Preprints and cardiovascular science prescient or premature?

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2017, Pages

  Nallamothu, Brahmajee K ^a   Hill, Joseph A ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

information dissemination; peer review; reproducibility of results

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; BIOMEDICINE; CARDIOLOGY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEER REVIEW; PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RELIABILITY; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; INTERNET; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLISHING;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PREPRINTS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85032218762     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000033     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Bourne PE, Polka JK, Vale RD, Kiley R. Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473.
2. Powell K. Does it take too long to publish research? Nature. 2016;530:148-151. doi: 10.1038/530148a.
3. Lauer MS, Krumholz HM, Topol EJ. Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? Lancet. 2015;386:2447-2449. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01177-0.
4. Jacobsmeyer B. Preprint policies sow confusion. APS News. November 2012. Available at: https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201211/preprint.cfm. Accessed August 17, 2017.
5. Harmon A. Handful of biologists went rogue and published directly to Internet. New York Times. March 15, 2016. Available at: https://www. nytimes.com/2016/03/16/science/asap-bio-biologists-published-To-Theinternet. html. Accessed August 17, 2017.