Consideration of Landsat-8 Spectral Band Combination in Typical Mediterranean Forest Classification in Halkidiki, Greece

Open Geosciences

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 468-479

  Elhag, Mohamed ^a  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Accuracy Assessment; Image Classification; Mediterranean Forest; Remote Sensing Data; Spectral band Combination

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; REMOTE SENSING;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COVER TYPES; MEDITERRANEAN FOREST; OVERALL ACCURACIES; REMOTE SENSING DATA; SATELLITE DATA; SPECTRAL BAND; SPECTRAL INFORMATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LANDSAT; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS;

CENTRAL MACEDONIA; CHALKIDIKI PENINSULA; GREECE;

EID: 85032198479     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23915447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/geo-2017-0036     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Nelson, R.F., R. Latty, and G. Mott, Classifying northern forests using Thematic Mapper simulator data. 1984.
2. Yuan, F., et al., Multi-level land cover mapping of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area with multi-seasonal Landsat TM/ETM+ data. Geocarto International, 2005. 20(2): p. 5-13.
3. Tou, J. and R. Gonzales, Pattern Recognition Principles. Addison-Weley. Reading, MA, 1974. 377.
4. Spanner, M.A., J.A. Brass, and D.L. Peterson, Feature selection and information content of thematic mapper simulator data for a forested environment. 1983.
5. Clinton, N., et al., Accuracy assessment measures for objectbased image segmentation goodness. Photogrammetric Engineering and remote sensing, 2010. 76(3): p. 289-299.
6. Rogan, J., et al., Land-cover change monitoring with classification trees using Landsat TM and ancillary data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2003. 69(7): p. 793-804.
7. Elhag, M., A. Psilovikos, and M. Sakellariou, Detection of land cover changes for water recourses management using remote sensing data over the Nile Delta Region. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013. 15(5): p. 1189-1204.
8. Friedl, M.A., et al., MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote sensing of Environment, 2010. 114(1): p. 168-182.
9. Ghimire, B., J. Rogan, and J. Miller, Contextual land-cover classification: incorporating spatial dependence in land-cover classification models using random forests and the Getis statistic. Remote Sensing Letters, 2010. 1(1): p. 45-54.
10. Congalton, R.G. and K. Green, Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. 2008: CRC press.
11. Townshend, J.R., et al., Global characterization and monitoring of forest cover using Landsat data: opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2012. 5(5): p. 373-397.
12. Richards, J.A. and J. Richards, Remote sensing digital image analysis. Vol. 3. 1999: Springer.
13. Gislason, P.O., J.A. Benediktsson, and J.R. Sveinsson, Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006. 27(4): p. 294-300.
14. Betts, R.A., et al., Biogeophysical effects of land use on climate: Model simulations of radiative forcing and large-scale temperature change. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2007. 142(2): p. 216-233.
15. Chapman, D.S., et al., Random Forest characterization of upland vegetation and management burning from aerial imagery. Journal of Biogeography, 2010. 37(1): p. 37-46.
16. Hansen, M.C., et al., High-resolution global maps of 21stcentury forest cover change. science, 2013. 342(6160): p. 850-853.
17. Gong, P., et al., Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013. 34(7): p. 2607-2654.
18. Lunetta, R.S. and M.E. Balogh, Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1999. 65(11): p. 1303-1310.
19. Li, C., et al., Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sensing, 2014. 6(2): p. 964-983.
20. Davis, S.M., et al., Remote sensing: the quantitative approach. New York, McGraw-Hill International Book Co., 1978. 405 p., 1978. 1.
21. Manolakis, D. and G. Shaw, Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE signal processing magazine, 2002. 19(1): p. 29-43.
22. Mallinis, G., et al., Forest parameters estimation in a European Mediterranean landscape using remotely sensed data. Forest Science, 2004. 50(4): p. 450-460.
23. Gausman, H., et al., Reflectance discrimination of cotton and corn at four growth stages. Agronomy Journal, 1973. 65(2): p. 194-198.
24. Lathrop, R., T.M. Lillesand, and B.S. Yandell, An evaluation of ThematicMapper data for forest covermapping in northernWisconsin. Proc. 11th Pecora Sym., Sioux Falls, SD, 1987: p. 386-393.
25. Elhag, M., Evaluation of different soil salinity mapping using remote sensing techniques in arid ecosystems, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Sensors, 2016. 2016.
26. Murtha, P. and E.Watson.Mapping of forest clear-cutting, south Vancouver Island, from Landsat imagery. in Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, 3 rd, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 1976.
27. Coggeshall, M.E. and R.M. Hoffer, Basic forest cover mapping using digitized remote sensor data and automated data processing techniques. 1973.
28. Duda, R.O., P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork, Pattern classification. Vol. 2. 1973: Wiley New York.
29. Briem, G.J., J.A. Benediktsson, and J.R. Sveinsson,Multiple classifiers applied to multisource remote sensing data. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2002. 40(10): p. 2291-2299.
30. Lippitt, C.D., et al., Mapping Selective Logging in Mixed Deciduous Forest. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 2008. 74(10): p. 1201-1211.
31. Franklin, S. and M.Wulder, Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas. Progress in Physical Geography, 2002. 26(2): p. 173-205.
32. Bonan, G.B., Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. science, 2008. 320(5882): p. 1444-1449.
33. Steele, B.M., Combining multiple classifiers: An application using spatial and remotely sensed information for land cover type mapping. Remote sensing of environment, 2000. 74(3): p. 545-556.
34. Rogan, J., et al., Mapping land-cover modifications over large areas: A comparison of machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008. 112(5): p. 2272-2283.
35. Huang, H., et al., Reduction of atmospheric and topographic effect on Landsat TM data for forest classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2008. 29(19): p. 5623-5642.
36. Coppin, P.R. and M.E. Bauer, Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote sensing reviews, 1996. 13(3-4): p. 207-234.
37. Hopkins, P.F., A.L. Maclean, and T.M. Lillesand, Assessment of Thematic Mapper imagery for forestry applications under Lake States conditions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1988. 54(1): p. 61-68.
38. Bonazountas, M., et al., A decision support system for managing forest fire casualties. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007. 84(4): p. 412-418.
39. Chavez Jr, P.S., G.L. Berlin, and L.B. Sowers, Statistical Method for Selecting Landsat MSS. Journal of applied photographic engineering, 1982. 8(1): p. 23-30.
40. DeFries, R. and J.C.-W. Chan, Multiple criteria for evaluating machine learning algorithms for land cover classification from satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000. 74(3): p. 503-515.
41. Cutler, D.R., et al., Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology, 2007. 88(11): p. 2783-2792.
42. Elhag, M. and J.A. Bahrawi, Conservational use of remote sensing techniques for a novel rainwater harvesting in arid environment. Environmental earth sciences, 2014. 72(12): p. 4995-5005.
43. Sesnie, S.E., et al., Integrating Landsat TM and SRTM-DEM derived variables with decision trees for habitat classification and change detection in complex neotropical environments. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008. 112(5): p. 2145-2159.
44. Foody, G.M., Sample size determination for image classification accuracy assessment and comparison. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009. 30(20): p. 5273-5291.
45. Petropoulos, G., et al., A global Bayesian sensitivity analysis of the 1d SimSphere soil-vegetation-atmospheric transfer (SVAT) model using Gaussian model emulation. Ecological Modelling, 2009. 220(19): p. 2427-2440.
46. Elhag, M., Inconsistencies of SEBS Model Output Based on the Model Inputs: Global Sensitivity Contemplations. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2016. 44(3): p. 435-442.
47. Psilovikos, A. and M. Elhag, Forecasting of remotely sensed daily evapotranspiration data over Nile Delta region, Egypt.Water Resources Management, 2013. 27(12): p. 4115-4130.
48. Elhag, M. and J.A. Bahrawi, Soil salinity mapping and hydrological drought indices assessment in arid environments based on remote sensing techniques. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 2017. 6(1): p. 149.
49. Congalton, R.G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote sensing of environment, 1991. 37(1): p. 35-46.
50. Elhag, M. and J.A. Bahrawi, Realization of daily evapotranspiration in arid ecosystems based on remote sensing techniques. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 2017. 6(1): p. 141.