Enhanced English universal dependencies: An improved representation for natural language understanding tasks

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 2371-2378

  Schuster, Sebastian ^a   Manning, Christopher D ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Semantic representation; Treebank conversion; Universal dependencies

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SURFACE STRUCTURE; SYNTACTICS;

DEPENDENCY GRAPHS; DEPENDENCY TREES; LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE; NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; STANFORD; TREEBANKS; UNIVERSAL DEPENDENCIES;

TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 85031920558     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Airola, A., Pyysalo, S., Björne, J., Pahikkala, T., Ginter, F., and Salakoski, T. (2008). All-paths graph kernel for protein-protein interaction extraction with evaluation of cross-corpus learning. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 11):S2.
2. Angeli, G., Premkumar, M. J., and Manning, C. D. (2015). Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, ACL.
3. Banarescu, L., Bonial, C., Cai, S., Georgescu, M., Griffitt, K., Hermjakob, U., Knight, K., Koehn, P., Palmer, M., and Schneider, N. (2013). meaning representation for sembanking. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse.
4. Barwise, J. and Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(2):159-219.
5. Chambers, N., Cer, D., Grenager, T., Hall, D., Kiddon, C., MacCartney, B., de Marneffe, M.-C., Ramage D., Yeh, E., and Manning, C. D. (2007). Learning alignments and leveraging natural logic. In ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing.
6. Chen, D. and Manning, C. D. (2014). A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
7. Choi, J. D. and Palmer, M. (2012). Guidelines for the Clear style constituent to dependency conversion. Technical report, Technical Report 01-12, University of Colorado at Boulder.
8. Collins, M. (1999). Head-driven statistical models for natural language processing. Ph. D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
9. de Marneffe, M.-C., MacCartney, B., and Manning, C. D. (2006). Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2006).
10. de Marneffe, M.-C., Dozat, T., Silveira, N., Haverinen, K., Ginter, F., Nivre, J., and Manning, C. D. (2014). Universal Stanford Dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2014).
11. Galanis, D. and Androutsopoulos, I. (2010). An extractive supervised two-stage method for sentence compression. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL).
12. Genzel, D. (2010). Automatically learning source-side reordering rules for large scale machine translation. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING).
13. Jespersen, O. (1954). A modern English grammar, volume 3. George Allen & Unwin Limited.
14. Keenan, E. L. and Stavi, J. (1986). A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(3):253-326.
15. Levy, R. and Galen, A. (2006). Tregex and Tsurgeon: tools for querying and manipulating tree data structures. In 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2006).
16. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19 (2).
17. Mausam Schmitz, M., Bart, R., Soderland, S., and Etzioni, O. (2012). Open language learning for information extraction. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CONLL).
18. McDonald, R., Nivre, J., Quirmbach-Brundage, Y., Goldberg, Y., Das, D., Ganchev, K., Hall, K., Petrov, S., Zhang, H., Täckström, O., Bedini, C., Bertomeu Castelló, N., and Lee, J. (2013). Universal dependency annotation for multilingual parsing. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).
19. Nivre, J., Agić, Ž., Aranzabe, M. J., Atutxa, A., Bosco, C., Choi, J., de Marneffe, M.-C., Dozat, T., Farkas, R., Foster, J., Ginter, F., Goenaga, I., Gojenola, K., Goldberg, Y., Hajič, J., Johannsen, A. T., Kanerva, J., Kuokkala, J., Laippala, V., Lenci, A., Lindén, K., Ljubešić, N., Lynn, T., Manning, C. D., Martínez, H. A., McDonald, R., Missilä, A., Montemagni, S., Nurmi, H., Osenova, P., Petrov, S., Piitulainen, J., Plank, B., Prokopidis, P., Pyysalo, S., Seeker, W., Seraji, M., Silveira, N., Simi, M., Simov, K., Smith, A., Tsarfaty, R., Vincze, V., and Zeman, D. (2015). Universal Dependencies 1.1. http://hdl.handle.net/11234/LRT-1478.
20. Nivre, J., de Marneffe, M.-C., Ginter, F., Goldberg, Y., Hajič, J., Manning, C. D., McDonald, R., Petrov, S., Pyysalo, S., Silveira, N., Tsarfaty, R., and Zeman, D. (2016). Universal dependencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2016).
21. Nyblom, J., Kohonen, S., Haverinen, K., Salakoski, T., and Ginter, F. (2013). Predicting conjunct propagation and other extended Stanford Dependencies. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (DepLing 2013).
22. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., and Kingsbury, P. (2005). The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71-106.
23. Poon, H. and Domingos, P. (2009). Unsupervised semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
24. Schuster, S., Krishna, R., Chang, A., Fei-Fei, L., and Manning, C. D. (2015). Generating semantically precise scene graphs from textual descriptions for improved image retrieval. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Vision and Language (VL15).
25. Shieber, S. M. (1984). The design of a computer language for linguistic information. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
26. Simone, R. and Masini, F. (2014). On light nouns. Word Classes: Nature, typology and representations, 332:51.
27. Tsarfaty, R. (2013). A unified morpho-syntactic scheme of Stanford Dependencies. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).