Growth of Global Publishing Output of Health Economics in the Twenty-First Century: A Bibliographic Insight

Frontiers in Public Health

Volumn 5, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Jakovljevic, Mihajlo ^a   Pejcic, Ana V ^a  

^a University of Kragujevac Medical Faculty   (Serbia)

Author keywords

bibliography; economics; health; interdisciplinary; INTREPID; literature

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032918021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22962565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00211     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Campbell LM. Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conserv Biol (2005) 19:574–7.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00058.x
2. Rafols I. Knowledge integration and diffusion: measures and mapping of diversity and coherence. In: Ding Y Rousseau R Wolfram D, editors. Measuring Scholarly Impact. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2014). p. 169–90.
3. Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J R Soc Interface (2007) 4:707–19.10.1098/rsif.2007.021317327202
4. Jensen P Paradzinets K. The Many Dimensions of Interdisciplinarity. (2013). Available from: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00785249
5. Baldwin DWC. Some historical notes on interdisciplinary and interprofessional education and practice in health care in the USA. J Interprof Care (1996) 10:173–87.10.3109/13561829609034100
6. Kessel F Rosenfield P Anderson N. Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies from Health and Social Science. Oxford University Press (2008).
7. Kessel F Rosenfield P Anderson NB. Expanding the Boundaries of Health and Social Science: Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press (2003).
8. Jakovljevic MM Ogura S. Health economics at the crossroads of centuries – from the past to the future. Front Public Health (2016) 4:115.10.3389/fpubh.2016.0011527376055
9. Cochrane Community. NHS Economic Evaluation Database. (2015). Available from: http://community.cochrane.org/editorial-and-publishing-policy-resource/overview-cochrane-library-and-related-content/databases-included-cochrane-library/nhs-economic-evaluation-database
10. Rubin RM Chang CF. A bibliometric analysis of health economics articles in the economics literature: 1991-2000. Health Econ (2003) 12:403–14.10.1002/hec.80212720257
11. Wagstaff A Culyer AJ. Four decades of health economics through a bibliometric lens. J Health Econ (2012) 31:406–39.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.03.00222481096
12. Pitt C Goodman C Hanson K. Economic evaluation in global perspective: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Econ (2016) 25:9–28.10.1002/hec.330526804359
13. Mills A. Reflections on the development of health economics in low- and middle-income countries. Proc Biol Sci (2014) 281:20140451.10.1098/rspb.2014.045125009059
14. Jakovljevic M Getzen TE. Growth of global health spending share in low and middle income countries. Front Pharmacol (2016) 7:21.10.3389/fphar.2016.00021
15. Jakovljevic MM. Comparison of historical medical spending patterns among the BRICS and G7. J Med Econ (2016) 19:70–6.10.3111/13696998.2015.109349326366470
16. Jakovljevic M Potapchik E Popovich L Barik D Getzen TE. Evolving health expenditure landscape of the BRICS nations and projections to 2025. Health Econ (2016) 26:844–52.10.1002/hec.3406
17. COST Action INTREPID. Project Aim & Objectives. (2017). Available from: http://www.intrepid-cost.eu/about-intrepid/
18. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH. High Impact, Interdisciplinary Science in NIDDK Research Areas (RC2). (2017). Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-16-126.html
19. Department of Health and Human Services, NIH. Scientific Meetings for Creating Interdisciplinary Research Teams in Basic Behavioral and Social Science Research (R13). (2017). Available from: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-CA-10-017.html
20. National Science Foundation. Introduction to Interdisciplinary Research. (2017). Available from: https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/additional_resources/interdisciplinary_research/
21. Interdisciplinary Humanities Center. IHC Funding Opportunities. (2017). Available from: http://www.ihc.ucsb.edu/funding-opportunities/
22. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. International Joint Research Program. (2017). Available from: http://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-bottom/
23. Porter AL Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics (2009) 81:719–45.10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
24. Bozhkova E. Interdisciplinary Proposals Struggle to Get Funded. (2016). Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/interdisciplinary-proposals-struggle-to-get-funded-1.20189
25. Morillo F Bordons M Gómez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol (2003) 54:1237–49.10.1002/asi.10326
26. Rhoten D Parker A. Education. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science (2004) 306:2046.10.1126/science.1103628
27. Wagner CS Roessner JD Bobb K Klein JT Boyack KW Keyton J et al. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. J Informetr (2011) 5:14–26.10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004