CLASSIFICATION of AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA USING GEOMETRIC MULTI-SCALE FEATURES and DIFFERENT NEIGHBOURHOOD TYPES

ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue , 2016, Pages 169-176

  Blomley, R ^a   Jutzi, B ^a   Weinmann, M ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ALS; Classification; Features; LiDAR; Multi Scale; Point Cloud

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031507270     PISSN: 21949042     EISSN: 21949050     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-III-3-169-2016     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Belton, D. and Lichti, D. D., 2006. Classification and segmentation of terrestrial laser scanner point clouds using local variance information. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVI-5, pp. 44-49.
2. Blomley, R., Weinmann, M., Leitloff, J. and Jutzi, B., 2014. Shape distribution features for point cloud analysis-A geometric histogram approach on multiple scales. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. II-3, pp. 9-16.
3. Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), pp. 123-140.
4. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), pp. 5-32.
5. Bremer, M., Wichmann, V. and Rutzinger, M., 2013. Eigenvalue and graph-based object extraction from mobile laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. II-5/W2, pp. 55-60.
6. Brodu, N. and Lague, D., 2012. 3D terrestrial lidar data classification of complex natural scenes using a multi-scale dimensionality criterion: applications in geomorphology. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 68, pp. 121-134.
7. Chehata, N., Guo, L. and Mallet, C., 2009. Airborne lidar feature selection for urban classification using random forests. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-3/W8, pp. 207-212.
8. Chen, C., Liaw, A. and Breiman, L., 2004. Using random forest to learn imbalanced data. Technical Report, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
9. Demantké, J., Mallet, C., David, N. and Vallet, B., 2011. Dimensionality based scale selection in 3D lidar point clouds. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, pp. 97-102.
10. Filin, S. and Pfeifer, N., 2005. Neighborhood systems for airborne laser data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71(6), pp. 743-755.
11. Frome, A., Huber, D., Kolluri, R., Bülow, T. and Malik, J., 2004. Recognizing objects in range data using regional point descriptors. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. III, pp. 224-237.
12. Guo, B., Huang, X., Zhang, F. and Sohn, G., 2015. Classification of airborne laser scanning data using JointBoost. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 100, pp. 71-83.
13. Hu, H., Munoz, D., Bagnell, J. A. and Hebert, M., 2013. Efficient 3-D scene analysis from streaming data. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2297-2304.
14. Johnson, A. E. and Hebert, M., 1999. Using spin images for efficient object recognition in cluttered 3D scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(5), pp. 433-449.
15. Khoshelham, K. and Oude Elberink, S. J., 2012. Role of dimensionality reduction in segment-based classification of damaged building roofs in airborne laser scanning data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geographic Object Based Image Analysis, pp. 372-377.
16. Lalonde, J.-F., Unnikrishnan, R., Vandapel, N. and Hebert, M., 2005. Scale selection for classification of point-sampled 3D surfaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 285-292.
17. Lee, I. and Schenk, T., 2002. Perceptual organization of 3D surface points. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXIV-3A, pp. 193-198.
18. Liaw, A. andWiener, M., 2002. Classification and regression by random-Forest. R News, Vol. 2/3, pp. 18-22.
19. Linsen, L. and Prautzsch, H., 2001. Local versus global triangulations. Proceedings of Eurographics, pp. 257-263.
20. Lodha, S. K., Fitzpatrick, D. M. and Helmbold, D. P., 2007. Aerial lidar data classification using AdaBoost. Proceedings of the International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 435-442.
21. Mallet, C., Bretar, F., Roux, M., Soergel, U. and Heipke, C., 2011. Relevance assessment of full-waveform lidar data for urban area classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(6), pp. S71-S84.
22. Mitra, N. J. and Nguyen, A., 2003. Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 322-328.
23. Munoz, D., Bagnell, J. A., Vandapel, N. and Hebert, M., 2009. Contextual classification with functional max-margin Markov networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 975-982.
24. Munoz, D., Vandapel, N. and Hebert, M., 2008. Directional associative Markov network for 3-D point cloud classification. Proceedings of the International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, pp. 63-70.
25. Niemeyer, J., Rottensteiner, F. and Soergel, U., 2012. Conditional random fields for lidar point cloud classification in complex urban areas. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. I-3, pp. 263-268.
26. Niemeyer, J., Rottensteiner, F. and Soergel, U., 2014. Contextual classification of lidar data and building object detection in urban areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, pp. 152-165.
27. Osada, R., Funkhouser, T., Chazelle, B. and Dobkin, D., 2002. Shape distributions. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(4), pp. 807-832.
28. Pauly, M., Keiser, R. and Gross, M., 2003. Multi-scale feature extraction on point-sampled surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum, 22(3), pp. 81-89.
29. Pu, S., Rutzinger, M., Vosselman, G. and Oude Elberink, S., 2011. Recognizing basic structures from mobile laser scanning data for road inventory studies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(6), pp. S28-S39.
30. Rusu, R. B., 2009. Semantic 3D object maps for everyday manipulation in human living environments. PhD thesis, Computer Science department, Technische Universität München, Germany.
31. Rusu, R. B., Marton, Z. C., Blodow, N. and Beetz, M., 2008. Persistent point feature histograms for 3D point clouds. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, pp. 119-128.
32. Schmidt, A., Niemeyer, J., Rottensteiner, F. and Soergel, U., 2014. Contextual classification of full waveform lidar data in theWadden Sea. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(9), pp. 1614-1618.
33. Shapovalov, R. and Velizhev, A., 2011. Cutting-plane training of nonassociative Markov network for 3D point cloud segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission, pp. 1-8.
34. Shapovalov, R., Velizhev, A. and Barinova, O., 2010. Non-associative Markov networks for 3D point cloud classification. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-3A, pp. 103-108.
35. Shapovalov, R., Vetrov, D. and Kohli, P., 2013. Spatial inference machines. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2985-2992.
36. Tombari, F., Salti, S. and Di Stefano, L., 2010. Unique signatures of histograms for local surface description. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. III, pp. 356-369.
37. Velizhev, A., Shapovalov, R. and Schindler, K., 2012. Implicit shape models for object detection in 3D point clouds. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. I-3, pp. 179-184.
38. Vosselman, G., Gorte, B. G. H., Sithole, G. and Rabbani, T., 2004. Recognising structure in laser scanner point clouds. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVI-8/W2, pp. 33-38.
39. Weinmann, M., 2016. Reconstruction and analysis of 3D scenes-From irregularly distributed 3D points to object classes. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
40. Weinmann, M., Jutzi, B. and Mallet, C., 2013. Feature relevance assessment for the semantic interpretation of 3D point cloud data. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. II-5/W2, pp. 313-318.
41. Weinmann, M., Jutzi, B., Hinz, S. and Mallet, C., 2015a. Semantic point cloud interpretation based on optimal neighborhoods, relevant features and efficient classifiers. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 105, pp. 286-304.
42. Weinmann, M., Schmidt, A., Mallet, C., Hinz, S., Rottensteiner, F. and Jutzi, B., 2015b. Contextual classification of point cloud data by exploiting individual 3D neighborhoods. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. II-3/W4, pp. 271-278.
43. Weinmann, M., Urban, S., Hinz, S., Jutzi, B. and Mallet, C., 2015c. Distinctive 2D and 3D features for automated large-scale scene analysis in urban areas. Computers & Graphics, 49, pp. 47-57.
44. West, K. F., Webb, B. N., Lersch, J. R., Pothier, S., Triscari, J. M. and Iverson, A. E., 2004. Context-driven automated target detection in 3-D data. Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 5426, pp. 133-143.
45. Wohlkinger, W. and Vincze, M., 2011. Ensemble of shape functions for 3D object classification. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, pp. 2987-2992.
46. Xiong, X., Munoz, D., Bagnell, J. A. and Hebert, M., 2011. 3-D scene analysis via sequenced predictions over points and regions. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2609-2616.
47. Xu, S., Vosselman, G. and Oude Elberink, S., 2014. Multiple-entity based classification of airborne laser scanning data in urban areas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 88, pp. 1-15.