Erratum: Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing [Biomater Res, 20, (2016) 15] DOI:10.1186/s40824-016-0063-5;Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing

Biomaterials Research

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Lee, Seung Moon ^a   Park, Il Kyu ^a   Kim, Yong Soo ^a   Kim, Hyun Jung ^a   Moon, Hanlim ^b   Mueller, Stefan ^b   Jeong, Young IL ^c  

^a Genewel Co Ltd   (South Korea)

^b Mundipharma Manufacturing Pte Ltd   (Singapore)

^c Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Absorption pattern; Absorption retention capacity; Foam dressing; Moisture vapor transmission rate; Porosity; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85031114410     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20557124     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40824-016-0084-0     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Moore OA, Smith LA, Campbell F, Seers K, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2001;1:2.
2. Shobana S, Krishnaswamy K, Sudha V, Malleshi NG, Anjana RM, Palaniappan L, Mohan V. Finger millet (Ragi, Eleusine coracana L.): a review of its nutritional properties, processing, and plausible health benefits. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2013;69:1-39.
3. Beam JW. Topical silver for infected wounds. J Athl Train. 2009;44:531-3. 4. Zahedi P, Rezaeoam O, Ranaei-Siadat S, Jafari S, Supaphol P. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym Adv Technol. 2010;21:77-95.
4. Zahedi P, Rezaeoam O, Ranaei-Siadat S, Jafari S, Supaphol P. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym Adv Technol. 2010;21:77-95
5. Khan TA, Peh KK, Ch'ng HS. Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan films for wound dressing. J Pharm Pharmaceutical Sci. 2000;3:303-11.
6. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Sudheesh Kumar PT, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29:322-37.
7. Kim HJ, Choi EY, Oh JS, Lee HC, Park SS, Cho CS. Possibility of wound dressing using poly(L-leucine)/poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(L-leucine) triblock copolymer. Biomaterials. 2000;21:131-41.
8. Hinrichs WL, Lommen EJ, Wildevuur CR, Feijen J. Fabrication and characterization of an asymmetric polyurethane membrane for use as a wound dressing. J Appl Biomater. 1992;3:287-303.
9. Junker JP, Caterson EJ, Eriksson E. The microenvironment of wound healing. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:12-6.
10. Doillon CJ. Porous collagen sponge wound dressings: in vivo and in vitro studies. J Biomater Appl. 1988;2:562-78.
11. Beam JW. Occlusive dressings and the healing of standardized abrasions. J Athl Train. 2008;43:600-7.
12. Zoellner P, Kapp H, Smola H. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006;52:34-6.
13. Corr DT, Hart DA. Biomechanics of scar tissue and uninjured skin. Adv Wound Care. 2013;2:37-43.
14. Kirby P. Quality of life, exudate management and the Biatain foam dressing range. Br J Nurs. 2008;17(S32):S34-7.
15. ASTM D3574-11, Standard test methods for flexible cellular materials -slab, bonded, and molded urethane foams.
16. EN 13726-2:2002, Test methods for primary wound dressings. Moisture vapour transmission rate of permeable film dressings.
17. EN 13726-1:2002, Test methods for primary wound dressings. Aspects of absorbency.
18. Levina EM, Kharitonova MA, Rovensky YA, Vasiliev JM. Cytoskeletal control of fibroblast length: experiments with linear strips of substrate. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:4335-41.
19. Gist S, Tio-Matos I, Falzgraf S, Cameron S, Beebe M. Wound care in the geriatric client. Clin Interv Aging. 2009;4:269-87.
20. Thomas S. Laboratory findings on the exudate-handling capabilities of cavity foam and foam-film dressings. J Wound Care. 2013;19(192):194-9.
21. Jang SS, Minn KE. Wound dressing after CO2 laser resurfacing using a new dressing material: Medifoam®. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;8:149-54.
22. Heit YI, Dastouri P, Helm DL, Pietramaggiori G, Younan G, Erba P, Münster S, Orgill DP, Scherer SS. Foam pore size is a critical interface parameter of suction-based wound healing devices. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:589-97.
23. Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89:219-29.
24. Yoo SC, Han SK, Shin YW, Ho HW, Choi YJ, Chung DS, Lee BI, Kim WK. Comparison of Effect of Polyurethane Foam Dressings on Epithelialization of White Rat. J. Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;30:231-236.
25. Li X-C, Qiao L, Huang X-Q, Yuan K-J, Yang H-Z. Clinical evaluation of polyurethane foam dressing on wound healing of skin graft donor site. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science). 2013;33:663.