Participation rates with opt-out enrollment in a remote monitoring intervention for patients with myocardial infarction

JAMA Cardiology

Volumn 1, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 847-848

  Mehta, Shivan J ^a,b   Troxel, Andrea B ^a   Marcus, Noora ^a   Jameson, Christina ^a,b   Taylor, Devon ^a   Asch, David A ^a,b,c   Volpp, Kevin G ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT;

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; MEDICATION COMPLIANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TELEMONITORING; TELEMEDICINE;

HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85031014075     PISSN: 23806583     EISSN: 23806591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2374     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720-2726.
2. Loewenstein G, Brennan T, Volpp KG. Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors. JAMA. 2007;298(20):2415-2417.
3. Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. Medicine. Do defaults save lives? Science. 2003;302 (5649):1338-1339.
4. Troxel AB, Asch DA, Mehta SJ, et al. Rationale and design of a randomized trial of automated hovering for post–myocardial infarction patients: the HeartStrong program. Am Heart J. In press.
5. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Polit Econ. 1990;98(6):1325-1348. doi:10.1086/261737.