Assessment of Options for Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope

Assessment of Options for Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-143

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANNED SPACE FLIGHT; NASA; ROBOTICS; SPACE SHUTTLES; SPACE TELESCOPES;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPES; NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; ROBOTIC SERVICING; SERVICE MISSIONS; SERVICING MISSIONS; SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIA; TELESCOPE SYSTEM;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85032844894     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.17226/11169     Document Type: Book

References (33)

1. National Research Council, 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
2. Steve Beckwith, Space Telescope Science Institute/NASA, Future Science Expected from HST,presentation for the Committee on the Assessment of Options for Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope, dated June 22, 2004.
3. Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report, Volume I, August, 2003. Available online at http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html.
4. Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report, Volume I, August, 2003. Available online at http://www.nasa.gov/ columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html.
5. National Research Council, Assessment of Options for Extending the Life of the Hubble Space Telescope,July 13, 2004. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/html/ Hubble_Space:Telescope/letter_report.pdf.
6. National Research Council, 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
7. HST-JWST Transition Panel, Report of the HST-JWST Transition Panel, August 14, 2003. Available online at http:// www.nasa.gov/pdf/49151main_hst-jwst.pdf.
8. NASA, NASAs Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond, Volume 1, Revision 1, October 15, 2003. This and subsequent revisions (2.1, July 28, 2004; 2.2, August 27, 2004) are available online at www.nasa.gov/news/ highlights/returntoflight.html.
9. Steven J. Gentz, NASA Engineering and Safety Center, Technical Consultation of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Nickel Hydrogen (NiH2) Battery Charge Capacity Prediction, RP-04-08, June 17, 2004, NASA.
10. Robert W. Smith, 1993, The Space Telescope: A Study of NASA, Science, Technology, and Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
11. J.M.Logsdon, ed., 2001, Exploring the Unknown, NASA History Series, NASA, Washington, D.C.
12. National Research Council, 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
13. http://www.kepler.arc.nasa.gov/.
14. David Charbonneau, Hubbles View of Transiting Planets, in From Planets to Cosmology: Essential Science in Hubbles Final Years, STScI 2004 May Symposium, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Md., in press.
15. National Research Council, 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
16. Helen Wong, 2002, Hubble Space Telescope Reliability Assessment, July 2002 Model,July 28, 2004.
17. Herbert Hecht and Myron Hecht, Spacecraft Electronic Reliability Prediction, Rome Air Development Center Report RADC-TR-85-229, December 1985, Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, N.Y.
18. H. Leidecker,A.H. Zimmerman, Life Projection for the Hubble Space Telescope Nickle-Hydrogen Batteries, Aerospace Report No. ATR-2004(8180)-3, Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, Calif., March 15, 2004.
19. G. Lum, Radiation Reliability Assessment of the Hubble Space Telescope Electronics, Lockheed Martin Technical Memo TM12-97, February 28, 1998.
20. K. Yoshida, 2000, Space Robot Dynamics and Control: To Orbit, from Orbit, and Future, in Robotics Research: The 9th International Symposium, J. Hollerbach and D. Koditschek (eds.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 449-456.
21. Aerospace Corporation, Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Analyses of Alternatives, Final Delivery Executive Summary, August 3, 2004, Aerospace Corporation.
22. Department of Defense (DOD), 2003, Report of the Defense Science Board/Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Joint Task Force on Acquisition of National Security Space Programs, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, DOD, Washington, D.C.
23. Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report, Volume I, August, 2003, p. 174 (Requirement 6.4-1), p. 95 (Requirement 4.2-4). Available online at http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html.
24. NASA, NASAs Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond, December 3, 2004, p. 2-5. Available online at www.nasa.gov/news/highlights/returntoflight.html.
25. NASA, NASAs Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond, December 3, 2004, p. 2-3. Available online at www.nasa.gov/news/highlights/returntoflight.html.
26. NASA, Review of Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Mission Cost,letter report dated August 13, 2004, NASA, Washington, D.C.
27. NASA, STS-41-C National Space Transportation Systems Program Mission Report (JSC-19642), NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex., May 1984.
28. NASA, Space Shuttle Mission Report NSTS-08288, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex., February 1994.
29. NASA, Space Shuttle Mission Report NSTS-37413, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex., April 1997.
30. NASA, STS-109 Space Shuttle Mission Report NSTS-37437, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex., May 2002.
31. NASA, First 100 Manned Space Missions, NASA Kennedy Space Center Public Affairs Office, June 14, 1995, available online at http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-d/mission-51-d.html.
32. S. Kaplan and B.J. Garrick, 1981, On the Quantitative Definition of Risk,Risk Analysis 1(1): 11-27.
33. Aerospace Corporation, Hubble Space Telescope Servicing Analyses of Alternatives, Final Delivery Executive Summary, August 3, 2004, Aerospace Corporation.