Sharing of science is most likely among male scientists

Scientific Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Massen, Jorg J M ^a   Bauer, Lisa ^a   Spurny, Benjamin ^a   Bugnyar, Thomas ^a   Kret, Mariska E ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONNEL; SCIENCE;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE;

EID: 85031030894     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13491-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785-791 (2003).
2. Silk, J. B. et al. Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 437, 1357-1359 (2005).
3. Tennie, C., Jensen, K. & Call, J. The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees. Nat. Commun. 7, 13915 (2016).
4. Horner, V., Carter, J. D., Suchak, M. & de Waal, F. B. M. Spontaneous prosocial choice by chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13847-13851 (2011).
5. McAuliffe, K. & Thorton, A. The psychology of cooperation in animals: an ecological approach. J. Zool. 295, 23-35 (2015).
6. Burkart., J. M., Allon, O. & Amici, F. et al. The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4747 (2014).
7. Kümmerli, R., Burton-Chellew, M. N., Ross-Gillespie, A. & West, S. A. Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10125-10130 (2010).
8. Cronin, K. A., Acheson, D. J., Hernandez, P. & Sanchez, A. Hierarchy is detrimental for human cooperation. Sci. Rep. 5, 18634 (2015).
9. Muniesa, F. The Problem with Economics: Naturalism, Critique and Performativity. In: Enecting Dismal Science, eds. Bodryrev I, Svetlova E (Palgrave Macmillan, US), pp. 109-129 (2016).
10. Editorial. Misspent youth. Nature 538, 427 (2016).
11. Maher, B. & Sureda Anfres, M. Under pressure. Young researchers are having to fight harder than past generations for a smaller share of the academic pie. Nature 538, 444-445 (2016).
12. Vander Ende, E. Naturejobs Blog http://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2016/10/21/why-dont-scientists-always-share-their-data/ (2016).
13. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T. & Mount, L. Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 71, 25-38 (1996).
14. Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J. & Van Vugt, M. Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychol Bull 137, 881-909 (2011).
15. Espinosa, M. P. & Kovárík, J. Prosocial behavior and gender. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 88 (2015).
16. Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 6219, 262-265 (2015).
17. Kashkat, E. R., Robbins, M. L., Leive, L. & Huang, A. S. Status of women microbiologists. Science 183, 488-494 (1974).
18. Shen, H. Mind the gender gap. Nature 495, 22-24 (2013).
19. Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474-16479 (2012).
20. Addessi, E., Borgi, M. & Palagi, E. Is Primatology an Equal-Opportunity Discipline? PLoS ONE 7, e30458 (2012).
21. Campbell, A., & Stockley, P. Theme issue 'Female competition and aggression'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368 (2013).
22. Rose, S. Women biologists and the "old boy" network Women's Stud. Int. Forum 12, 349-354 (1989).
23. McDonald, M. M., Navarrete, C. D. & Van Vugt, M. Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 367, 670-679 (2012).
24. Van Vugt, M. & Iredale, W. Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock tails. Brit. J. Psychol. 104, 3-13 (2013).
25. Raihani, N. J. & Smith, S. Competitive Helping in Online Giving. Curr. Biol. 25, 1183-1186 (2015).
26. Arnocky, S., Piche, T., Albert, G., Oullette, D., & Barclay, P. Altruism predicts mating success in humans. Brit. J. Psychol. 108, 416-435 (2016).
27. Massen, J. J. M., van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M. & Sterck, E. H. M. Generous leaders and selfish underdogs: Pro-sociality in despotic macaques. PLoS ONE 5, e9734 (2010).
28. Guinote, A., Cotzia, I., Sanhu, S. & Siwa, P. Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 731-736 (2015).
29. Massen, J. J. M., Luyten, I. J. A. F., Spruijt, B. M. & Sterck, E. H. M. Benefiting friends or dominants: Pro-social choices mainly depend on rank position in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Primates 52, 237-247 (2011).
30. Fiske, S. T., Dupree, C. H., Nicolas, G. & Swencionis, J. K. Status, power, and intergroup relations: The personal is the societal. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 11, 44-48 (2016).
31. Sterck, E. H. M., Olesen, C. U. & Massen, J. J. M. No costly pro-sociality among related long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. J. Comp. Psychol. 129, 275-282 (2015).
32. Branas-Garza, A., Duran, M. A. & Espinosa, M. P. Favouring friends. Bull. Econ. Res. 64, 172-178 (2012).
33. Benenson, J. F. & Wrangham, R. W. Cross-cultural sex differences in post-conflict affiliation following sports matches. Curr. Biol. 26, 2208-2212 (2016).