Health benefits, ecological threats of low-carbon electricity

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2017, Pages

  Gibon, Thomas ^a,c   Hertwich, Edgar G ^b   Arvesen, Anders ^a   Singh, Bhawna ^a   Verones, Francesca ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b Yale University   (United States)

^c LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

Biomass energy; Climate change mitigation; Consequential life cycle assessment; Ecosystem impact; Energy scenario; Integrated hybrid life cycle assessment; LCA

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL STORAGE; HEALTH; HEALTH RISKS; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR FUELS; POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; SUPPLY CHAINS;

BIO-MASS ENERGY; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CONSEQUENTIAL LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY SCENARIOS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA);

ECOLOGY;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; BIOMASS POWER; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; ENERGY POLICY; FOSSIL FUEL; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR POWER; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EID: 85032361519     PISSN: 17489318     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6047     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Dubash N K, Hagemann M, Höhne N and Upadhyaya P 2013 Developments in national climate change mitigation legislation and strategy Clim. Policy 13 649-64
2. Somanathan E et al 2014 National and sub-national policies and institutions Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change ed O Edenhofer et al (Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
3. Bruckner T et al Energy systems Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change ed O Edenhofer et al (Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) 2014
4. Ürge-Vorsatz D, Herrero S T, Dubash N K and Lecocq F 2014 Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39 549-82
5. von Stechow C et al 2015 Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40 363-94
6. Hellweg S and Milà i Canals L 2014 Emerging approaches challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment Science 344 1109-13
7. Blanco G et al 2014 Drivers trends and mitigation Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change ed O Edenhofer et al (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
8. Turconi R, Boldrin A and Astrup T 2013 Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview comparability and limitations Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 28 555-65
9. Masanet E, Chang Y, Gopal A R, Larsen P, Morrow W R, Sathre R, Shehabi A and Zhai P 2013 Life-cycle assessment of electric power systems Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 38 107-36
10. Treyer K and Bauer C 2016 Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database-part I: electricity generation Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21 1236-54
11. Volkart K, Bauer C, Burgherr P, Hirschberg S, Schenler W and Spada M 2016 Interdisciplinary assessment of renewable nuclear and fossil power generation with and without carbon capture and storage in view of the new Swiss energy policy Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 54 1-14
12. Treyer K and Bauer C 2016 The environmental footprint of UAE's electricity sector: combining life cycle assessment and scenario modeling Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 55 1234-47
13. IEA 2010 Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050 (Paris: OECD/IEA) p 650
14. Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, Schryver A D, Struijs J and Zelm R V 2013 ReCiPe 2008: A Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method which Comprises Harmonised Category Indicators at the Midpoint and the Endpoint Level revised edition (Den Haag: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment)
15. Gibon T, Wood R, Arvesen A, Bergesen J D, Suh S and Hertwich E G 2015 A methodology for integrated, multiregional life cycle assessment scenarios under largescale technological change Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 11218-26
16. Hertwich E G, Gibon T, Bouman E A, Arvesen A, Suh S, Heath G A, Bergesen J D, Ramirez A, Vega M I and Shi L 2015 Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of lowcarbon technologies Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 6277-82
17. Hertwich E G et al 2016 Green Energy Choices: The Benefits, Risks and Trade-offs of Low-Carbon Technologies for Electricity Production (Nairobi, Kenya and Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme)
18. Bergesen J D, Tähkämö L, Gibon T and Suh S 2016 Potential long-term global environmental implications of efficient light-source technologies J. Ind. Ecol. 20 263-75
19. Beucker S, Bergesen J D and Gibon T 2016 Building energy management systems: global potentials and environmental implications of deployment J. Ind. Ecol. 20 223-33
20. Kulczycka J, Lelek L, Lewandowska A, Wirth H and Bergesen J D 2016 Environmental impacts of energyefficient pyrometallurgical copper smelting technologies: The consequences of technological changes from 2010 to 2050 J. Ind. Ecol. 20 304-16
21. Nahlik M J, Kaehr A T, Chester M V, Horvath A and Taptich M N 2016 Goods Movement life cycle assessment for greenhouse gas reduction goals J. Ind. Ecol. 20 317-28
22. Taptich M N, Horvath A and Chester M V 2016 Worldwide greenhouse gas reduction potentials in transportation by 2050 J. Ind. Ecol. 20 329-40
23. Berrill P, Arvesen A, Scholz Y, Gils H C and Hertwich E G 2016 Environmental impacts of high penetration renewable energy scenarios for Europe Environ. Res. Lett. 11 014012
24. Bergesen J D, Heath G A, Gibon T and Suh S 2014 Thinfilm photovoltaic power generation offers decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing environmental cobenefits in the long term Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 9834-43
25. Singh B, Bouman E A, Strømman A H and Hertwich E G 2015 Material use for electricity generation with carbon dioxide capture and storage: extending life cycle analysis indices for material accounting Resour. Conserv. Recy. 100 49-57
26. Dones R 2007 Nuclear Energy-Ecoinvent Report No. 6-VII (Villingen: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories)
27. Singh B, Guest G, Bright R M and Strømman A H 2014 Life cycle assessment of electric and fuel cell vehicle transport based on forest biomass J. Ind. Ecol. 18 176-86
28. Njakou Djomo S, Ac A, Zenone T, De Groote T, Bergante S, Facciotto G, Sixto H, Ciria Ciria P, Weger J and Ceulemans R 2015 Energy performances of intensive and extensive short rotation cropping systems for woody biomass production in the EU Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 41 845-54
29. Frischknecht R and Jungbluth N 2007 Ecoinvent 2 (Dübendorf: Swiss centre for Life Cycle Inventories)
30. International Energy Agency 2012 Technology Roadmap Bioenergy for Heat and Power (Paris: IEA Publications)
31. Rose S K, Kriegler E, Bibas R, Calvin K, Popp A, van Vuuren D P and Weyant J 2014 Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management Clim. Change 123 477-93
32. van Vuuren D P, Bellevrat E, Kitous A and Isaac M 2010 Bio-energy use and low stabilization scenarios Energy J. 31 193-221
33. Njakou Djomo S et al 2013 Energy and climate benefits of bioelectricity from low-input short rotation woody crops on agricultural land over a two-year rotation Appl. Energ. 111 862-70
34. IPCC 2006 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Chapter 11: N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application
35. Faist Emmenegger M, Reinhard J and Zah R 2009 Sustainability quick check for biofuels-intermediate background report
36. Nemecek T and Kägi T 2007 Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems (Dübendorf: Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories)
37. Popp A et al 2013 Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options Clim. Change 123 495-509
38. Kahneman D 2011 Thinking Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux)
39. Cartelle Barros J J, Lara Coira M, de la Cruz López M P and del Caño Gochi A 2015 Assessing the global sustainability of different electricity generation systems Energy 89 473-89
40. Hertwich E G, Hammitt J K and Pease W S A 2000 Theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making J. Ind. Ecol. 4 13-28
41. Curran M, De Baan L, De Schryver A M, Van Zelm R, Hellweg S, Koellner T, Sonnemann G and Huijbregts M A J 2011 Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 70-9
42. Hofstetter P 1998 Perspectives in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A Structured Approach to Combine Models of the Technosphere, Ecosphere and Valuesphere (Boston, MA: Kluwer)
43. Treyer K, Bauer C and Simons A 2014 Human health impacts in the life cycle of future European electricity generation Energy Pol. 74 (Supplement 1) S31-S44
44. van de Meent D and Huijbregts M A J 2005 Calculating life-cycle assessment effect factors from potentially affected fraction-based ecotoxicological response functions Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24 1573-8
45. Arvesen A and Hertwich E G 2011 Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: a scenario-based life cycle assessment Environ. Res. Lett. 6 045102
46. International Energy Agency 2015 Energy Technology Perspectives 2015-Mobilising Innovation to Accelerate Climate Action (Paris: IEA Publications)
47. Humpenöder F et al 2015 Land-use and carbon cycle responses to moderate climate change: implications for land-based mitigation? Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 6731-9
48. Kraxner F et al 2013 Global bioenergy scenarios-Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs Biomass Bioenergy 57 86-96
49. Bouwman A F, Kram T and Goldewijk K K 2006 Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4 (The Netherlands: Bilthoven)
50. Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, Leimbach M, Knopf B, Beringer T, Bauer N and Bodirsky B 2011 On sustainability of bioenergy production: Integrating co-emissions from agricultural intensification Biomass Bioenergy 35 4770-80
51. Klein D et al 2014 The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMINDMAgPIE Clim. Change 123 705-18
52. Cherubini F, Peters G P, Berntsen T, Strømman A H and Hertwich E 2011 CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming GCB Bioenergy 3 413-26
53. Silver S R, Bertke S J, Hines C J, Alavanja M C R, Hoppin J A, Lubin J H, Rusiecki J A, Sandler D P and Beane Freeman L E 2015 Cancer incidence and metolachlor use in the agricultural health study: an update Int. J. Cancer 137 2630-43
54. Lin Y.-J, Karuppiah M, Shaw A and Gupta G 1999 Effect of simulated sunlight on atrazine and metolachlor toxicity of surface waters Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 43 35-7
55. Ebenezer V and Ki J-S 2013 Quantification of toxic effects of the herbicide metolachlor on marine microalgae Ditylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyceae), Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae), and Tetraselmis suecica (Chlorophyceae) J. Microbio. 51 136-9
56. Coquillé N, Jan G, Moreira A and Morin S 2015 Use of diatom motility features as endpoints of metolachlor toxicity Aquat. Toxicol. 158 202-10
57. Stepic S, Hackenberger B K, Velki M, Hackenberger D K and Loncaric Z 2013 Potentiation effect of metolachlor on toxicity of organochlorine and organophosphate insecticides in earthworm eisenia andrei B. Environ. Contam. Tox. 91 55-61
58. Milà i Canals L and de Baan L 2015 Land use Life Cycle Impact Assessment ed Z M Hauschild and A J M Huijbregts (Dordrecht: Springer) pp 197-222
59. Huijbregts M A J et al 2014 LC-IMPACT 2015-A spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment approach (First batch released)
60. Mooney H A et al 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Washington, DC: Island Press) p 137
61. Curran M, Maia de Souza D, Antón A, Teixeira R F M, Michelsen O, Vidal-Legaz B, Sala S and Milà i Canals L 2016 How well does LCA model land use impacts on biodiversity?-A comparison with approaches from ecology and conservation Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 2782-95
62. Milà I Canals L, Antón A, Bauer C, de Camillis C, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Grant T, Michelsen O, Stevenson M Land Use related impacts on biodiversity Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators-Volume 1. Publication of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative ed R Frischknecht and O Jolliet (Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme)
63. Verones F et al 2016 LC-IMPACT Version 0.5-A spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment approach (www. lc-impact.eu/) (Accessed: 19 July 2016)
64. Verones F, Huijbregts M A J, Chaudhary A, de Baan L, Koellner T and Hellweg S 2015 Harmonizing the assessment of biodiversity effects from land and water use within LCA Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 3584-92
65. Ramírez A R et al 2015 Chapter 3. Fossil fuels and carbon dioxide capture and storage Environmental Assessment of Low-GHG Electricity Supply Technologies: IRP Report ed E G Hertwich, T Gibon, S Suh, J Aloisi de Larderel and I R Panel (Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme) p 145
66. Singh B, Strømman A H and Hertwich E G 2011 Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 5 911-21
67. Corsten M, Ramírez A, Shen L, Koornneef J, Faaij A 2013 Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains-Lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 13 59-71
68. Fuss S et al 2014 Betting on negative emissions Nature Clim. Change 4 850-3