Arthroscopic Versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review

Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 988-997

  Park, Jung Ho ^a   Kim, Hyun Jung ^b   Suh, Dong Hun ^a   Lee, Jin Woo ^c   Kim, Hak Jun ^d   Oh, Myung Jae ^a   Choi, Gi Won ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANKLE ARTHRODESIS; ANKLE OSTEOARTHRITIS SCALE; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMBASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; OPEN SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ANKLE; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROSCOPY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANKLE JOINT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROSCOPY; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85033223188     PISSN: 07498063     EISSN: 15263231     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.284     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Townshend, D., Di Silvestro, M., Krause, F., et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: A multicenter comparative case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 (2013), 98–102.
2. Coester, L.M., Saltzman, C.L., Leupold, J., Pontarelli, W., Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001), 219–228.
3. Peterson, K.S., Lee, M.S., Buddecke, D.E., Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis: A retrospective cost analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg 49 (2010), 242–247.
4. Marcus, R.E., Balourdas, G.M., Heiple, K.G., Ankle arthrodesis by chevron fusion with internal fixation and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65 (1983), 833–838.
5. O'Brien, T.S., Hart, T.S., Shereff, M.J., Stone, J., Johnson, J., Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: A comparative study. Foot Ankle Int 20 (1999), 368–374.
6. Collman, D.R., Kaas, M.H., Schuberth, J.M., Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: Factors influencing union in 39 consecutive patients. Foot Ankle Int 27 (2006), 1079–1085.
7. Nielsen, K.K., Linde, F., Jensen, N.C., The outcome of arthroscopic and open surgery ankle arthrodesis: A comparative retrospective study on 107 patients. Foot Ankle Surg 14 (2008), 153–157.
8. Stone, J.W., Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 11 (2006), 361–368 vi-vii.
9. Gougoulias, N.E., Agathangelidis, F.G., Parsons, S.W., Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 28 (2007), 695–706.
10. Ferkel, R.D., Hewitt, M., Long-term results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 26 (2005), 275–280.
11. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, 2009, b2535.
12. Domsic, R.T., Saltzman, C.L., Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int 19 (1998), 466–471.
13. Beaton, D.E., Schemitsch, E., Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res(413), 2003, 90–105.
14. Kitaoka, H.B., Alexander, I.J., Adelaar, R.S., Nunley, J.A., Myerson, M.S., Sanders, M., Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15 (1994), 349–353.
15. Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., Chipponi, J., Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73 (2003), 712–716.
16. Cicchetti, D.V., Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6 (1994), 284–290.
17. Myerson, M.S., Quill, G., Ankle arthrodesis. A comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(268), 1991, 84–95.
18. Panikkar, K.V., Taylor, A., Kamath, S., Henry, A.P.J., A comparison of open and arthroscopic ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Surg 9 (2003), 169–172.
19. Meng, Q., Yu, T., Yu, L., Zhao, X., Qi, C., Effectiveness comparison between arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodeses. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 27 (2013), 288–291 [in Chinese].
20. Winson, I.G., Robinson, D.E., Allen, P.E., Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005), 343–347.
21. Frey, C., Halikus, N.M., Vu-Rose, T., Ebramzadeh, E., A review of ankle arthrodesis: Predisposing factors to nonunion. Foot Ankle Int 15 (1994), 581–584.
22. Zvijac, J.E., Lemak, L., Schurhoff, M.R., Hechtman, K.S., Uribe, J.W., Analysis of arthroscopically assisted ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy 18 (2002), 70–75.
23. Cameron, S.E., Ullrich, P., Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy 16 (2000), 21–26.