Developmental increases in white matter network controllability support a growing diversity of brain dynamics

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Tang, Evelyn ^a   Giusti, Chad ^a   Baum, Graham L ^b   Gu, Shi ^a   Pollock, Eli ^b   Kahn, Ari E ^a   Roalf, David R ^b   Moore, Tyler M ^b   Ruparel, Kosha ^b   Gur, Ruben C ^b   Gur, Raquel E ^b   Satterthwaite, Theodore D ^b   Bassett, Danielle S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN; COGNITION; CONNECTIVITY; IMAGING METHOD; NERVOUS SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION;

BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JUVENILE; MALE; WHITE MATTER; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE NET; WHITE MATTER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85032690861     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01254-4     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Johansen-Berg, H. Behavioural relevance of variation in white matter microstructure. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 23, 351-358 (2010).
2. Hermundstad, A. M. et al. Structurally-constrained relationships between cognitive states in the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003591 (2014).
3. Di Martino, A. et al. Unraveling the miswired connectome: a developmental perspective. Neuron 83, 1335-1353 (2014).
4. Baum, G. L. et al. Modular segregation of structural brain networks supports the development of executive function in youth. arXiv 1608, 03619 (2016).
5. Sporns, O. Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 652-660 (2014).
6. Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., Pantelis, C. & Bullmore, E. T. Schizophrenia, neuroimaging and connectomics. Neuroimage 62, 2296-2314 (2012).
7. Kailath, T. Linear Systems. Information and System Sciences Series (Prentice- Hall, 1980).
8. Pecora, L. M. & Carroll, T. L. Master stability functions for synchronized coupled systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2109-2112 (1998).
9. Pasqualetti, F., Zampieri, S. & Bullo, F. Controllability metrics, limitations and algorithms for complex networks. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 1, 40-52 (2014).
10. Gu, S. et al. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nat. Commun. 6 (2015).
11. Betzel, R. F., Gu, S., Medaglia, J. D., Pasqualetti, F. & Bassett, D. S. Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology. Sci. Rep. 6, 30770 (2016).
12. Senden, M., Deco, G., de Reus, M. A., Goebel, R. & van den Heuvel, M. P. Rich club organization supports a diverse set of functional network configurations. Neuroimage 96, 174-182 (2014).
13. Bassett, D. S., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Achard, S., Duke, T. & Bullmore, E. Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19518-19523 (2006).
14. Fries, P. Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. Neuron 88, 220-235 (2015).
15. Jirsa, V. K., Stacey, W. C., Quilichini, P. P., Ivanov, A. I. & Bernard, C. On the nature of seizure dynamics. Brain 137, 2210-2230 (2014).
16. Khambhati, A. N., Davis, K. A., Lucas, T. H., Litt, B. & Bassett, D. S. Virtual cortical resection reveals push-pull network control preceding seizure evolution. Neuron 91, 1170-1182 (2016).
17. Satterthwaite, T. D. et al. Neuroimaging of the philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. Neuroimage 86, 544-553 (2014).
18. Avena-Koenigsberger, A. et al. Using pareto optimality to explore the topology and dynamics of the human connectome. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369, 20130530 (2014).
19. Latora, V. & Marchiori, M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 198701 (2001).
20. Newman, M. E. J. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8577-8582 (2006).
21. Benchmarking measures of network controllability on canonical graph models. arXiv 1706, 05117 (2017).
22. Barahona, M. & Pecora, L. M. Synchronization in small-world systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 054101 (2002).
23. Nishikawa, T. & Motter, A. E. Network synchronization landscape reveals compensatory structures, quantization, and the positive effect of negative interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10342-10347 (2010).
24. Chai, L. et al. Evolution of brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment. Netw. Neurosci. 1, 14-30 (2017).
25. Sporns, O. & Betzel, R. F. Modular brain networks. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 613-640 (2016).
26. Bassett, D. S. et al. Robust detection of dynamic community structure in networks. Chaos 23, 013142 (2013).
27. Hagmann, P. et al. White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19067-19072 (2010).
28. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 10, P1000 (2008).
29. Mucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A. & Onnela, J.-P. Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science 328, 876-878 (2010).
30. Girvan, M. & Newman, M. E. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7821-7826 (2002).
31. Honey, C. J. et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2035-2040 (2009).
32. Fernández Galán, R. On how network architecture determines the dominant patterns of spontaneous neural activity. PLoS ONE 3, e2148 (2008).
33. Muldoon, S. F. et al. Stimulation-based control of dynamic brain networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005076 (2016).
34. Gu, S. et al. Optimal trajectories of brain state transitions. Neuroimage 148, 305-317 (2017).
35. Tang, E. & Bassett, D. S. Control of dynamics in brain networks. arXiv 1701, 01531 (2017).
36. Wallis, G., Stokes, M., Cousijn, H., Woolrich, M. & Nobre, A. C. Frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks play dissociable roles in control of working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 2019-2034 (2015).
37. Botvinick, M. M. & Cohen, J. D. The computational and neural basis of cognitive control: charted territory and new frontiers. Cogn. Sci. 38, 1249-1285 (2014).
38. Klimm, F., Bassett, D. S., Carlson, J. M. & Mucha, P. J. Resolving structural variability in network models and the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003491 (2014).
39. Miyake, A. et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 41, 49-100 (2000).
40. Jarbo, K. & Verstynen, T. D. Converging structural and functional connectivity of orbitofrontal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and posterior parietal cortex in the human striatum. J. Neurosci. 35, 3865-3878 (2015).
41. Chrysikou, E. G., Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. The other side of cognitive control: can a lack of cognitive control benefit language and cognition? Top. Cogn. Sci. 3, 253-256 (2011).
42. Seghete, K. L., Herting, M. M. & Nagel, B. J. White matter microstructure correlates of inhibition and task-switching in adolescents. Brain Res. 1527, 15-28 (2013).
43. Cerliani, L. et al. Increased functional connectivity between subcortical and cortical resting-state networks in autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 767-777 (2015).
44. Mitra, A., Mitra, S. S. & Tsien, R. W. Heterogeneous reallocation of presynaptic efficacy in recurrent excitatory circuits adapting to inactivity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 250-257 (2012).
45. Bassett, D. S. et al. Efficient physical embedding of topologically complex information processing networks in brains and computer circuits. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000748 (2010).
46. Roalf, D. R. et al. The impact of quality assurance assessment on diffusion tensor imaging outcomes in a large-scale population-based cohort. Neuroimage 125, 903-919 (2016).
47. Vandekar, S. N. et al. Topologically dissociable patterns of development of the human cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 35, 599-609 (2015).
48. Maier-Hein, K. et al. Tractography-based connectomes are dominated by falsepositive connections. bioRxiv DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/084137 (2016).
49. Moore, T. M., Reise, S. P., Gur, R. E., Hakonarson, H. & Gur, R. C. Psychometric properties of the penn computerized neurocognitive battery. Neuropsychology 29, 235-246 (2015).
50. Daducci, A. et al. The connectome mapper: an open-source processing pipeline to map connectomes with mri. PLoS ONE 7, 1-9 (2012).
51. Kalman, R. E., Ho, Y. C. & Narendra, K. S. Controllability of linear dynamical systems. Contrib. Differ. Equ. 1, 189-213 (1963).
52. Watanabe, T., Masuda, N., Megumi, F., Kanai, R. & Rees, G. Energy landscape and dynamics of brain activity during human bistable perception. Nat. Commun. 5, 4765 (2014).
53. Deco, G., Rolls, E. T. & Romo, R. Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function. Prog. Neurobiol. 88, 1-16 (2009).
54. Watanabe, T. et al. A pairwise maximum entropy model accurately describes resting-state human brain networks. Nat. Commun. 4, 1370 (2013).
55. Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., Cocchi, L., Gollo, L. L. & Breakspear, M. Time-resolved resting-state brain networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10341-10346 (2014).
56. Shine, J. M., Koyejo, O. & Poldrack, R. A. Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9888-9891 (2016).
57. Nelson, S. B. & Turrigiano, G. G. Strength through diversity. Neuron 60, 477-482 (2008).
58. Botvinick, M. & Braver, T. Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 83-113 (2015).
59. Rosenblatt, F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev. 65, 386-408 (1958).
60. Bishop, C. M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (Oxford University Press, 1995).
61. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & the PDP Research Group. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1 (MIT Press, 1986).
62. Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R. & Donaldson, D. I. Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron 39, 713-726 (2003).
63. Dosenbach, N. U. et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11073-11078 (2007).
64. Eisenreich, B., Akaishi, R. & Hayden, B. Control without controllers: towards a distributed neuroscience of executive control. bioRxiv 9, 1684-1698 (2016).
65. Gratton, C., Laumann, T. O., Gordon, E. M., Adeyemo, B. & Petersen, S. E. Evidence for two independent factors that modify brain networks to meet task goals. Cell Rep. 17, 1276-1288 (2016).
66. Cole, M. W., Ito, T., Bassett, D. S. & Schultz, D. H. Activity flow over restingstate networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1718-1726 (2016).
67. Bertolero, M. A., Yeo, B. T. & D'Esposito, M. The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6798-E6807 (2015).
68. Huang, L., Chen, Q., Lai, Y.-C. & Pecora, L. M. Generic behavior of masterstability functions in coupled nonlinear dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. E 80, 036204 (2009).
69. Sizemore, A. E., Giusti, C. & Bassett, D. S. Classification of weighted networks through mesoscale homological features. J. Complex Netw. 5, 245-273 (2017).
70. Muldoon, S. F., Bridgeford, E. W. & Bassett, D. S. Small-world propensity and weighted brain networks. Sci Rep. 6, 22057 (2016).