ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Valve Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 70, Issue 20, 2017, Pages 2566-2598

  Bonow, Robert O ^a   Brown, Alan S ^a   Gillam, Linda D ^a   Kapadia, Samir R ^a   Kavinsky, Clifford J ^a   Lindman, Brian R ^a   Mack, Michael J ^a   Thourani, Vinod H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

ACC Appropriate Use Criteria; balloon aortic valvuloplasty; severe aortic stenosis; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AORTIC STENOSIS; AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EXERCISE TEST; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL RISK; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; UNITED STATES;

AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BALLOON VALVULOPLASTY; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85031758367     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nishimura, R.A., Otto, C.M., Bonow, R.O., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63 (2014), e57–e185.
2. Nishimura, R.A., Otto, C.M., Bonow, R.O., et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017.
3. Patel, M.R., Spertus, J.A., Brindis, R.G., et al. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005), 1606–1613.
4. Carr, J.J., Hendel, R.C., White, R.D., et al. 2013 appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging: a methodology for the development of joint criteria for the appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American College of Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 61 (2013), 2199–2206.
5. Adams, D.H., Popma, J.J., Reardon, M.J., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 370 (2014), 1790–1798.
6. Herrmann, H.C., Thourani, V.H., Kodali, S.K., et al. One-Year Clinical Outcomes With SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis. Circulation 134 (2016), 130–140.
7. Leon, M.B., Smith, C.R., Mack, M., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363 (2010), 1597–1607.
8. Leon, M.B., Smith, C.R., Mack, M.J., et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med 374 (2016), 1609–1620.
9. Kapadia, S.R., Leon, M.B., Makkar, R.R., et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385 (2015), 2485–2491.
10. Smith, C.R., Leon, M.B., Mack, M.J., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364 (2011), 2187–2198.
11. Fried, L.P., Tangen, C.M., Walston, J., et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56 (2001), M146–M156.
12. Das, P., Rimington, H., Chambers, J., Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 26 (2005), 1309–1313.
13. Lancellotti, P., Karsera, D., Tumminello, G., et al. Determinants of an abnormal response to exercise in patients with asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 9 (2008), 338–343.
14. Magne, J., Lancellotti, P., Pierard, L.A., Exercise testing in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 7 (2014), 188–199.
15. Amato, M.C., Moffa, P.J., Werner, K.E., et al. Treatment decision in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis: role of exercise testing. Heart 86 (2001), 381–386.
16. Lancellotti, P., Lebois, F., Simon, M., et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 112 (2005), I377–I382.
17. Marechaux, S., Hachicha, Z., Bellouin, A., et al. Usefulness of exercise-stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 31 (2010), 1390–1397.
18. Otto, C.M., Burwash, I.G., Legget, M.E., et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95 (1997), 2262–2270.
19. Pellikka, P.A., Sarano, M.E., Nishimura, R.A., et al. Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up. Circulation 111 (2005), 3290–3295.
20. Rosenhek, R., Zilberszac, R., Schemper, M., et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 121 (2010), 151–156.
21. Kapadia, S.R., Goel, S.S., Yuksel, U., et al. Lessons learned from balloon aortic valvuloplasty experience from the pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation era. J Interv Cardiol 23 (2010), 499–508.
22. Tribouilloy, C., Levy, F., Rusinaru, D., et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009), 1865–1873.
23. Mack, M.J., Brennan, J.M., Brindis, R., et al. Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States. JAMA 310 (2013), 2069–2077.
24. Serruys, P.W., Morice, M.C., Kappetein, A.P., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360 (2009), 961–972.
25. Patel, M.R., Calhoon, J.H., Dehmer, G.J., et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 69 (2017), 570–591.
26. Farooq, V., Girasis, C., Magro, M., et al. The coronary artery bypass graft SYNTAX Score: final five-year outcomes from the SYNTAX-LE MANS left main angiographic substudy. EuroIntervention 9 (2013), 1009–1010.
27. Goel, S.S., Ige, M., Tuzcu, E.M., et al. Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease–implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review. J Am Coll Cardiol 62 (2013), 1–10.
28. Goel, S.S., Agarwal, S., Tuzcu, E.M., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation 125 (2012), 1005–1013.
29. Fihn, S.D., Blankenship, J.C., Alexander, K.P., et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), 1929–1949.
30. Hiratzka, L.F., Creager, M.A., Isselbacher, E.M., et al. Surgery for Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves: A Statement of Clarification From the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 724–731.
31. Dvir, D., Webb, J.G., Bleiziffer, S., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA 312 (2014), 162–170.
32. Midha, P.A., Raghav, V., Condado, J.F., et al. How Can We Help a Patient With a Small Failing Bioprosthesis?: An In Vitro Case Study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 (2015), 2026–2033.
33. Dvir, D., Treatment of Small Surgical Valves: Clinical Considerations for Achieving Optimal Results in Valve-in-Valve Procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 8 (2015), 2034–2036.