Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: Results from an international survey

Implementation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Birken, Sarah A ^a   Powell, Byron J ^a   Shea, Christopher M ^a   Haines, Emily R ^a,b   Alexis Kirk, M ^a,b   Leeman, Jennifer ^c   Rohweder, Catherine ^c   Damschroder, Laura ^d   Presseau, Justin ^e,f  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research   (United States)

^e OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Criteria for selection; Framework; Implementation theory; Theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONSENSUS; E-MAIL; FERTILITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; SCIENTIST; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PROCEDURES;

FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; MALE;

EID: 85032581616     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Foy RJ, Ovretveit J, Shekelle PJ, Pronovost PJ, Taylor SL, Dy S, et al. The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety procedures. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(5):453-9.
2. Department of Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative. Implementation Guide. 2013. https://www.queri.research.va.gov/implementation/default.cfm#1https://www.queri.research.va.gov/implementation/default.cfm#1. Accessed 30 May 2017.
3. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, Baumann AA, Hamilton AM, Santens RL. Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients. Implement Sci. 2012;7:96.
4. Tinkle M, Kimball R, Haozous EA, Shuster G, Meize-Grochowski R. Dissemination and implementation research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2015-2012. Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:909606.
5. Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14.
6. Colquhoun HL, Letts LJ, Law MC, MacDermid JC, Missiuna CA. A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77(5):270-9.
7. Powell BJ, Proctor EK, Glass JE. A systematic review of strategies for implementing empirically supported mental health interventions. Res Soc Work Pract. 2014;24(2):192-212.
8. Liang L, Bernhardsson S, Vernooj RW, Armstrong MJ, Bussières A, Brouwers MC, Gagliardi AR. Use of theory to plan or evaluate guideline implementation among physicians: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017;12:26.
9. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci. 2016;11:72.
10. Helfrich CD, Damschroder LJ, Hagedorn HJ, Daggett GS, Sahay A, Ritchie M, et al. A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2010;5:82.
11. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38-46.
12. Kessler RS, Purcell EP, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Benkeser RM, Peek CJ. What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model? Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(1):44-66.
13. Haas JS, Iyer A, Oray EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(9):961-9.
14. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers D, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337-50.
15. Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare processional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35.
16. Tabak RE, Chambers KD, Brownson R. A narrative review and synthesis of frameworks in dissemination and implementation research. Presented at 5th Annual NIH Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation: Research at the Crossroads. Bethesda; 2012.
17. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araujo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(1):1-7.
18. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
19. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Presseau J, Kirk MA, Lorencatto F, Gould NJ, et al. Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12:2.
20. The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioral Research Group (ICEBeRG). Designing theoretically informed implementation interventions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:4.
21. Wacker JG. A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag. 1998;16(4):361-85.
22. Holmström J, Truex D. What does it mean to be an informed IS researcher? Some criteria for the selection and use of social theories in IS research. Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandanavia (IRIS). 2001;313-326.
23. Elo SS, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15.
24. Oxman AD, Frethein M, Flottorp S. The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(2):113-6.
25. Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Garfinkel S, Zwarenstein M. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: fine in theory but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed. Implement Sci. 2006;1:5.
26. Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Chiu M, Schaefer CT. From strategy to action: how top managers' support increases middle managers' commitment to innovation implementation in health care organizations. Health Care Manag Rev. 2015;40(2):159-68.
27. Yukl G, Gordon A, Taber T. A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: integrating a half century of behavior research. JLOS. 2002;9(1):15-32.
28. Alexander JA, Markovitz AR, Paustian ML, Wise CG, El Reda DK, Green LA, et al. Implementation of patient-centered medical homes in adult primary care practices. Med Care Res Rev. 2015;72(4):438-67.
29. Klein JK, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21:1055-80.
30. Birken SA. Developing a tool to promote the selection of appropriate implementation frameworks and theories. NC TRaCS Institute (TSMPAR11601), September 2016 - August 2017.
31. Kane M, Trochim WM. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. SAGE: Thousand Oaks; 2007.