SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages

Consultative review is worth the wait: Elife editors and reviewers consult with one another before sending out a decision after peer review. This means that authors do not have to spend time responding to confusing or conflicting requests for revisions

(1) King, Stuart R F a

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; CONSENSUS; CONSULTATION; HUMAN; NEUROSCIENCE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 85032914469 PISSN: None EISSN: 2050084X Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.32012 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (6)

References (10)

1
- 84977497125
- SfN journals: Two paths, one goal: Sharing strong science
- PMID: 27383584
- Bernard C, Picciotto M. 2016. SfN journals: Two paths, one goal: Sharing strong science. Journal of Neuroscience 36:7075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1863-16.2016, PMID: 27383584
- (2016) Journal of Neuroscience , vol.36 , pp. 7075
- Bernard, C.¹ Picciotto, M.²

2
- 85032912669
- The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s
- Cobb M. 2017. The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PeerJ Preprints 5:e3174v1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj. preprints.3174v1
- (2017) Peerj Preprints , vol.5
- Cobb, M.¹

3
- 85011006332
- The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
- Giordan M, Csikasz-Nagy A, Collings AM, Vaggi F. 2016. The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 5:683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8452.2
- (2016) F1000research , vol.5 , pp. 683
- Giordan, M.¹ Csikasz-Nagy, A.² Collings, A.M.³ Vaggi, F.⁴

4
- 85000916345
- A biology journal provides a lesson in peer review
- Goldstein RE. 2016. A biology journal provides a lesson in peer review. Physics Today 69:12-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.3378
- (2016) Physics Today , vol.69 , pp. 11-12
- Goldstein, R.E.¹

5
- 84964694212
- The pleasure of publishing
- Malhotra V, Marder E. 2015. The pleasure of publishing. eLife 4:e05770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05770
- (2015) Elife , vol.4 , pp. e05770
- Malhotra, V.¹ Marder, E.²

6
- 84995485493
- The plant cell begins opt-in publishing of peer review reports
- PMID: 27756816
- Merchant S, Eckardt NA. 2016. The plant cell begins opt-in publishing of peer review reports. The Plant Cell 28:2343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00798, PMID: 27756816
- (2016) The Plant Cell , vol.28 , pp. 2343
- Merchant, S.¹ Eckardt, N.A.²

7
- 79955528317
- End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments
- PMID: 21525890
- Ploegh H. 2011. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments. Nature 472:391. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1038/472391a, PMID: 21525890
- (2011) Nature , vol.472 , pp. 391
- Ploegh, H.¹

8
- 84984817859
- Introducing cross-referee commenting in peer review
- PMID: 27578173
- Pourquié O, Brown K. 2016. Introducing cross-referee commenting in peer review. Development 143:3035-3036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.143198, PMID: 27578173
- (2016) Development , vol.143 , pp. 3035-3036
- Pourquié, O.¹ Brown, K.²

9
- 78649710443
- A transparent black box
- PMID: 21124296
- Pulverer B. 2010. A transparent black box. The EMBO Journal 29:3891-3892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.307, PMID: 21124296
- (2010) The EMBO Journal , vol.29 , pp. 3891-3892
- Pulverer, B.¹

10
- 84879049445
- The eLife approach to peer review
- PMID: 23638304
- Schekman R, Watt F, Weigel D. 2013. The eLife approach to peer review. eLife 2:e00799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00799, PMID: 23638304
- (2013) Elife , vol.2 , pp. e00799
- Schekman, R.¹ Watt, F.² Weigel, D.³

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.