EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ISSUES FOR SIMULTANEOUS FITTING OF FORWARD AND INVERSE METAMODELS

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2000, Pages 773-780

  Barton, Russell R ^a   Meckesheimer, Martin ^a   Simpson, Timothy W ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Design of Experiments; Inverse Design; Metamodels; Regression

Indexed keywords

DESIGN ISSUES; DESIGN PARAMETERS; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING SIMULATION; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; INVERSE DESIGNS; META MODEL; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; SIMULTANEOUS FITTING;

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 85031912700     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC2000/DAC-14282     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Atkinson, A.C. and Donev, A.N. (1992). Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Barton, R.R. (1992). Metamodels for simulation input-output relations. Proceedings of the 1992 Winter Simulation Conference (J. J. Swain, D. Goldsman, R. C. Crain, and J. R. Wilson, Eds.) 289-299.
3. Barton. R. R. (1998). Simulation Metamodels. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference (D. J. Medeiros, E. F. Watson, J. S. Carson and M. S. Manivannan, Eds.), Piscataway: IEEE, 167-174.
4. Currin, C., Mitchell, T.J., Morris, M., and Ylvisaker, D. (1991). Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with an application to the design and analysis of computer experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 953-963.
5. Dulikravich, G D. and Martin, T. J. (1996). Inverse shape and boundary condition problems and optimization in heat conduction. Chapter 10 in Advances in Numerical Heat Transfer, Vol. 1 (Editors: W. J. Minkowycz and E. M. Sparrow). New York: Taylor and Francis.
6. Fang, K.-T. and Wang, Y. (1994). Number Theoretic Methods in Statistics. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 51, London: Chapman and Hall.
7. Fedorov, V.V. and Hackl, P. (1997). Model-Oriented Design of Experiments. Lecture Notes in Statistics Series No. 125, New York: Springer-Verlag.
8. Frank, C. R. Jr. (1971). Statistics and Econometrics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9. Khuri, A. I. and Cornell, J. A. (1987). Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses. Statistics: textbooks and monographs series, New York: Marcel Dekker.
10. Lu, S. C.-Y., Bukkapatnam, S. T. S., Ge, P., and Wang, N. (1999). Backward mapping methodology for design synthesis. Proceedings of DETC99, 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 12-15, 1999, DETC99/DTM-8766.
11. McKay, M. D., Conover, W. J., and Beckman, R. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21, 239-245.
12. Owen, A. (1992). Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration, and visualization. Statistica Sinica 2, 439-452.
13. Runge, C. (1901). Uber die darstellung willkurlicher funtionen und die interpolation zwischen aquidistanten ordinaten. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 46, 224-243.
14. Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J. and Wynn, E. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science 4,409-435.
15. Simpson, T. W., Allen, J. K. and Mistree, F. (1998a). Spatial Correlation Metamodels for Global Approximation in Structural Design Optimization, Advances in Design Automation, Atlanta, GA, September 13-16, ASME, Paper No. DETC98/DAC-5613.
16. Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J. and Mistree, F. (1998b). Comparison of Response Surface and Kriging Models for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, St. Louis, MO, September 2-4, AIAA, 1 (381-391) AIAA-98-4755.
17. Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P. N. and Allen, J. K. (1997). On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments, Design Theory and Methodology - DTM'97, Sacramento, CA, September 14-17, ASME, Paper No. DETC97/DTM-3881.