Strengthening the energy policy making process and sustainability outcomes in the oecd through policy design

Administrative Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Chapman, Andrew ^a   McLellan, Benjamin ^a   Tezuka, Tetsuo ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Energy; OECD; Policy; Policy cycle; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030772851     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20763387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/admsci6030009     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. OECD. Aligning Policies for a Low-Carbon Economy; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015.
2. OECD. Inequality: Inequality and Income, about the OECD: Our Mission. 2016. Available online: http://www.oecd.org (accessed on 3 February 2016).
3. 2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2012; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2012.
4. IEA; IRENA. Global Renewable Energy. IEA/IRENA Joint Policies and Measures Database. 2016. Available online: http://www.iea.org/policiesandmeasures/renewableenergy (accessed on 29 April 2016).
5. London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). 2015 Global Climate Legislation Study. 2015. Available online: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/2015-global-climate-legislation-study (accessed on 29 April 2016).
6. IEA. Energy Policies of IEA Countries. 2012–2015. Available online: http://www.iea.org/publications/countryreviews (accessed on 29 April 2016).
7. Chapman, A.; McLellan, B.; Tezuka, T. Residential solar PV policy: An analysis of impacts, successes and failures in the Australian case. Renew. Energy 2016, 86, 1265–1279. [CrossRef]
8. Mundaca, T. Climate change and energy policy in Chile: Up in smoke? Energy Policy 2013, 52, 235–248. [CrossRef]
9. White, W.; Lunnan, A. The Role of Governments in Renewable Energy: The Importance of Policy Consistency. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 57, 97–105. [CrossRef]
10. Jann, W.; Wegrich, K. Theories of the Policy Cycle. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods; Fischer, F., Miller, G.J., Sidney, M.S., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 43–62.
11. Hogwood, B.; Peters, G.B. Policy Dynamics; Wheatsheaf Books: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1983.
12. Freeman, B. Revisiting the Policy Cycle; Association of Tertiary Education Management, Developing Policy in Tertiary Institutions, Northern Metropolitan Institute of TAFE: Melbourne, Australia, 2013.
13. Howard, C. The policy cycle: A model of post-Machiavellian policy making? Aust. J. Public Adm. 2005, 64, 3–13. [CrossRef]
14. Howlett, M.; Ramesh, M. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Don Mills, ON, Canada, 2003.
15. Dye, T. Understanding Public Policy, 12th ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2008.
16. Birkland, T. Agenda Setting in Public Policy. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods; Fischer, F., Miller, G.J., Sidney, M.S., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 63–78.
17. Sidney, M. Policy Formulation: Design and Tools. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods; Fischer, F., Miller, G.J., Sidney, M.S., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 89–107.
18. Pulzl, H.; Treib, O. Implementing Public Policy. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods; Fischer, F., Miller, G.J., Sidney, M.S., Eds.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 79–87.
19. Althaus, C.; Bridgman, P.; Davis, G. The Australian Policy Handbook, 5th ed.; Allen & Unwin: Sydney, Australia, 2012.
20. Haapanen, L.; Tapio, P. Economic growth as phenomenon, institution and ideology: A qualitative content analysis of the 21st century growth critique. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3492–3503. [CrossRef]
21. Gerbic, P.; Stacey, E. A purposive approach to content analysis: Designing analytical frameworks. Internet High. Educ. 2005, 8, 45–59. [CrossRef]
22. Graneheim, U.; Lundman, B. A purposive approach to content analysis: Designing analytical frameworks. Nurse Educ. Today 2004, 24, 105–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Elo, S.; Kyngas, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 62, 107–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Cho, J.Y.; Lee, E. Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. Qual. Rep. 2014, 19, 1–20.
25. Marshall, C.; Rossman, G. Designing Qualitative Research; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2015.
26. HM Treasury. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government; HM Government Printer: London, UK, 2011.
27. The University of Texas at Austin. The Public Policy Process. 2016. Available online: http://www.laits. utexas.edu/gov310/PEP/policy/index.html (accessed on 2 April 2016).
28. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. The Policy Cycle. PolicyNL, 2016. Available online: http://www.policynl.ca/policydevelopment/policycycle.html (accessed on 3 April 2016).
29. European Commission. National Action Plans. United Kingdom and Greece. 2016. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy/national-action-plans (accessed on 4 April 2016).
30. The National Archives, HM Government. Energy Act 2013. 2013. Available online: http://www.legislation. gov.uk/ukpga/2013/32/pdfs/ukpga_20130032_en.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2016).
31. HM Government. The Coalition: Our Programme for Government; Cabinet Office: London, UK, 2010.
32. Australian Government. Federal Register of Legislation: Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000; Australian Government: Canberra, Australia, 2016.
33. Australian Government, Department of the Environment. The Renewable Energy Target (RET) Scheme. 2016. Available online: https://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/renewable-energy-target-scheme (accessed on 5 April 2016).
34. Australian Government, Department of Industry and Science. 2015 Energy White Paper; Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2015.
35. Australian Government, Clean Energy Regulator. Renewable Energy Target: How the Scheme Works, History of the Scheme. 2015. Available online: http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/RET/About-the-Renewable-Energy-Target/How-the-scheme-works (accessed on 5 April 2016).
36. British Columbian Government. Clean Energy Act 2010; Queen’s Printer: Victoria, BC, Canada, 2013.
37. Independent Electricity System Operator. Ontario FIT Program. 2009. Available online: http://fit.powerauthority. on.ca (accessed on 4 April 2016).
38. Government of Quebec. Quebec and Climate Change. A Challenge for the Future; 2016–2012 Action Plan; Bibliotheque Nationale du Quebec: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2008.
39. Japanese Government, Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry. Strategic Energy Plan. April 2014. Available online: http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/category/others/basic_plan/pdf/4th_strategic_energy_plan. pdf (accessed on 13 April 2016).
40. Japanese Government, Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry. Long-Term Energy Supply and Demand Outlook. July 2015. Available online: http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2015/pdf/0716_01a.pdf (accessed on 13 April 2016).
41. The Library of Congress. Energy Policy Act of 1992—Title XII—Renewable Energy. 2016. Available online: http://thomas.loc.gov (accessed on 24 April 2016).
42. Executive Office of the President. The Presidents Climate Action Plan; The White House: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
43. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Clean Power Plan. 2015. Available online: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-10-23/pdf/2015-22842.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2016).
44. Mexican Government. Official Journal of the Federation: Energy Transition Law 2015. Available online: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5421295 (accessed on 17 April 2016).
45. Bloomberg. Mexico Passes Law Encouraging Renewables Investment. International Environment Reporter, 15 December 2015. Available online: http://www.bna.com/mexico-passes-law-n57982065128 (accessed on 17 April 2016).
46. Brookings Institution. Mexico’s Energy Reforms Become Law. 2014. Available online: www.brookings.edu/ research/articles/2014/08/14-mexico-energy-law-negroponte (accessed on 17 April 2016).
47. Government of Chile, Ministry of Energy. Law No. 20.257 on Non-Conventional Renewable Energies. 2016. Available online: http://antiguo.minenergia.cl/minwww/opencms/08_Normativas/02_energias/renovables.html (accessed on 1 May 2016).
48. Government of Chile, National Energy Commission. Non-Conventional Renewable Energy in the Chilean Electricity Market; ByB Impresores: Santiago, Chile, 2009.
49. Government of Chile, Library of Congress. Law No. 20.571 Regulating the Payment of Electricity Tariffs of Residential Generators. 2012. Available online: http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1038211 (accessed on 1 May 2016).
50. Government of Chile, Ministry of Energy. National Energy Strategy 2012–2030. 2012. Available online: http://www.centralenergia.cl/uploads/2012/06/National-Energy-Strategy-Chile.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2016).
51. IRENA. Renewable Energy in Latin America 2015: An Overview of Policies; IRENA: Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2015.
52. Government of Greece, Ministry of Environment and Energy. Law 3851/2020: Accelerating the development of Renewable Energy Sources to Deal with Climate Change and Other Regulations Addressing Issues under the Authority of the Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change. 2010. Available online: http://www.ypeka.gr/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=qtiW90JJLYs%3D&tabid=37 (accessed on 23 March 2016).
53. Keay, M. UK energy policy—Stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy 2016, 94, 247–252. [CrossRef]
54. Simpson, G.; Clifton, J. Picking winners and policy uncertainty: Stakeholder perceptions of Australia’s Renewable Energy Target. Renew. Energy 2014, 67, 128–135. [CrossRef]
55. IEEJ. Special Article—Inside Japan’s Long-Term Energy Policy. 2015. Available online: http://eneken.ieej.or. jp/data/6291.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2016).
56. Elliott, E.D. Why the United States Does Not Have a Renewable Energy Policy. Environ. Law Rep. 2013, 43, 10095–10101.
57. Alemán-Nava, G.; Casiano-Flores, V.; Cárdenas-Chávez, D.; Díaz-Chavez, R.; Scarlat, N.; Mahlknecht, J.; Parra, R. Renewable energy research progress in Mexico: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 140–153. [CrossRef]
58. Mondol, J.; Koumpetsos, N. Overview of challenges, prospects, environmental impacts and policies for renewable energy and sustainable development in Greece. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 431–442. [CrossRef]
59. OECD. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All (Summary); OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015.