Assessment of ecosystem productivity damage due to land use

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 621, Issue , 2018, Pages 1320-1329

  Kaenchan, Piyanon ^a,b   Guinée, Jeroen ^c   Gheewala, Shabbir H ^a,b  

^a KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

^b Centre of Excellence on Energy Technology and Environment   (Thailand)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Impact assessment; Land use; Net primary production; Production function; Valuation

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAMAGE DETECTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE VALUATION;

BIODIESEL PRODUCTION; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; LAND TRANSFORMATION; LAND-USE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION FUNCTION;

LAND USE;

BIODIESEL;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LAND USE PLANNING; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION COST; VALUATION;

ARTICLE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRY WEIGHT; ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LAND USE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIMARY PRODUCTION (BIOMASS); PRIORITY JOURNAL; THAILAND;

THAILAND;

EID: 85031820195     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.096     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Akesamatramate, T., Nilnon, C., Chantraniyom, T., Thongkam, P., See-Sanong, S., The Road of Success in Oil Palm Industry [in Thai]. 2005, Oil Palm Research and Development Center, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.
2. BOT (National Statistical Office), Work situation of Thai population surveys. (Available at) https://www.bot.or.th/Thai/Statistics/EconomicAndFinancial/RealSector/Pages/Index.aspx, 2016.
3. Callesen, I., Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment – inventory objects or impact categories?. Ecosyst. Serv. 22 (2016), 94–103.
4. DAAC (Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics), Net primary production methods. (Available at) https://daac.ornl.gov/NPP/html_docs/npp_est.html, 2016.
5. de Baan, L., Alkemade, R., Koellner, T., Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (2013), 1216–1230.
6. de Baan, L., Emanuelsson, A., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Kindermann, G., Koellner, T., Maia de Souza, D., Muchada, P.A.N., Muñoz, P., Núñez, M., Obersteiner, M., Rosenbaum, R.K., Schmid, E., van der Velde, M., van Zelm, R., Ziegler, F., Development and application of environmental life cycle impact assessment: methods for improved sustainability. Characterisation of Technologies (LC-IMPACT): D1.6 Land Use Impact, 2013 (Available at) http://www.lc-impact.eu/downloads/documents/D1_6_Land_use_impacts.pdf.
7. DEDE (Thailand Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency), 10 – Year Alternative Energy Development Plan: AEDP 2015–2036. 2015.
8. DOA (Department of Agriculture), Oil Palm Database. 2011, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Thailand (Available at) http://www.doa.go.th/palm/linkTechnical/oilpalm.html.
9. DOA (Department of Agriculture), Plant varieties database. (Available at) http://www.doa.go.th/cv/, 2016.
10. Erb, K.-H., Gaube, V., Krausmann, F., Plutzar, C., Bondeau, A., Haberl, H., A comprehensive global 5min resolution land-use dataset for the year 2000 consistent with national census data. J. Land Use Sci. 2:3 (2007), 191–224.
11. European Commission, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators. 2010, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
12. Finnveden, G., Moberg, A., Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 13 (2005), 1165–1173.
13. Gabel, V.M., Meier, M.S., Köpke, U., Stolze, M., The challenges of including impacts on biodiversity in agricultural life cycle assessments. J. Environ. Manag. 181 (2016), 249–260.
14. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., Van Zelm, R., ReCiPe 2008. Report I: Characterization, First edition, 2009.
15. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J., Van Zelm, R., ReCiPe 2008 version 1.08. (Available at) http://www.lcia-recipe.net/file-cabinet, 2013.
16. Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Gaube, V., Bondeau, A., Plutzar, C., Gingrich, S., Lucht, W., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in Earth's terrestrial ecosystems. PNAS 104:31 (2007), 12942–12947.
17. Haberl, H., Steinberger, J.K., Plutzar, C., Erb, K.-H., Gaube, V., Gingrich, S., Krausmann, F., Natural and socioeconomic determinants of the embodied human appropriation of net primary production and its relation to other resource use indicators. Ecol. Indic. 23 (2012), 222–231.
18. Höjer, M., Sofia, A., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G., Hjelm, O., Hochschorner, E., Nilsson, M., Palm, V., Scenarios in selected tools for environmental systems analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 16 (2008), 1958–1970.
19. IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Penman, J., Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Kruger, D., Pipatti, R., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., Wagner, F., (eds.) Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry: Section 3.2 Forest Land, 2003, The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC, Japan.
20. Itsubo, N., Inaba, A., LIME2: Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Based on Endpoint Modelling; Summary. JLCA New English edition, 2012, Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan (Mar. 2012: No.12).
21. Itsubo, N., Inaba, A., LIME2: Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Based on Endpoint Modelling Chapter 2; Characterization and Damage Evaluation Models. JLCA New English edition, 2012, Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan (Oct. 2012: No.15).
22. Itsubo, N., Inaba, A., LIME2: Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method Based on Endpoint Modeling Chapter 2; Characterization and Damage Evaluation Models. JLCA New English edition, 2014, Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan (Nov. 2014: No.18).
23. Kaenchan, P., Gheewala, S.H., Cost – benefit of water resource use in biofuel feedstock production. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 1192–1199.
24. Kaenchan, P., Gheewala, S.H., Budget constraint and the valuation of environmental impacts in Thailand. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22 (2017), 1678–1691.
25. Margni, M., Gloria, T., Bare, J., Seppälä J., Steen, B., Struijs, J., Toffoletto, L., Jolliet, O., Guidance on How to Move From Current Practice to Recommended Practice in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. 2008, UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris.
26. NESDB (Office of National Economic and Social Development Board), National accounts of Thailand 2014. (Available at) http://www.nesdb.go.th/main.php?filename=ni_page, 2014.
27. NESDB (Office of National Economic and Social Development Board), Capital stock of Thailand 2014. (Available at) http://www.nesdb.go.th/main.php?filename=capital_stock, 2014.
28. OAE (Office of Agricultural Economics), Agricultural statistics of Thailand. (Available at) http://www.oae.go.th/main.php?filename=journal_all, 2015.
29. Onofri, L., Lange, G.M., Portela, R., Nunes, P.A.L.D., Valuing ecosystem services for improved national accounting: a pilot study from Madagascar. Ecosyst. Serv. 23 (2017), 116–126.
30. Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Verma, M., TEEB chapter 5: the economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. Kumar, P., (eds.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations, 2010, Earthscan, London and Washington.
31. Pei, F., Li, X., Liu, X., Lao, C., Xia, G., Exploring the response of net primary productivity variations to urban expansion and climate change: a scenario analysis for Guangdong Province in China. J. Environ. Manag. 150 (2015), 92–102.
32. Petrosillo, I., Semeraro, T., Zaccarelli, N., Aretano, R., Zurlini, G., The possible combined effects of land-use changes and climate conditions on the spatial–temporal patterns of primary production in a natural protected area. Ecol. Indic. 29 (2013), 367–375.
33. Pleanjai, S., Gheewala, S.H., Garivait, S., Environmental evaluation of biodiesel production from palm oil in a life cycle perspective. Asian J. Energy Environ. 8:1,2 (2007), 15–32.
34. Potithep, S., Estimation of Net Primary Production (NPP) Using Remote Sensing and Local Parameters in Thailand. (Unpublished master's thesis), 2003, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
35. Richmond, A., Kaufmann, R.K., Myneni, R.B., Valuing ecosystem services: a shadow price for net primary production. Ecol. Econ. 64 (2007), 454–462.
36. Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., Long-term bioethanol system and its implications on GHG emissions: a case study of Thailand. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011), 4920–4928.
37. Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., Environmental sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand. Energy 43 (2012), 306–313.
38. Silalertruksa, T., Bonnet, S., Gheewala, S.H., Life cycle costing and externalities of palm oil biodiesel in Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 28 (2012), 225–232.
39. Stranddorf, H.K., Hoffmann, L., Schmidt, A., Impact Categories, Normalisation and Weighting in LCA. (Updated on selected EDIP97-data), 2005, Denmark, FORCE Technology.
40. The Botanical Garden Organization, BGO plant databases. (Available at) http://www.qsbg.org/database/plantdb/index.asp, 2013.
41. The World Bank Group, Agricultural, value added (% of GDP). (Available at) http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS, 2016.