A dynamic objective-subjective structure for forest management focusing on environmental issues

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 14, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 55-65

  Henig, M I ^a   Weintraub, A ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Decision making methodology; Multiple criteria; Natural resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031995387     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mcda.400     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bettinger, P., Chung, W., 2004. The key literature of, and trends in, forest-level management planning in North America, 1950-2001. International Forestry Review 6(1): 40-50.
2. Caro, F., Andalaft, R., Silva, X., Weintraub, A., Sapunar, P., Cabello, M., 2003. Evaluating the economic cost of environmental measures in plantation harvesting through the use of mathematical models. Production and Operations Management 12: 290-306.
3. Charter of the Global Greens, Canberra. 2001. Available at: www.global.greens.org.au/charter.htm
4. Corner, J., Buchanan, J., Henig, MI., 2001. Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 10: 129-141.
5. Diaz-Balterio, L., Romero, C., 2007. Multiple criteria decision making in forest planning: recent results and current challenges. In Handbook of Operations Research in Natural Resources, Weintraub A, Bjorndal T, Epstein R, Romero C (eds), Springer; pp. 473-488.
6. Henig, MI., Buchanan, J., 1996. Solving MCDM problems: process concepts. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 5: 3-12.
7. Henig, MI., Katz, H., 1996. R&D project selection: a decision process approach. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 5: 169-177.
8. Kangas, J., Kangas, A., 2002. Multiple criteria support methods in forest management. An overview and comparative analyses. In Multi-objective Forest Planning, Pukkala T (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
9. Kangas, J., Kangas, A., 2005. Multiple criteria decision support in forest management-the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecology and Management 207(1-2): 133-143.
10. Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., Pykalainen, J., 2001. MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 10: 257-271.
11. Keeney, RL., 1992. Value Focused Thinking. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
12. Keeney, RL., Gregory, RS., 2005. Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Operations Research 53(1): 1-11.
13. Keisler, JM., 2002. Attribute-based differentiation of alternatives. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 11: 315-326.
14. Martell, DL., Gunn, A., Weintraub, A., 1998. Forest management challenges for operational researchers. European Journal of Operational Research 104: 1-17.
15. Pukkala, T., 2002a. Introduction to multi-objective forest planning. In Multi-objective Forest Planning, Pukkala T (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
16. Pukkala T. (ed.). 2002b. Multi-objective Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
17. Roy, B., 1996. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
18. Salminen, P., Hokkanen, J., Lahdelma, R., 1998. Comparing multi criteria methods in the context of environmental problems. European Journal of Operational Research 104: 485-496.
19. Weintraub, A., Jones, G., Magendzo, A., Meacham, M., Kirby, MA., 1994. Heuristic system to solve mixed-integer forest planning models. Operations Research 42(6): 1010-1024.