medicines and organised crime. The Stockholm Network, London
15. Sullivan BA, Chermak SM, Wilson JM, Freilich JD (2014) The nexus between terrorism and product counterfeiting in the United States. Global Crime 15(3–4):357–378
16. U.S. CBP (2017) Intellectual property rights Seizure Statistics. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of International Trade, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC. https://www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/ipr/statistics
17. U.S. DOC (2010) Defense Industrial Base Assessment: Counterfeit Electronics. Office of Technology Evaluation, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. http://www.agmaglobal.org/cms/uploads/BIS%20Survey%20(January%202010%20final).pdf
18. U.S. GAO (2010a) Defense Supplier Base: DOD should leverage ongoing initiatives in developing its Program to mitigate risk of counterfeit parts. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC http://www.gao.gov/assets/310/302313.pdf
19. U.S. GAO (2010b) Intellectual property: observations on efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and pirated goods. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf
20. U.S. GAO (2016) Counterfeit parts: DOD needs to improve reporting and oversight to reduce supply chain risk. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC http://www.gao.gov/assets/680/675227.pdf
21. U.S. SENATE (2012) Inquiry into Counterfeit Electronic Parts in the Department of Defense Supply Chain. Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-112srpt167/pdf/CRPT-112srpt167.pdf
22. UNICRI (2007) Counterfeiting: a global spread, a global threat. United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, Turin http://www.unicri.it/news/article/0712-3_counterfeiting_crt_foundation
23. United States V. Mccloskey (2011) Government’s Consolidated Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing and Motion for Downward Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §5K1.1, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, September 30, 2011
24. Wilson JM, Fenoff R (2014) Distinguishing counterfeit from authentic product retailers in the virtual marketplace. International Criminal Justice Review 24:39–58
25. Wilson JM, Sullivan BA (2016) Brand owner approaches to assessing the risk of product counterfeiting. J Brand Manag 23(3):327–344
26. Wilson JM, Sullivan BA, Hollis ME (2016) Measuring the “unmeasurable”: approaches to assessing the nature and extent of product counterfeiting. International Criminal Justice Review 26(3):259–276