Supporting and monitoring the creativity of IS personnel during the requirements engineering process

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2000-January, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Nguyen, L ^a   Carroll, J ^a   Swatman, P A ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

DESIGN RATIONALE; FIELD STUDIES; IS PERSONNEL; PROBLEM DOMAIN; PROBLEM SPACE; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS; REQUIREMENTS MODELLING; REQUIREMENTS MODELS;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 85032809593     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Batra, D., Davis, J. G. (1992). Conceptual data modelling in database design: similarities and differences between expert and novice designers, International Journal Man-Machine Studies 37: 83-101.
2. Brooks, F.P. (1987). No silver bullet. Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer, 20, 4, 10-19 (April).
3. Bubenko, J.A. (1995). Challenges in Requirements Engineering, RE'95: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 160-162.
4. Carroll, J., Swatman, P. A. (1998). The process of deriving requirements: Learning from practice, Proceedings of the ninth annual Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney Australia.
5. Chaiyasut, P. and Shanks, G. (1994) Conceptual Data Modelling Process: A Study of Novice and Expert Data Modellers, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Object-role Modelling, Magnetic Island, Australia, (July), 310-333.
6. Christel, M. G., Kang, K. C. (1992). Issues in requirements elicitation, ESC-TR-92-012 CMU/SEI-92-TR-12, Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213.
7. Conklin, E. J., Yakemovic, K. B. (1991). A process-oriented approach to design rationale, Human Computer-Interaction 6: 357-394.
8. Deming, W. (1986). Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge Mass.
9. Fischer, G., Lemke, A. C., McCall, Morch, A. I. (1991). Making argumentation serve design, Human-Computer Interaction 6: 393-419.
10. Guindon, R. (1989). The process of knowledge discovery in system design, in G. Salvendy, M. J. Smith (eds), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam Netherlands, 727-734.
11. Guindon, R. (1990). Knowledge exploited by experts during software system design, International Journal Man-Machine Studies 33: 279-304.
12. Humphrey, W. (1989). Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
13. Kant, E., Newell, A. (1984). Problem Solving Techniques for the Design of Algorithms, Information Processing and Management, 20:1-2, 91-118.
14. Khushalani, A. J. (1997). Modelling and supporting opportunistic design problem solving, PhD thesis, School of Computer Science and Software Engineering Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne Australia.
15. Khushalani, A., Smith, R., Howard, S. (1994). What happens when designers donst play by the rules: towards a model of opportunistic behaviour in design, Australian Journal of Information Systems, 13-31 (May).
16. Loucopoulos, P., Karakostas, V. (1995). System requirements engineering, McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe.
17. Lubars, M., Potts, C., Richter, C. (1993). A review of the state of the practice in requirements modelling, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering: RE'93, Sponsored by IEEE Computer Society, IEEE Computer Society Press, San Diego California, 2-14.
18. MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Belloti, V., Moran, T. (1991). Question, Option, and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis, Human-Computer Interaction 6: 201-250.
19. Malhotra, A., Thomas, J. C., Carroll, J. M., Miller, L. A. (1980). Cognitive processes in design, International journal Man-Machine Studies 12: 119-140.
20. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn, SAGE Publications.
21. Nguyen, L., Swatman, P. A. (1999). Essential and incidental complexity in requirements models, Technical Report 1999/15, School of Management Information Systems Deakin University, Victoria Australia.
22. Nguyen, L., Swatman, P. A., Shanks, G. (1998). Supplementing process-oriented with structure-oriented design explanation within Formal Object-Oriented Method, Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference ASWEC'98, Adelaide Australia.
23. Nguyen, L., Swatman, P. A., Shanks, G. (1999). Using design explanation within Formal Object-Oriented Method, to appear in Requirements Engineering Journal.
24. Robillard, P. (1999). The role of knowledge in software development, Communication of the ACM 42(1): 87-92.
25. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, New York: Basic Books.
26. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Schon, D. (1996). Reflective conversation with materials, in T. Winograd (ed.), Bringing Design to Software, New York: ACM Press, 171-184.
28. Shum, S. (1996). Analyzing the usability of a design rationale notation, in T. Morgan, J. Carroll (eds), Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers, New Jersey, chapter 6, 185-215.
29. Simsion, G. C. (1994). Data Modelling Essentials: Analysis, Design and Innovation, UNR computer library, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
30. Sutcliffe, A. G., Maiden, N. A. M. (1992). Analysing the novice analyst: cognitive models in software engineering, International Journal Man-Machine Studies 36: 719-740.
31. Visser, W. (1992). Designers' activities examined at three levels: organisation, strategies and problem-solving processes, Knowledge-Based Systems 5(1): 92-104.
32. Wallas, G. (1926), The Art of Thought, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: New York.