Serial metonymy: A study of reference-based polysemisation

Journal of Historical Pragmatics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 245-272

  Nerlich, Brigitte ^a   Clarke, David D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032068438     PISSN: 15665852     EISSN: 15699854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.2.2.04ner     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barcelona, Antonio. 1997. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics. Atlantis 19(1), 21-48.
2. Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). 2000. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Blank, Andreas. 1999. Co-presence and succession. A cognitive typology of metonymy. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:169-192.
4. Bredin, Hugh. 1984. Metonymy. Poetics Today 5, 45-58.
5. Bryson, Bill. 1990. Mother Tongue. The English Language. London: Penguin Books.
6. Burkhardt, Armin. 1996. Zwischen Poesie und Ökonomie. Die Metonymie als semantisches Prinzip. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 24, 175-194.
7. Burling, Robbins. 1999. The cognitive prerequisites for language. Target article. PSYCO-LOQUY 10(32). http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/psyc-bin/newspy?10.032 (accessed 14 June, 2000).
8. Chamizo Dominguez, Pedro J., and Brigitte Nerlich (in preparation). Spanish lecturers do not teach fastidious topics: Metaphor, metonymy and false friends. Paper accepted for the Fourth International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor, RAAM IV, 5-7 April 2001, Tunis.
9. Darmesteter, Arsène. 1887. La vie des mots étudiée dans leurs significations. Paris: Delagrave.
10. Esnault, Gaston. 1925. L’imagination populaire: Métaphores occidentales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
11. Fass, Dan. 1988. Metonymy and metaphor. What’s the difference. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-88), 177-181.
12. Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. Feyaerts, Kurt. 1997. Die Bedeutung der Metonymie als konzeptuellen Strukturprinzips. Eine kognitiv-semantische Analyse deutscher Dummheitsausdrücke. Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
14. Jakobson, Roman. 1983[1956]. Two aspects oflanguage and two types ofaphasic disturbances. In: Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudi (eds.). Language in Literature. Cambridge, Mass.; London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 95-120.
15. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Koch, Peter. 1999. Frame and contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:139-168.
17. Kövesces, Zoltán, and Günter Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 37-77.
18. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
19. Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Langacker, Ronald W. 1993. Reference-point construction. Cognitive Linguistics 4, 1-38.
21. Nerlich, Brigitte. 1989. Elements for an integral theory of language change. Journal of Literary Semantics 18.3, 163-186.
22. Nerlich, Brigitte, and David D. Clarke. 1992. Semantic change: Case studies based on traditional and cognitive semantics. Journal of Literary Semantics 21.3, 204-225.
23. Nerlich, Brigitte, Zazie Todd, and David D. Clarke. 1999. ‘Mummy, I like being a sandwich’: Metonymy in language acquisition. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:361-384.
24. Norrick, Neal R. 1981. Semiotic Principles in Semantic Theory. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
25. Oxford English Dictionary. 1989. Second edition, prepared by J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Günter Radden (eds.). 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:17-60.
28. Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor - a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: Anthony Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284-324.
29. Rhetorica adHerennium. Anonymous. Incerti auctoris De ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium libri IV. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894 (reprint Hildesheim: Olms 1966).
30. Room, Adrian. 1986. Dictionary of Changes in Meaning. London, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Rothwell, William. 1960. Mediaeval French Bureau. Medium Aevum 29, 102-114.
32. Roudet, Léonce. 1921. Sur la classification psychologique des changements sémantiques. Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 18, 676-692.
33. Seto, Ken-ichi. 1999. Distinguishing metonymy from syncedoche. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:91-120.
34. Stern, Gustav. 1931. Meaning and Change of Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965.
35. Stöcklein, Johann. 1898. Bedeutungswandel der Wörter. München: J. Lindauersche Buchhandlung.
36. The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories. 1991. Springfield, Mass.: Merriam-Webster Inc., Publishers.
37. The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. 1993. Edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Todd, Zazie, and David D. Clarke. 1999. When is a dead rainbow not like a dead rainbow? A context-sensitive method for investigating differences between metaphor and simile. In: Lynne Cameron and Graham Low (eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249-268.
39. Ullmann, Stephen 1962. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Warren, Beatrice. 1992. Sense Developments. A Contrastive Study of the Development of Slang Senses and Novel Standard Senses in English. Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
41. Warren, Beatrice. 1999. Aspects of referential metonymy. In: Panther and Radden (eds.) 1999:121-138.
42. Warren, Beatrice. n.d. Producing and interpreting metaphor and metonymy: An alternative account of the interpretation of metonymy and metaphor. Unpublished ms.